Used 2017 Chevrolet Express Cargo 3500 Van Review
Consumer reviews
There are no consumer reviews for the 2017 Chevrolet Express Cargo 3500 Van.
Edmunds Summary Review of the 2017 Chevrolet Express Cargo 3500 Van
Pros & Cons
- Pro:Powerful V8 engines
- Pro:Towing and payload capabilities are near or at the top of the class
- Con:Less cargo space than many competitors
- Con:V8 engines are thirstier than competitors' V6 offerings
- Con:No high-roof cargo option
- Con:Dated interior styling and touchscreen interface
Which Express Cargo does Edmunds recommend?
Since the 2017 Chevrolet Express is only available in one equipment trim, which load, engine and wheelbase configuration you should buy depends on your cargo needs. If it were up to us, we'd start with the long-wheelbase van to make up for the Express' comparatively small cargo area. We'd also go with the four-cylinder diesel engine for its fuel economy and the 2500 load rating to keep costs down.
Full Edmunds Review: 2017 Chevrolet Express Cargo Van
Interior
The interior looks exceptionally dated in comparison with the rest of the class. The old-school vibe continues with the engine covering that protrudes into the driver and passenger footwell. Getting into the cargo area is hampered by a low roof and the lack of a door behind the driver.
Utility
Cargo volume behind the front seats measures 239.7 cubic feet in the short-wheelbase (SWB) Express, increasing to 284.4 cubes in the long-wheelbase (LWB) model. Cargo capacity in the SWB model is in line with similar vans, but the LWB's volume is lacking. Rivals offer taller roofs and longer bodies.
Technology
The standard radio comes only with AM/FM radio reception and an auxiliary jack. You'll have to pay more for a CD player, satellite radio, a USB port and an ancient touchscreen interface that is several generations removed from what's used in other Chevrolets.
Edmunds Insurance Estimator
The Edmunds TCO® estimated monthly insurance payment for a 2017 Chevrolet Express Cargo in Ohio is:
not availableLegal