Latest Highlights
- The 2025 Rivian R1S fell short of its EPA range estimate by 24 miles
- There are 4 EVs in Edmunds' 400-mile-plus club
There are 45 EVs in Edmunds' 300-mile-plus club
There are 45 EVs in Edmunds' 300-mile-plus club
EV Range Leaderboard
Updated September 12, 2024
This chart shows an electric vehicle's official EPA range and energy consumption compared to the range and consumption results from Edmunds' own testing, which is designed to be a real-world complement to the EPA's laboratory-based process. If you see arrows in a column heading, click it to change the sort order.
Range | Consumption | Conditions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vehicle | |||||
2022 Lucid Air Dream Range | 520 miles | 505 miles* (-2.9%) | 27 kWh/100 mi | 28.3 kWh/100 mi (-4.8%) | 67° |
2022 Lucid Air Grand Touring (19-in wheels) | 516 miles | 465 miles* (-9.9%) | 26 kWh/100 mi | 28.4 kWh/100 mi (-9.2%) | 76° |
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ | 350 miles | 422 miles* (+20.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 29.5 kWh/100 mi (+15.7%) | 67° |
2024 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450+ | 339 miles | 407 miles* (+20.1%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 32.7 kWh/100 mi (+16.1%) | 66° |
2023 GMC Hummer EV | 329 miles | 390 miles* (+18.4%) | na | 57.8 kWh/100 mi (na) | 61° |
2023 Rivian R1T Performance Dual Motor (21-in. wheels) | 410 miles | 390 miles* (-4.9%) | 40 kWh/100 mi | 42.3 kWh/100 mi (5.6%) | 64° |
2025 Rivian R1S Performance Dual Motor Max (22-in. wheels) | 410 miles | 386 miles* (-5.9%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 41.7 kWh/100 mi (2.9%) | 99° |
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 | 340 miles | 381 miles* (+12.1%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 33 kWh/100 mi (+8.3%) | 62° |
2022 BMW iX xDrive50 (22-in wheels) | 315 miles | 377 miles* (+19.7%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 32.0 kWh/100 mi (+18.0%) | 73° |
2024 Mercedes-Maybach EQS SUV 680 | 280 miles | 368 miles* (+31.3%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 36.8 kWh/100 mi (+16.4%) | 78° |
2024 Polestar 2 Single Motor Long Range | 307 miles | 362 miles* (+17.9%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 24.5 kWh/100 mi (+15.4%) | 65° |
2023 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450+ | 305 miles | 360 miles* (+18.1%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 35.3 kWh/100 mi (+9.6%) | 64° |
2023 Fisker Ocean Extreme One (22-in. wheels) | 360 miles | 358 miles* (-0.6%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi (+4.3%) | 72° |
2024 Rivian R1T Performance Dual Motor Max (22-in. wheels) | 380 miles | 356 miles* (-6.4%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 44.9 kWh/100 mi (-4.5%) | 69° |
2023 Ford F-150 Lightning Lariat | 320 miles | 345 miles* (+7.8%) | 48 kWh/100 mi | 43.7 kWh/100 mi (+9.0%) | 72° |
2022 Tesla Model S Plaid (21-in wheels) | 348 miles | 345 miles* (-0.9%) | 33 kWh/ 100 mi | 32.1 kWh/ 100 mi (+2.7%) | 73° |
2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350+ | 279 miles | 345 miles* (+23.7%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 30.3 kWh/100 mi (+18.2%) | 77° |
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E California Route 1 | 305 miles | 344 miles (+12.8%) | 33 kWh/100 mi | 28.9 kWh/100 mi (+12.4%) | 58° |
2024 Hyundai Ioniq 6 SE RWD | 361 miles | 343 miles* (-5.1%) | 24 kWh/100 mi | 24.2 kWh/100 mi (-0.9%) | 69° |
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium Ext Range RWD | 300 miles | 341 miles (+13.7%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 29.2 kWh/100 mi (+16.6%) | 63° |
