Latest Highlights
- The 2027 Tesla Model Y L is the most efficient three-row EV we've ever tested.
- There are 5 EVs in Edmunds' 500-mile-plus club
- There are 8 EVs in Edmunds' 400-mile-plus club
- There are over 50 EVs in Edmunds' 300-mile-plus club
This chart shows an electric vehicle's official EPA range and energy consumption compared to the range and consumption results from Edmunds' own testing, which is designed to be a real-world complement to the EPA's laboratory-based process. If you see arrows in a column heading, click it to change the sort order.
| Vehicle | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ | 465 miles | 558 miles (+20.0%) | NA | 43.1 kWh/100 mi (NA) | 70° |
| 2025 Chevrolet Silverado EV WT | 492 miles | 539 miles (+9.1%) | 50 kWh/100 mi | 45.3 kWh/100 mi (+9.3%) | 64° |
| 2026 Cadillac Escalade IQL 1000 E4 | 460 miles | 532 miles (+15.7%) | NA | 45.7 kWh/100 mi | 78° |
| 2025 GMC Sierra EV Denali | 460 miles | 507 miles (+10.1%) | na | 48.1 kWh/100 mi | 58° |
| 2022 Lucid Air Dream Range | 520 miles | 505 miles (-2.9%) | 27 kWh/100 mi | 28.3 kWh/100 mi (-4.8%) | 67° |
| 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV RST | 450 miles | 484 miles (+7.6%) | 53 kWh/100 mi | 49.2 kWh/100 mi (+7.2%) | 65° |
| 2022 Lucid Air Grand Touring (19-in wheels) | 516 miles | 465 miles (-9.9%) | 26 kWh/100 mi | 28.4 kWh/100 mi (-9.2%) | 76° |
| 2025 Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ | 390 miles | 464 miles (+18.9%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 29.1 kWh/100 mi (+16.8%) | 67° |
| 2026 Mercedes-Benz CLA 250+ | 374 miles | 434 miles (+15.9%) | 27 kWh/100 mi | 23.2 kWh/100 mi (+16.5%) | 66° |
| 2026 GMC Sierra EV Elevation Ext. Range | 410 miles | 428 miles (+4.3%) | 50 kWh/100 mi | 47.4 kWh/100 mi (+5.6%) | 80° |
| 2024 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450+ | 339 miles | 407 miles (+20.1%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 32.7 kWh/100 mi (+16.1%) | 66° |
| 2026 Audi A6 e-tron | 392 miles | 402 miles (+2.5%) | 27 kWh/100 mi | 25.5 kWh/100 mi (+5.5%) | 74° |
| 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring (2-row/all-season tires) | 450 miles | 400 miles (+-11.1%) | na | 35.0 kWh/100 mi (-12.9%) | 82° |
| 2026 Tesla Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive | 363 miles | 393 miles (+8.2%) | 25 kWh/100 mi | 21.7 kWh/100 mi (+13.2%) | 68° |
| 2026 Audi A6 Sportback e-tron Prestige AWD | 333 miles | 392 miles (+17.6%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 26.3 kWh/100 mi (+17.6%) | 76° |
| 2023 GMC Hummer EV | 329 miles | 390 miles (+18.4%) | na | 57.8 kWh/100 mi (na) | 61° |
| 2023 Rivian R1T Performance Dual Motor (21-in. wheels) | 410 miles | 390 miles (-4.9%) | na | 42.3 kWh/100 mi (-5.6%) | 64° |
| 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring (2-row/summer performance tires) | 407 miles | 388 miles (-4.6%) | na | 35.8 kWh/100 mi (-5.3%) | 83° |
| 2025 Rivian R1S Performance Dual Motor Max (22-in. wheels) | 410 miles | 386 miles (-5.9%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 41.7 kWh/100 mi (+2.9%) | 99° |
| 2027 Mercedes-Benz CLA 350 4Matic Electric | 312 miles | 385 miles (+23.2%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 25.7 kWh/100 mi (+12.8%) | 68° |
| 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 | 340 miles | 381 miles (+12.1%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 33 kWh/100 mi (+8.3%) | 62° |
| 2022 BMW iX xDrive50 (22-in wheels) | 315 miles | 377 miles (+19.7%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 32.0 kWh/100 mi (+18.0%) | 73° |
| 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 400 4Matic | 312 miles | 373 miles (+19.6%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 36.2 kWh/100 mi (+18.8%) | 64° |
