Comparison Test: 2008 Subaru WRX vs. 2007 Mazdaspeed 3

Comparison Test: 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX vs. 2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3

  • Full Review
  • Pricing & Specs
  • Road Tests (2)
  • Comparison (2)
  • Long-Term

2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 Sedan

(2.3L 4-cyl. Turbo AWD 6-speed Manual)

  • Comparison Test
  • Top 4 Features
  • Data and Charts
  • Editors' Evaluations
  • Final Rankings and Scoring Explanation
  • Second Opinion
  • 2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 Specs and Performance
  • 2008 Subaru Impreza Specs and Performance

Two Affordable Turbocharged Wagons Face Off

Sport compacts have it hard. Cars like the 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX and the 2007 Mazdaspeed 3 — along with competitors like the Honda Civic Si, Mini Cooper S and Volkswagen GTI — are expected to do mutually contradictory things with something approaching perfection. They're supposed to be quick but economical; athletic but comfortable; sporty but practical. Oh yeah, and they can't cost a lot.

Go ahead and dream the impossible dream.

In last year's six-car sport compact comparison test it was the then-new 2007 Mazdaspeed 3 that did the best job of pulling off those tricks. And just behind it in 2nd place was the 2006 Subaru WRX TR. Now, with the 2007 model year dribbling to an end, Subaru has introduced a new 2008 WRX that's both lighter and roomier.

But is it enough to knock the Mazdaspeed 3 off its precarious perch?

Subie Do, Mazda Do, Too
By stretching the Impreza WRX's wheelbase 3.7 inches to 103.1 inches, Subaru has produced a significantly roomier cockpit for passengers. Meanwhile, the new five-door body style (a four-door sedan is also offered) keeps the overall size tidy with minimal overhangs and total length of just 173.8 inches — 2 inches shorter than the 2006 WRX TR four-door sedan. Width remains unchanged at 68.5 inches while overall height has risen from 56.7 to 58.1 inches.

At 3,167 pounds, the all-wheel-drive WRX wagon is only 45 pounds heavier than the 2006 WRX TR and 9 pounds lighter than the five-door Mazdaspeed 3, despite the fact that only the Mazda's front wheels are driven.

This is partially due to the Mazda's slightly larger size. Its wheelbase is 0.8 inch longer than the Subaru's and its total length is 3 inches greater. It's also an inch wider and half an inch taller.

So they're sized about the same inside and out, but under their skins these turbocharged wagons couldn't be more different.

Powerful Arguments
Subaru and Porsche are the only carmakers that still believe in the benefits of the flat engine. The new WRX's turbocharged and intercooled 2.5-liter DOHC 16-valve horizontally opposed four is an updated version of the same engine that's been powering Subarus since Wisconsin was admitted to the union.

Now rated at 224 horsepower at 5,200 rpm (400 rpm earlier than in '07), Subaru has given up a bit of peak power to improve low-end torque, and 226 pound-feet at a mere 2,800 rpm (down 800 rpm from before) is impressive. Bolted to the engine is a five-speed manual transaxle that feeds the Subie's ubiquitous all-wheel-drive system.

In contrast, the Mazdaspeed 3's power plant appears relatively conventional: a turbocharged and intercooled 2.3-liter DOHC 16-valve inline-4. But this is Mazda's Direct Injection Spark Ignition (DISI) engine — the same advanced technology power plant Mazda puts in the larger Mazdaspeed 6 sedan and CX-7 crossover.

Using a direct-injection fuel system, the DISI is rated at 263 hp at 5,500 rpm and 280 lb-ft of peak torque at a measly 3,000 rpm. It's also particularly smooth thanks to a pair of counterrotating balance shafts that knock out most vibrations. It's attached to Mazda's compact "three-shaft" six-speed manual transaxle that supplies power to the front wheels.

Door Handle to Door Handle
The generous torque band and distinctive sound (sort of like a VW Beetle operating underwater — which, in a sense, it is) of the Subaru's flat four are as appealing as ever, but it just doesn't have the same thrust and flexibility of the Mazda motor.