2024 Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD | 342 miles | 338 miles* (-1.2%) | 26 kWh/100 mi | 25.3 kWh/100 mi (+2.7%) | 74° |
2024 Tesla Cybertruck Foundation Series (All-terrain tires) | 318 miles | 334 miles* (-1.7%) | na | 45.1 kWh/100 mi (na) | 60° |
2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Platinum Extended Range | 300 miles | 332 miles* (+10.7%) | 51 kWh/100 mi | 45.4 kWh/100 mi (+11.0%) | 81° |
2022 Mercedes-Benz AMG EQS 53 4Matic | 277 miles | 332 miles* (+19.9%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 38.7 kWh/100 mi (+12.0%) | 79° |
2022 Rivian R1S Launch Edition | 316 miles | 330 miles* (+4.6%) | 49 kWh/100 mi | 47.4 kWh/100 mi (+3.3%) | 80° |
2023 BMW iX M60 (22-inch wheels) | 274 miles | 325 miles* (+18.6%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 37.4 kWh/100 mi (+13.1%) | 75° |
2024 Kia EV6 Wind RWD | 310 miles | 323 miles* (+4.2%) | 28 kWh/100 mi | 26.0 kWh/100 mi (+7.1%) | 67° |
2020 Porsche Taycan 4S (20-in wheels) | 203 miles | 323 miles* (+59.3%) | 49 kWh/100 mi | 32.3 kWh/100 mi (+34.1%) | 73° |
2024 BMW i5 eDrive40 | 270 miles | 321 miles* (+19.0%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 28.7 kWh/100 mi (+17.9%) | 77° |
2022 Rivian R1T Launch Edition | 314 miles | 321 miles* (+2.2%) | 48 kWh/100 mi | 47.0 kWh/100 mi (+2.2%) | 68° |
2023 BMW i7 xDrive60 (21-inch wheels) | 308 miles | 320 miles* (+3.8%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 35.5 kWh/100 mi (+9%) | 61° |
2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS AWD | 279 miles | 320 miles* (+14.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 31.1 kWh/100 mi (+11.0%) | 77° |
2024 Honda Prologue Elite AWD | 273 miles | 320 miles* (+17.3%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 31.1 kWh/100 mi (+16.1%) | 71° |
2024 Cadillac Lyriq AWD | 307 miles | 319 miles* (+3.8%) | 38 kWh/100mi | 37.6 kWh/100 mi (+1.0%) | 68° |
2020 Tesla Model S Performance | 326 miles | 318 miles* (-2.5%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 32.6 kWh/100 mi (+6.9%) | 60° |
2024 BMW i7 M70 (21-inch wheels) | 291 miles | 312 miles* (+7.0%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 36.9 kWh/100 mi (+12.1%) | 59° |
2023 Tesla Model Y Long Range | 330 miles | 310 miles* (-6.0%) | 28 kWh/100 mi | 27.3 kWh/100 mi (+2.3%) | 71° |
2023 Genesis Electrified G80 | 282 miles | 309 miles* (+9.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 30.6 kWh/100 mi (+12.6%) | 74° |
2022 Hyundai Kona Electric | 258 miles | 308 miles (+21.9%) | 28 kWh/100 mi | 23 kWh/100 mi (+20.4%) | 56° |
2022 BMW i4 eDrive40 Gran Coupe (19-in wheels) | 270 miles | 307 miles* (+13.8%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 29.3 kWh/100 mi (+13.9%) | 57° |
2023 Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Ext Range | 290 miles | 307 miles (+5.9%) | 37 kWh/ \100 mi | 32.7 kWh/100 mi (+11.7%) | 62° |
2024 Kia EV9 GT-Line | 270 miles | 306 miles* (+13.4%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 35.7 kWh/100 mi (+15.1%) | 72° |
2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Limited AWD | 270 miles | 303 miles* (+12.3%) | 33 kWh/100 mi | 27.5 kWh/100 mi (+16.8%) | 65° |
2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE 350 4Matic | 260 miles | 302 miles* (+16.0%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 34.4 kWh/100 mi (+18.1%) | 63° |
2024 Volvo XC40 Recharge RWD | 293 miles | 302 miles* (+3.0%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 29.0 kWh/100 mi (+9.3%) | 69° |
2024 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S | 291 miles | 299 miles* (+2.8%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 29.8 kWh/100 mi (+0.7%) | 67° |
2020 Tesla Model X Long Range | 328 miles | 294 miles* (-10.4%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 35.0 kWh/100 mi (0.0%) | 60° |