| 2024 Mercedes-Maybach EQS SUV 680 | 280 miles | 368 miles (+31.3%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 36.8 kWh/100 mi (+16.4%) | 78° |
| 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 SEL | 320 miles | 366 miles (+14.3%) | 38 kWh/100 mi | 32.4 kWh/100 mi (+17.2%) | 78° |
| 2025 Porsche Taycan Performance Battery Plus | 318 miles | 364 miles (+14.4%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 30.8 kWh/100 mi (+20.2%) | 63° |
| 2024 Polestar 2 Single Motor Long Range | 307 miles | 362 miles (+17.9%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 24.5 kWh/100 mi (+15.4%) | 62° |
| 2025 Audi S6 Sportback e-tron quattro | 302 miles | 361 miles (+19.5%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 29.0 kWh/100 mi (+17.0%) | 76° |
| 2025 Rivian R1S Tri Max (22-in wheels) | 371 miles | 361 miles (-2.7%) | 45 kWh/100 mi | 43.6 kWh/100 mi (+3.2%) | 80° |
| 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450+ | 305 miles | 360 miles (+18.1%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 35.3 kWh/100 mi (+9.6%) | 64° |
| 2027 Tesla Model Y L Premium AWD (20-in wheels) | 320 miles | 358 miles (+11.8%) | n/a | 25.1 kWh/100 mi (n/a) | 84° |
| 2023 Fisker Ocean Extreme One (22-in. wheels) | 360 miles | 358 miles (-0.6%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi (+4.3%) | 72° |
| 2024 Rivian R1T Performance Dual Motor Max (22-in. wheels) | 380 miles | 356 miles (-6.4%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 44.9 kWh/100 mi (-4.5%) | 69° |
| 2025 Chevrolet Equinox EV 2LT | 319 miles | 356 miles (+11.7%) | 31 kWh/100 mi | 28.9 kWh/100 mi (+6.6%) | 61° |
| 2024 Porsche Macan 4 | 308 miles | 352 miles (+14.2%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 29.2 kWh/100 mi (+14.2%) | 69° |
| 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 320+ | 302 miles | 349 miles (+15.4%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 31.2 kWh/100 mi (+15.2%) | 76° |
| 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Caligraphy | 311 miles | 349 miles (+12.2%) | 40 kWh/100 mi | 34.3 kWh/100 mi (+12.2%) | 74° |
| 2025 Lucid Air Pure (20-inch wheels) | 372 miles | 349 miles (-6.1%) | 26 kWh/100 mi | 27.3 kWh/100 mi (-5.2%) | 74° |
| 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350+ | 279 miles | 345 miles (+23.7%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 30.3 kWh/100 mi (+18.2%) | 77° |
| 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Lariat | 320 miles | 345 miles (+7.8%) | 48 kWh/100 mi | 43.7 kWh/100 mi (+9.0%) | 72° |
| 2021 Tesla Model S Plaid | 348 miles | 345 miles (-0.9%) | 33 kWh/100 mi | 32.1 kWh/100 mi (+2.7%) | 73° |
| 2025 Polestar 3 Single Motor (21-inch wheels) | 350 miles | 344 miles (-1.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 34.8 kWh/100 mi (+0.6%) | 65° |
| 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Limited RWD | 361 miles | 343 miles (-5.1%) | 24 kWh/100 mi | 24.2 kWh/100 mi | 69° |
| 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium Ext Range RWD | 300 miles | 341 miles (+13.7%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 29.2 kWh/100 mi (+16.6%) | 63° |
| 2025 Cadillac Optiq Sport 2 | 302 miles | 339 miles (+12.2%) | 33 kWh/100 mi | 29.8 kWh/100 mi (+10.8%) | 79° |
| 2026 Tesla Model 3 Standard | 321 miles | 339 miles (+5.6%) | 24 kWh/100 mi | 23.0 kWh/100 mi (+4.5%) | 79° |
| 2026 BMW iX xDrive45 | 279 miles | 338 miles (+21.0%) | 40 kWh/100 mi | 31.9 kWh/100 mi (+25.5%) | 79° |
| 2024 Tesla Model 3 Long Range | 341 miles | 338 miles (-0.9%) | 26 kWh/100 mi | 25.3 kWh/100 mi (+2.7%) | 74° |
| 2025 Porsche Taycan 4S Performance Battery Plus | 295 miles | 337 miles (+14.3%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 32.8 kWh/100 mi (+15.9%) | 65° |
