Skip to main content

Used 2010 Ford Ranger SuperCab Consumer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
16 reviews

See Edmunds pricing data

Has Your Car's Value Changed?

Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.

Price history graph example

Trending topics in reviews

Pros
Cons
4.5 out of 5 stars

Not bad for an old body!

Gonzo, 08/18/2010
2010 Ford Ranger XLT 2dr SuperCab Styleside SB (2.3L 4cyl 5M)
13 of 13 people found this review helpful

In the past 5 years I have owned 3 trucks, a Honda Ridgeline, a Nissan Frontier and the new Ford Ranger. The Ridgeline and the Frontiers were both 6 cyl and gas guzzlers. I don't tow, so I wanted better mileage and a 4 cyl was the one I needed. I settled for the Ranger because I can get it pretty much with everything I want on the XLT model. It is a great small/compact truck and I like this. Mileage is very good and the 4 cyl has enough power for my needs. I was getting 14 MPG's on the Ridgeline and 15 MPG on the Frontier. I get way over 24 in the city with the Ranger and so far almost 30 on the highway. Nice truck for the price.

Report Abuse

4.5 out of 5 stars

Better Than Expected

Don, 11/03/2010
2010 Ford Ranger SPORT 2dr SuperCab Styleside SB (4.0L 6cyl 5M)
12 of 12 people found this review helpful

Needed a smaller truck for use on homestead. We have an Expedition but it is not ideal for work intended. Power from the 4.0 L is good. Averaged 22 mpg on 800 mile trip at 75 mph. Mixed driving around area and average around 18 mpg.still a lot better than the Expedition. In the past I have had full size diesels, V-8s and one B-2000 Mazda (208,000 miles). This truck performs as well and gets the job required done with no problems.

Report Abuse
2010 Ford Ranger for sale near you
Showing 3 of 7 listings
See all 7 listings

5 out of 5 stars

Completely Satisfied

Phil, 06/30/2010
2010 Ford Ranger XLT 2dr SuperCab Styleside SB (2.3L 4cyl 5M)
4 of 4 people found this review helpful

Bought this truck to replace a 4 door with a 3.0 V6. I thought I would be sacrificing performance for gas mileage, but I was wrong. The taller gearing takes a little getting used to but the performance is as good or better than the 3.0 V6, and the gas mileage is much better. I can get 27 on the hi-way and 22 to 24 around town. The 16 valve engine likes to rev, and feels very snappy in town, while handling the hills quite well. I had no trouble at all pulling the Shasta/Siskiou grade on I-5 in 5th gear. I also had a 91 with the old 2.3 liter, and I think this compares quite well with that truck. The transmission and overall fit and finish is better on this one too. I am quite pleased.

Report Abuse
Advertisement
2025 Ford Ranger
At a Glance:
  • 8 Colors
  • 4 Trims
  • $33,350starting MSRP
Build & Price Ford.com
Current Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) for base vehicle. Excludes destination/delivery fee plus government fees and taxes, any finance charges, any dealer processing charge, any electronic filing charge, and any emission testing charge. Optional equipment not included.

4.13 out of 5 stars

Poor Gas Mileage

Mike, 09/28/2010
2010 Ford Ranger SPORT 4dr SuperCab Styleside SB (4.0L 6cyl 5M)
6 of 7 people found this review helpful

Since buying the truck, I have recorded every gas purchase into an excel spreadsheet. Recording price per gallon, gallons purchased, cost, date of transaction, transaction number, etc. Then calcing mileage of last tank of gas & over all mileage. My overall mileage is very slightly over 16 MPG. I do not drive the vehicle hard and my driving is a mix of highway & city. When I have driven a full tank of almost all highway I only got 15.871 MPG.

Report Abuse

4.38 out of 5 stars

Just like old times

Glenn, 12/21/2009
2010 Ford Ranger XLT 4dr SuperCab 4WD Styleside SB (4.0L 6cyl 5M)
6 of 7 people found this review helpful

This is my third Ranger. It is just like my last one, however my last one was a 1994 model. Some may think this is a bad thing but I view it differently. I know that this vehicle will be reliable and when used as intended, it is not a disappointment. This truck was designed when trucks were to be used as trucks and not luxury vehicles. It isn't as refined as its competition but it will do a hard days work at a much more reasonable price. It is like driving a truck from the past but sometimes the past isn't so bad.

Report Abuse
Items per page:
5