2022 Polestar 2 Long Range Single Motor | 270 miles | 289 miles* (+7.0%) | 31 kWh/100 mi | 30.1 kWh/100 mi (+2.9%) | 62° |
2022 Porsche Taycan (20-in wheels) | 225 miles | 286 miles* (+27.1%) | 45 kWh/100 mi | 35 kWh/100 mi (+22.2%) | 68° |
2022 Audi RS e-tron GT | 232 miles | 285 miles* (+22.8%) | 42 kWh/ 100 mi | 36.4 kWh/ 100 mi (+13.3%) | 77° |
2022 Kia EV6 GT-Line dual motor | 274 miles | 283 miles* (+3.3%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 29.5 kWh/100 mi (+7.8%) | 66° |
2023 Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor | 260 miles | 282 miles* (+8.4%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 31.8 kWh/100 mi (+6.5%) | 67° |
2023 Kia Niro EV | 253 miles | 280 miles (+10.7%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 25.6 kWh/100 mi (+11.7%) | 68° |
2022 Chevrolet Bolt EV | 259 miles | 278 miles (+7.3%) | 28 kWh/100 mi | 25.7 kWh/100 mi (+8.2%) | 71° |
2023 Genesis GV60 Performance | 235 miles | 274 miles* (+16.6%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 30.9 kWh/100 mi (+16.5%) | 76° |
2022 Audi e-tron GT | 238 miles | 273 miles* (+14.7%) | 41 kWh/100 mi | 37.2 kWh/100 mi (+9.3%) | 70° |
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance | 260 miles | 272 miles (+4.6%) | 41 kWh/100 mi | 37.4 kWh/100 mi (+8.8%) | 68° |
2022 Audi Q4 e-tron 50 | 241 miles | 270 miles* (+12.0%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 31.3 kWh/100 mi (+13.1%) | 71° |
2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited dual motor | 256 miles | 270 miles* (+5.5%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 30.9 kWh/100 mi (+9.1%) | 55° |
2023 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S dual motor | 255 miles | 269 miles* (+5.3%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 31.4 kWh/100 mi (+7.7%) | 62° |
2022 BMW i4 M50 | 227 miles | 268 miles* (+18.1%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 34.1 kWh/100 mi (+18.8%) | 75° |
2024 Polestar 2 Dual-Motor Performance | 247 miles | 268 miles* (+8.3%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 32.3 kWh/100 mi (+0.9%) | 67° |
2022 Chevrolet Bolt EUV Premier | 247 miles | 265 miles (+7.3%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 26.7 kWh/100 mi (+7.9%) | 78° |
2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Pro | 230 miles | 265 miles* (+15.2%) | 49 kWh/100 mi | 41.3 kWh/100 mi (+15.7%) | 72° |
2023 Nissan Ariya Platinum+ e-4orce | 257 miles | 265 miles* (+3.1%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 36.3 kWh/100 mi (+6.8%) | 63° |
2024 BMW i5 M60 (21-in wheels) | 240 miles | 264 miles* (+10.2%) | 40 kWh/100 mi | 35.0 kWh/100 mi (+12.6%) | 82° |
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Std. Range | 230 miles | 264 miles (+14.8%) | 34 kWh/ 100 mi | 29.2 kWh/ 100 mi (+14.1%) | 62° |
2020 Tesla Model Y Performance | 291 miles | 263 miles* (-9.6%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 29.6 kWh/100 mi (+1.3%) | 65° |
2022 Jaguar I-Pace EV400 HSE | 234 miles | 262 miles (+12.0%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 36.3 kWh/100 mi (+17.5%) | 67° |
2022 Porsche Taycan GTS | 246 miles | 259 miles* (+5.3%) | 41 kWh/100 mi | 38.2 kWh/100 mi (+6.8%) | 77° |
2024 Toyota bZ4X Limited FWD | 236 miles | 256 miles* (+8.5%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 25.9 kWh/100 mi (+13.6%) | 65° |
2018 Tesla Model 3 Performance | 310 miles | 256 miles* (-17.4%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 30.1 kWh/100 mi (-3.8%) | 61° |
2023 Genesis Electrified GV70 AWD Prestige | 236 miles | 255 miles* (+7.9%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 33.0 kWh/100 mi (+10.9%) | 68° |