| 2026 Tesla Model Y Standard | 321 miles | 337 miles (+5.0%) | 24.0 kWh/100 mi | 22.8 kWh/100 mi (+5.1%) | 71° |
| 2025 Cadillac Vistiq 900 E4 | 305 miles | 334 miles (-9.3%) | 39.0 kWh/100 mi | 36.6 kWh/100 mi (+6.6%) | 78° |
| 2024 Tesla Cybertruck Foundation Series | 340 miles | 334 miles (-1.7%) | na | 42.0 kWh/100 mi (na) | 74° |
| 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Platinum Extended Range | 300 miles | 332 miles (+10.7%) | 51 kWh/100 mi | 45.4 kWh/100 mi (+11.0%) | 81° |
| 2022 Mercedes-Benz AMG EQS 53 4Matic | 277 miles | 332 miles (+19.9%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 38.7 kWh/100 mi (+12.0%) | 79° |
| 2026 Toyota bZ XLE Plus FWD | 314 miles | 331 miles (+5.4%) | 26 kWh/100 mi | 23.3 kWh/100 mi (+11.4%) | 74° |
| 2022 Rivian R1S Launch Edition | 316 miles | 330 miles (+4.6%) | 49 kWh/100 mi | 47.4 kWh/100 mi (+3.3%) | 80° |
| 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range Launch Series | 327 miles | 327 miles (0.0%) | 27 kWh/100 mi | 26.8 kWh/100 mi (+0.6%) | 64° |
| 2025 GMC Hummer EV SUV 3X Extreme Off-road | 289 miles | 325 miles (+12.5%) | 70 kWh/100 mi | 62.6 kWh/100 mi (+10.6%) | 73° |
| 2025 Porsche Macan 4S | 288 miles | 323 miles (+12.3%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 33.9 kWh/100 mi (+9.3%) | 65° |
| 2024 Kia EV6 Wind RWD | 310 miles | 323 miles (+4.2%) | 28 kWh/100 mi | 26.0 kWh/100 mi (+7.1%) | 67° |
| 2024 BMW i5 eDrive40 | 270 miles | 321 miles (+19.0%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 28.7 kWh/100 mi (+17.9%) | 77° |
| 2022 Rivian R1T Launch Edition All-terrain tires | 314 miles | 321 miles (+2.2%) | 48 kWh/100 mi | 47.0 kWh/100 mi (+2.2%) | 68° |
| 2024 Honda Prologue Elite AWD | 273 miles | 320 miles (+17.3%) | 31.1 kWh/100 mi | 31.1 kWh/100 mi (+16.1%) | 71° |
| 2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS AWD | 279 miles | 320 miles (+14.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 31.1 kWh/100 mi (+11.0%) | 77° |
| 2026 Cadillac Lyriq V | 285 miles | 320 miles (+12.2%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 38.3 kWh/100 mi (+9.6%) | 76° |
| 2023 BMW i7 xDrive60 (21-inch wheels) | 308 miles | 320 miles (+3.8%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 35.5 kWh/100 mi (+9.0%) | 61° |
| 2024 Cadillac Lyriq | 307 miles | 319 miles (+3.8%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 31.1 kWh/100 mi (+1.0%) | 68° |
| 2020 Tesla Model S Performance | 326 miles | 318 miles (-2.5%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 32.6 kWh/100 mi (+6.9%) | 60° |
| 2024 Acura ZDX Type S | 278 miles | 316 miles (+13.7%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 38.5 kWh/100 mi (++1.4%) | 73° |
| 2026 BMW iX M70 | 283 miles | 315 miles (+11.5%) | 45 kWh/100 mi | 39.4 kWh/100 mi (+14.3%) | 59° |
| 2024 BMW i7 M70 (21-inch wheels) | 291 miles | 312 miles (+7.0%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 36.9 kWh/100 mi (+12.1%) | 59° |
| 2026 Nissan Leaf Platinum+ | 259 miles | 310 miles (+19.5%) | 33 kWh/100 mi | 27.8 kWh/100 mi (+15.9%) | 67° |
| 2025 Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (22 inch wheels) | 300 miles | 310 miles (+3.5%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 38.8 kWh/100 mi (+8.3%) | 64° |
| 2023 Genesis Electrified G80 | 282 miles | 309 miles (+9.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 30.6 kWh/100 mi (+12.6%) | 74° |
| 2022 Hyundai Kona Electric | 258 miles | 308 miles (+21.9%) | 28 kWh/100 mi | 23.0 kWh/100 mi (+20.4%) | 56° |
| 2024 Porsche Taycan 4S Performance Battery w/20s | 252 miles | 307 miles (+21.9%) | 38 kWh/100 mi | 31.3 kWh/100 mi (+17.7%) | 83° |
| 2024 Kia EV9 GT-Line | 270 miles | 306 miles (+13.4%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 35.7 kWh/100 mi (+15.1%) | 72° |
| 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance | 303 miles | 306 miles (+1.1%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 28.5 kWh/100 mi (+4.9%) | 71° |
| 2027 Rivian R2 Performance AWD | 330 miles | 304 miles (-8.0%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 33.6 kWh/100 mi (-4.7%) | 83° |
| 2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Limited AWD | 270 miles | 303 miles (+12.3%) | 33 kWh/100 mi | 27.5 kWh/100 mi (+16.8%) | 65° |
| 2025 Polestar 3 Launch Edition | 279 miles | 303 miles (+8.6%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 38.8 kWh/100 mi (+11.8%) | 66° |
| 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE 350 4Matic | 260 miles | 302 miles (+16.0%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 34.4 kWh/100 mi (+18.1%) | 63° |
| 2024 Volvo XC40 Recharge RWD | 293 miles | 302 miles (+3.0%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 29.0 kWh/100 mi (+9.3%) | 69° |
| 2025 Porsche Macan Turbo | 288 miles | 301 miles (+4.6%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 33.5 kWh/100 mi (+9.5%) | 58° |
| 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD | 300 miles | 301 miles (+0.4%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 34.2 kWh/100 mi (+6.3%) | 74° |
| 2024 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S | 291 miles | 299 miles (+2.8%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 29.8 kWh/100 mi (+0.7%) | 67° |
| 2025 Rolls-Royce Spectre Black Badge (23-in wheels) | 251 miles | 298 miles (+18.6%) | 48 kWh/100 mi | 38.6 kWh/100 mi (+24.3%) | 74° |
| 2026 Porsche Macan Electric GTS (22-inch performance tires) | 294 miles | 298 miles (+1.4%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 34.0 kWh/100 mi (+8.1%) | 74° |
| 2025 Kia EV6 GT-Line | 270 miles | 296 miles (+9.5%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 31.0 kWh/100 mi (+12.9%) | 76° |
| 2020 Tesla Model X Long Range | 328 miles | 294 miles (-10.4%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 35.0 kWh/100 mi (0.0%) | 60° |
| 2026 Lexus ES 350e (21-inch wheels) | 292 miles | 293 miles (+0.2%) | 26.6 kWh/100 mi | n/a (n/a) | 77° |
| 2026 Tesla Model Y Performance | 306 miles | 293 miles (-4.2%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 30.8 kWh/100 mi (+3.8%) | 77° |
| 2026 Tesla Model 3 Performance (all-season tires) | 309 miles | 292 miles (-5.6%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 29.2 kWh/100 mi (+2.7%) | 75° |
| 2025 BMW i4 eDrive40 | 295 miles | 292 miles (-5.2%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 32.1 kWh/100 mi (-0.2%) | 58° |
| 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 XRT | 259 miles | 290 miles (+11.9%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 31.4 kWh/100 mi (+12.8%) | 59° |
| 2027 Chevrolet Bolt | 262 miles | 290 miles (+10.8%) | 28 kWh/100 mi | 26.2 kWh/100 mi (+7.1%) | 72° |
| 2025 Volvo EX40 Twin Motor Ultra | 260 miles | 287 miles (+10.5%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 30.2 kWh/100 mi (+19.2%) | 76° |
| 2026 Polestar 4 Dual Motor Pilot & Plus | 255 miles | 286 miles (+12.1%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 38.5 kWh/100 mi (+14.4%) | 63° |
| 2022 Audi RS e-tron GT | 232 miles | 285 miles (+22.8%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 36.4 kWh/100 mi (+13.3%) | 77° |
| 2022 Kia EV6 GT-Line dual motor | 274 miles | 283 miles (+3.3%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 29.5 kWh/100 mi (+7.8%) | 66° |
| 2026 BMW i5 xDrive40 (21" wheels) | 259 miles | 282 miles (+8.7%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 31.9 kWh/100 mi (+15.9%) | 63° |