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N | 221 miles | 253 miles* (+14.6%) | 47 kWh/100 mi | 35.9 kWh/100 mi (+23.2%) | 67° |
2022 Volvo C40 Recharge | 226 miles | 252 miles (+11.5%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 35.1 kWh/100 mi (+10.0%) | 74° |
2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG EQE | 225 miles | 251 miles* (+11.7%) | 46 kWh/100 mi | 38.0 kWh/100 mi (+17.4%) | 58° |
2022 Porsche Taycan 4S Cross Turismo (21-in wheels) | 215 miles | 250 miles* (+16.3%) | 45 kWh/100 mi | 39.2 kWh/100 miles (+12.9%) | 66° |
2024 Subaru Solterra Limited AWD | 222 miles | 249 miles* (+12.2%) | 33 kWh/100 mi | 27.8 kWh/100 mi (+15.7%) | 66° |
2022 Audi e-tron | 222 miles | 248 miles* (+11.7%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 38.4 kWh/100 miles (+10.7%) | 67° |
2024 Lexus RZ 300e (20-in wheels) | 226 miles | 345 miles* (+8.4%) | 31 kWh/100 mi | 28.7 kWh/100 mi (+7.6%) | 76° |
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 | 227 miles | 242 miles* (+6.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 32.2 kWh/100 mi (+8.0%) | 70° |
2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge | 208 miles | 240 miles* (+15.4%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 miles (+17.7%) | 70° |
2023 Kia EV6 GT | 206 miles | 238 miles* (+15.3%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 35.2 kWh/100 mi (+16.3%) | 61° |
2022 Nissan Leaf Plus SL | 215 miles | 237 miles (+10.2%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 27.1 kWh/100 mi (+15.3%) | 67° |
2020 Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus | 250 miles | 232 miles* (-7.2%) | 24 kWh/100 mi | 23.0 kWh/100 mi (+4.2%) | 67° |
2023 Lexus RZ450e (20-in wheels) | 196 miles | 204 miles* (+4.1%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 30.7 kWh/100 mi (+14.7%) | 57° |
2020 Hyundai Ioniq Electric | 170 miles | 202 miles (+18.9%) | 25 kWh/100 mi | 20.8 kWh/100 mi (+16.8%) | 70° |
2023 MINI Cooper SE | 114 miles | 129 miles (+13.3%) | 31 kWh/ 100 mi | 25.3 kWh/ 100 mi (+18.3%) | 60° |
2022 Mazda MX-30 | 100 miles | 114 miles (+14.0%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 29.6 kWh/100 mi (+20.0%) | 55° |
*Range tested at maximum battery charge to align with EPA estimates. Manufacturer recommends a lower battery charge level for daily use to preserve battery life.
In short, this is the approximate number of miles that a vehicle can travel in combined city and highway driving (using a mix of 55% highway and 45% city driving) before needing to be recharged, according to the EPA's testing methodology.
But what exactly is that methodology? First, the vehicle is fully charged and parked overnight. The following day, the vehicle is driven on a dynamometer — it's like a treadmill for cars — over successive simulated city and highway routes until the battery is depleted. The total distance traveled is then multiplied by a correction factor that the EPA has determined will more accurately reflect what drivers can expect to achieve in the real world. The value of this correction factor, which is always less than 1 but greater than 0, is determined by the number of drive cycles a vehicle is tested on.
In short, there's certainly a method to the EPA's madness, but the process is laboratory-based, and EV owners don't drive their cars in a lab. So what's the real-world version? That's where Edmunds' EV range testing comes in.
Akin to miles per gallon (mpg) for fuel-burning vehicles, this metric represents electric vehicles' energy consumption in kilowatt-hours per hundred miles (kWh/100 miles). A battery stores energy in kilowatt-hours much like a gas tank stores fuel in gallons. This value tells you how much energy in kilowatt-hours a vehicle would use to travel 100 miles.