| 2023 Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor | 260 miles | 282 miles (+8.4%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 31.8 kWh/100 mi (+6.5%) | 67° |
| 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited Dual-Motor | 269 miles | 282 miles (+4.8%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 32.4 kWh/100 mi (+4.7%) | 69° |
| 2026 Subaru Solterra XT Touring | 278 miles | 282 miles (+1.3%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 27.8 kWh/100 mi (+4.4%) | 75° |
| 2026 Cadillac Optiq V Series | 250 miles | 281 miles (+12.4%) | 41 kWh/100 mi | 37.0 kWh/100 mi (+9.6%) | 70° |
| 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance | 280 miles | 281 miles (+0.2%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 35.2 kWh/100 mi (+4.9%) | 76° |
| 2024 Rolls-Royce Spectre (23" wheels) | 266 miles | 281 miles (+5.6%) | 45 kWh/100 mi | 40.4 kWh/100 mi (+10.2%) | 62° |
| 2023 Kia Niro EV | 253 miles | 280 miles (+10.7%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 25.6 kWh/100 mi (+11.7%) | 68° |
| 2026 Genesis GV60 Performance | 252 miles | 279 miles (+10.6%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 33.2 kWh/100 mi (+10.3%) | 68° |
| 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Ext. Range | 261 miles | 279 miles (+6.7%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 26.1 kWh/100 mi (+11.0%) | 76° |
| 2026 Subaru Uncharted GT | 274 miles | 278 miles (+1.39%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 28.4 kWh/100 mi (+5.8%) | 68° |
| 2026 Toyota bZ Limited AWD (pre-production) | 278 miles | 276 miles (-0.6%) | NA | 28.3 kWh/100 mi (NA) | 70° |
| 2024 Jeep Wagoneer S Launch Edition | 303 miles | 276 miles (-8.9%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 37.6 kWh/100 mi (-6.8%) | 71° |
| 2022 Audi e-tron GT | 238 miles | 273 miles (+14.7%) | 41 kWh/100 mi | 37.2 kWh/100 mi (+9.3%) | 70° |
| 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally | 265 miles | 272 miles (+2.6%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 35.5 kWh/100 mi (+8.9%) | 67° |
| 2023 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S dual motor | 255 miles | 269 miles (+5.3%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 31.4 kWh/100 mi (+7.7%) | 62° |
| 2022 BMW i4 M50 | 227 miles | 268 miles (+18.1%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 34.1 kWh/100 mi (+18.8%) | 75° |
| 2024 Polestar 2 Dual-Motor Performance | 247 miles | 268 miles (+8.3%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 32.3 kWh/100 mi (-0.9%) | 67° |
| 2025 Mercedes-Benz G 580e | 239 miles | 266 miles (+11.1%) | 54 kWh/100 mi | 47.6 kWh/100 mi (+11.9%) | 69° |
| 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Pro | 230 miles | 265 miles (+15.2%) | 49 kWh/100 mi | 41.3 kWh/100 mi (+15.7%) | 72° |
| 2023 Nissan Ariya Platinum+ e-4orce | 257 miles | 265 miles (+3.1%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 36.3 kWh/100 mi (+6.8%) | 63° |
| 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Std. Range | 230 miles | 264 miles (+14.8%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 29.2 kWh/100 mi (+14.1%) | 62° |
| 2024 BMW i5 M60 (21-in wheels) | 240 miles | 264 miles (+10.2%) | 40 kWh/100 mi | 35.0 kWh/100 mi (+12.6%) | 82° |
| 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric Limited | 261 miles | 264 miles (+1.1%) | 29 kWh/100 mi | 26.6 kWh/100 mi (+9.0%) | 60° |
| 2022 Jaguar I-Pace EV400 HSE | 234 miles | 262 miles (+12.0%) | 44 kWh/100 mi | 36.3 kWh/100 mi (+17.5%) | 67° |
| 2026 Subaru Trailseeker Touring | 273 miles | 262 miles (-3.96%) | 30 kWh/100 mi | 30.1 kWh/100 mi (-0.47%) | 77° |
| 2025 Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro S Plus 4Motion | 231 miles | 262 miles (+13.7%) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 36.2 kWh/100 mi (+13.9%) | 71° |
| 2025 Audi Q4 55 e-tron | 258 miles | 261 miles (+1.3%) | 34 kWh/100 mi | 32.3 kWh/100 mi (+4.9%) | 59° |
| 2022 Porsche Taycan GTS | 246 miles | 259 miles (+5.3%) | 41 kWh/100 mi | 38.2 kWh/100 mi (+6.8%) | 77° |
| 2025 Volvo EX30 Twin Performance | 253 miles | 256 miles (+1.2%) | 31 kWh/100 mi | 28.6 kWh/100 mi (+8.6%) | 73° |
| 2025 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack | 216 miles | 255 miles (+18.1%) | 48 kWh/100 mi | 40.8 kWh/100 mi (+15.0%) | 59 |
| 2026 Lexus RZ 550e F Sport AWD | 229 miles | 255 miles (+11.2%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 30.4 kWh/100 mi (+15.1%) | 76 |
| 2023 Genesis Electrified GV70 AWD Prestige | 236 miles | 255 miles (+7.9%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 33.0 kWh/100 mi (+10.9) | 68° |
| 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N | 221 miles | 253 miles (+14.6%) | 47 kWh/100 mi | 35.9 kWh/100 mi (+23.2%) | 67° |
| 2024 Volvo C40 Recharge | 226 miles | 252 miles (+11.5%) | 39 kWh/100 mi | 35.1 kWh/100 mi (+10.0%) | 74° |
| 2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG EQE | 225 miles | 251 miles (+11.7%) | 46 kWh/100 mi | 38.0 kWh/100 mi (+17.4%) | 58° |
| 2022 Porsche Taycan 4S Cross Turismo (21-in wheels) | 215 miles | 250 miles (+16.3%) | 45 kWh/100 mi | 39.2 kWh/100 mi (+12.9%) | 66° |
| 2022 Audi e-tron | 222 miles | 248 miles (+11.7%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 38.4 kWh/100 mi (+10.7) | 67° |
| 2024 Lexus RZ 300e (20-in wheels) | 226 miles | 245 miles (+8.4%) | 31 kWh/100 mi | 28.7 kWh/100 mi (+7.6%) | 76° |
| 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 | 227 miles | 242 miles (+6.6%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 32.2 kWh/100 mi (+8.0%) | 70° |
| 2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge | 208 miles | 240 miles (+15.4%) | 43 kWh/100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi (+17.7%) | 70° |
| 2023 Kia EV6 GT | 206 miles | 238 miles (+15.3) | 42 kWh/100 mi | 35.2 kWh/100 mi (+16.3%) | 61° |
| 2022 Nissan Leaf Plus SL | 215 miles | 237 miles (+10.2%) | 32 kWh/100 mi | 27.1 kWh/100 mi (+15.3%) | 67° |
| 2025 Mini Cooper Countryman SE | 212 miles | 218 miles (+2.8%) | 35 kWh/100 mi | 32.2 kWh/100 mi (+8.6%) | 70° |
| 2023 Lexus RZ450e (20-in wheels) | 196 miles | 204 miles (+4.1%) | 36 kWh/100 mi | 30.7 kWh/100 mi (+14.7%) | 57° |
| 2024 Fiat 500e Inspi(Red) w/all-season tires | 142 miles | 159 miles (+11.8%) | 31 kWh/100 mi | 25.9 kWh/100 mi (+16.6%) | 70° |
| 2023 MINI Cooper SE | 114 miles | 129 miles (+13.3%) | 31 kWh/100 mi | 25.3 kWh/100 mi (+18.3%) | 60° |
| 2022 Mazda MX-30 | 100 miles | 114 miles (+14.0%) | 37 kWh/100 mi | 29.6 kWh/100 mi (+20.0%) | 55° |
| 2024 Honda Motocompacto (Power mode 1) | 12 miles | 14 miles (+15.0%) | n/a | 1.8 kWh/100 mi (NA) | 55° |
| 2024 Honda Motocompacto (Power mode 2) | 12 miles | 10 miles (-18.3%) | n/a | 2.6 kWh/100 mi (NA) | 83° |
Instrumented testing is at the core of every Edmunds rating and review. We drive hundreds of cars each year and take pride in our independent testing, and Edmunds is one of the few publications that still publishes proprietary testing numbers for the vehicles we rate and review. The data you see in Edmunds reviews (and much more data that doesn't make it online) was gathered by our team of experts, allowing us to verify whether claims, such as a 0 to 60 mph time, hold up to what a manufacturer states. We created the Edmunds EV Range Test as a way to compare estimates from the EPA and manufacturers with the results of actual driving in the real world.