Unlike mpg, however, where a larger number is better (for example, a vehicle that gets 30 mpg is better than one that gets 20 mpg), a smaller number is better in kWh/100 miles because you are using less battery energy per mile. So a vehicle that uses 20 kWh/100 miles is more efficient than one that uses 30 kWh/100 miles.
In EPA testing, once a vehicle battery is depleted, it is recharged using the manufacturer-supplied charger for that vehicle. The energy consumption is then determined mathematically from the recharging energy, the energy-discharge data from the vehicle, and the distance traveled for each cycle. The recharge energy includes any charging losses due to inefficiencies in the manufacturer’s charger.
Edmunds begins with full battery charge and drives an electric vehicle on a mix of city and highway roads (approximately 60% city, 40% highway) until the battery is almost entirely empty. (We target 10 miles of remaining range for safety.) The miles traveled and the indicated remaining range are added together for the Edmunds total tested range figure. We prefer to use a higher percentage of city road driving because we believe it's more representative of typical EV use.
After a vehicle completes its road loop and the battery is nearly empty, it's charged back to full capacity. The kilowatt-hours used from plug-in to a full charge are tracked and then we calculate the consumption based on the miles traveled (less the remaining range). This process takes into account charging losses in the Edmunds tested consumption number.
This figure is the difference between the EPA's range estimate and the range tested in Edmunds' real-world testing. A positive percentage (in green) means Edmunds exceeded the range estimated by the EPA, while a negative percentage (in red) means a vehicle fell short of its EPA range during our test.
This figure is the difference between the EPA's energy consumption estimate and the energy consumption Edmunds calculated based on our real-world testing. A positive percentage (in green) means a vehicle used that much less energy than its EPA estimate and was more efficient in Edmunds' testing. A negative percentage (in red) means a vehicle used that much more energy than its EPA estimate and was less efficient in Edmunds' testing. Remember, a lower kWh/100 miles number is better if you're talking EVs.
Ambient temperature — how cold or hot it is outside — matters a whole lot when it comes to electric vehicle range, so we list the daily average temperature on the day of testing. California, and more specifically Los Angeles, has one of the more temperate climates in the world, which helps keep our testing conditions relatively consistent throughout the year. But since we can't control the weather, we thought we'd at least report it.
Edmunds drives on specific road routes that cover both highway and city driving around the greater Los Angeles area. We aim for a mix of 60% city driving and 40% highway, assuming that most electric vehicle owners will likely spend more time in stop-and-go traffic than they will on the open highway. Since no electric vehicle has exactly the same range, the route length is adapted to suit each vehicle.
In EPA tests, a vehicle is run in the default settings at startup. If there are more efficient drive modes available, or if you can increase the level of regenerative braking, but the vehicle doesn't default to these settings, they won't be utilized. Edmunds' standard practice is to use the most efficient drive mode as long as it doesn't affect safety or practical comfort levels, such as deactivating the climate control system or significantly reducing power for accelerating or maintaining appropriate highway speeds.
We run with windows up and the climate control set to auto at 72 degrees, and we maximize regenerative braking during stops. We follow the posted speed limits and keep within 5 mph of them, traffic and conditions permitting.
The short answer is neither. So many factors contribute to how far an electric vehicle will travel on a single charge that to come up with a single figure for every situation is impossible. The EPA's testing is highly controlled and standardized, but as we've found in our testing, the real-world correlation can vary dramatically depending on the vehicle.
Because Edmunds' testing uses a more conservative driving style and puts greater emphasis on city driving over highway driving (compared to the EPA's mix), our figures will often be on the higher end for range, which usually equates to better efficiency. But that's not always the case. Overall, our figures are intended to provide EV owners and potential customers with an additional data point so that they can make more informed decisions.
†To date, every Tesla vehicle we've run on our real-world test route has failed to hit its EPA range estimate within the testing parameters described above, whereas most non-Tesla vehicles have surpassed their EPA estimates. Please refer to the chart above for our full test results.