As with our instrumented track testing, we aim to be as thorough and consistent as possible in conducting the Edmunds EV Range Test. The cars we test are new and have been purchased by Edmunds or supplied by an automaker. The night before a test, each vehicle is charged to 100% and tire pressures are adjusted to the manufacturer's settings. As with gas-powered cars, having your tires at the wrong pressure can affect efficiency.
The EPA's guidelines call for a vehicle to be tested in the default settings at startup. A vehicle may have more efficient drive modes available (such as Eco or Efficiency), and you may be able to adjust the level of regenerative braking, but if the vehicle doesn't default to these settings, they won't be used. We do things slightly differently.
Edmunds' standard practice is to use the most efficient drive mode available as long as it doesn't compromise safety or practical comfort levels, such as fully deactivating the climate control system, significantly reducing power for acceleration, or limiting a vehicle's highway speeds. We're not trying to achieve the best range possible; rather, we're testing how EVs perform in the real world. We test each vehicle with windows up and the climate control set to auto at 72 degrees. If there's a "driver only" setting for the climate control, we'll use that as well. We also set the regenerative braking to its maximum setting.
To measure speed, distances and more, we attach Racelogic VBOX data logging devices to each car. These are the same data loggers that we use for our track testing and our Edmunds U-Drags series. However, we've worked with Racelogic to develop a custom program specifically for the Edmunds EV Range Test, which allows us to better monitor progress in real time.
The VBOX utilizes GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, and Galileo satellite constellations to accurately track real-time speed, overall average speed, distance traveled, and display a readout of the amount of highway driving completed over the course of the test. The key with our custom program is that it allows us to make calculations on the fly regarding distance and speed. This means we can be consistent across all of our testing no matter the road or traffic conditions. If average speeds or highway percentages are off the mark, we can adjust our route to bring things in line.
While we also track distance using a vehicle's trip odometer, the numbers we publish are based on those from the VBOX, as there's often a slight disparity between the two. We also utilize sensors and warning lights within the VBOX to ensure that drivers don't accelerate or brake too aggressively while driving.
Every test starts and ends at the Edmunds office, but the route length is adapted to suit each vehicle while aiming for a mix of 60% city driving and 40% highway. The driving is done all in a single day, and for vehicles with an EPA-estimated range of over 300 miles, we often split the test between two drivers.
Each vehicle is driven until there's 10 miles of indicated range remaining. Those 10 miles are a safety buffer to ensure that drivers can make it back to the office without getting stranded. That remaining range is added to the total distance driven (as indicated by the VBOX) for our final range figure.
In addition to the Edmunds EV Range Test, we submit many of these same vehicles to the Edmunds EV Charging Test. You can learn more about how we test EV fast charging and see a leaderboard of the fastest-charging EVs we've tested right here.
While we occasionally carry out one-off range tests to see how EVs perform while towing or while driving in cold weather, the results from this leaderboard were all achieved on public roads in Southern California. We aim for a mix of 60% city and 40% highway driving, assuming that most electric vehicle owners will likely spend more time in stop-and-go traffic than they will on the open highway. For our testing, we consider highway driving to be any road with a speed limit of 55 mph or higher. Drivers are instructed to follow the posted speed limits and maintain a speed within 5 mph of them, traffic and conditions permitting.
This is the approximate number of miles that a vehicle can travel in combined city and highway driving (using a mix of 55% highway and 45% city driving) before needing to be recharged, according to the EPA's testing methodology. The EPA's mix is different from the 60% city and 40% highway mix we aim for with the Edmunds EV Range Test, which is part of the reason there's often a disparity between our results and the EPA estimates.
How do automakers certify their vehicles with the EPA? First, the vehicle is fully charged and parked overnight. The following day, the vehicle is driven on a dynamometer — it's like a treadmill for cars — over simulated city and highway routes until the battery is drained. The total distance traveled is then multiplied by a correction factor that the EPA has determined will more accurately reflect what drivers can expect to achieve in the real world. The value of this correction factor, which is always less than 1 but greater than 0, is determined by the number of drive cycles a vehicle is tested on.
While there's significant value in having a standardized test and rating, we've found that laboratory-based results don't always align with what we observe in the real world.
This is the result of the Edmunds EV Range Test for each vehicle, as outlined in the methodology above. The final figure is the total distance driven (as measured by the VBOX data logger) plus the remaining range at the end of the test. For driver safety, we don't fully drain an EV's battery on public roads, aiming to complete the test with 10 miles of range remaining.
This figure is the difference between the EPA's range estimate and the range tested in Edmunds' real-world testing. A positive percentage (in green) means Edmunds exceeded the range estimated by the EPA, while a negative percentage (in red) means a vehicle fell short of its EPA range estimate during our test. This is the figure we use to break any ties in our range leaderboard. For example, take two EVs that both traveled 300 miles. One exceeded its EPA estimate by 10% but the other did so by 25%. The one that exceeded it by 25% would be listed higher on our leaderboard.
Think of consumption like you would miles per gallon (mpg) for fuel-burning vehicles. It's a measure of efficiency, not distance. An electric vehicle's energy consumption is measured in kilowatt-hours per hundred miles (kWh/100 miles). A battery stores energy in kilowatt-hours, much like a gas tank stores fuel in gallons. This value tells you how much energy in kilowatt-hours a vehicle would use to travel 100 miles, just like mpg tells you how far a vehicle can drive on a single gallon of fuel.
Unlike mpg, however, where a larger number is better (for example, a vehicle that gets 30 mpg is better than one that gets 20 mpg), a smaller number is better in kWh/100 miles because you are using less battery energy per mile. So a vehicle that uses 20 kWh/100 miles is more efficient than one that uses 30 kWh/100 miles.
To measure consumption, the EPA starts with a vehicle with a completely drained battery. It's then fully recharged using the manufacturer-supplied charger for that vehicle. Consumption is calculated from the recharging energy, the energy-discharge data from the vehicle, and the distance traveled for each cycle. The recharge energy includes any charging losses due to inefficiencies in the manufacturer's charger.
After a vehicle completes the Edmunds EV Range Test and the battery is nearly empty, it's charged back to full using a Level 2 charger at the Edmunds office. The kilowatt-hours used from plug-in to a full charge are tracked and then we calculate the consumption based on the miles traveled (this doesn't include any remaining range, just actual miles traveled). This process takes into account charging losses in the Edmunds tested consumption number.
This figure is the difference between the EPA's energy consumption estimate and the energy consumption Edmunds calculated based on our real-world testing. A positive percentage (in green) means a vehicle used less energy than its EPA estimate and was more efficient in Edmunds' testing. A negative percentage (in red) means a vehicle used more energy than its EPA estimate and was less efficient in Edmunds' testing. Remember, a lower kWh/100 miles number is better if you're talking EVs.
Ambient temperature — how cold or hot it is outside — matters a whole lot when it comes to electric vehicle range, so we list the daily average temperature on the day of testing. Southern California has one of the more temperate climates in the world, which helps keep our testing conditions relatively consistent throughout the year. But since we can't control the weather, we thought we'd at least report it.
In addition to a VBOX, we attach a small weather sensor to the outside of every vehicle we test, then report the average temperature over the course of the drive. We don't do any weather correction, but it's helpful to know the testing conditions.
The short answer is neither. Many factors contribute to the distance an electric vehicle can travel on a single charge — including weather, driving style, the number of passengers, and the amount of cargo — making it impossible to come up with a single figure for every situation. The EPA's testing is highly controlled and standardized, but as we've found in our testing, the real-world correlation can vary dramatically depending on the vehicle.
Edmunds' testing uses a more conservative driving style and puts greater emphasis on city driving over highway driving (compared to the EPA's mix), and our figures often (but not always) exceed EPA estimates. While gas- or diesel-powered vehicles are usually more efficient on the highway, EVs tend to be less efficient as speeds increase. Overall, our figures are intended to provide EV owners and potential owners with an additional data point, enabling drivers to make more informed decisions.