Although the Subaru's 5.9-second 0-60 time is two ticks better than the Mazda's 6.1-second clocking, it's all due to its traction advantage at launch. By the end of the quarter-mile, the two cars are dead even at 14.5 seconds and the Mazdaspeed 3 is going 98.7 mph compared to the WRX at 94.4 mph. Considering the difference in power ratings, none of this is surprising.

The surprise was that this Mazdaspeed 3 was slower than the preproduction Mazdaspeed 3 in last year's comparison test. That car made it to 60 in just 5.9 seconds and traipsed through the quarter-mile in 14.2 seconds at 100.1 mph.

Because this production Mazdaspeed 3 was absolutely brand-new with less than 500 miles on its odometer, it may just be that its engine would loosen up with some mileage and it would get quicker. Or it could be a natural variation because the cars were tested on different surfaces. Or maybe the engineers were just extra, um, attentive to the preproduction car. Feel free to speculate.

Either way, there's no denying the Mazdaspeed 3's torque steer on launch, but in most every other respect, the combination of the DISI's flexible power band and the sure-shifting six-speed gearbox is significantly better — and ultimately quicker — than the Subaru.

Suspension of Disbelief
Sometime during the development process, Subaru decided to skip roll stiffness as part of the WRX's suspension tuning equation. The car has good reflexes, but go into a corner hard enough and by the apex you're half expecting to scrape a sideview mirror off on the tarmac. We also miss the tossability of the old WRX, which has been replaced with understeer.

A new double-wishbone independent rear suspension replaces the struts used on the previous WRX, but the lack of roll stiffness doesn't seem to be isolated to the tail. Instead this seems to be a choice by the engineers to maximize ride comfort at the expense of cornering prowess. As it is, the WRX's 0.81g skid pad and 67.7-mph blast through the slalom are solid, but not up to the Mazdaspeed 3's better 0.86g skid pad twirl and outstanding 69.3-mph slalom performance.

Noticeably stiffer than the WRX without being uncomfortable, the Mazda's turn-in and steering response are among the very best around and the car remains flat even in grossly off-camber corners. This is an excellent-handling machine, but like the Subaru it's not really possible to rotate the car around corners. The levels of adhesion are high enough, however, that the car is absolutely blazing before it heads into understeer.

As in the previous WRX, the new WRX's steering is quick, precise and nicely weighted. The steering is heavier than the Mazda's, but it provides great feedback. Both cars also have effective four-wheel disc brakes and unobtrusive antilock systems. The Mazda took 113 feet to stop from 60 mph while the Subaru needed 121, but both cars would be better with brake pedals that had more progressive actions and more feel.

On a mountain road, the Mazda is fun to toss in a way few other cars priced under $30,000 are. And it's satisfying to drive even slowly.

Everyday Cars for Every Day
Ford's C1 platform underpins the Mazda 3 and Mazdaspeed 3 (as well as Volvo's C30 and S40) and it's the most substantial-feeling compact-car chassis out there. In the Mazdaspeed 3 the ride is stiffer than in other C1s, but it's always poised, even when chucking itself from pothole to road divot to gutter crack. And it's relatively quiet, doing a good job of isolating out most road noise despite the car's relatively large 215/45ZR18 Bridgestone Potenza RE050A summer-spec performance tires.

The WRX, on the other hand, transmits more road noise through its structure, even though less aggressive 205/50R17 Bridgestone Potenza RE92A tires are fitted. The Subaru feels tight and well built, just not as impregnable as the Mazda.

Its lower cowl height, an advantage of that flat engine, gives the WRX better overall visibility than the Mazda, but Subaru didn't press that advantage with the WRX's interior design. Like its exterior, it's somewhat drab and uninspired.

The front seats, for instance, have nicely shaped backs but the seat bottoms are flat and everything is upholstered in two tones: drab gray and drabber black. There's plenty of room for stuff in this logically laid out interior, and the oversize, easily read gauges glow a brilliant red, but no one in there is going to be overjoyed by what they see. At least they kept the tach in the center of the instrument panel, which should keep the faithful satisfied.

Mazda hasn't been shy about decorating the Mazdaspeed 3's interior. There are aluminum covers for the pedals, red accent stitching on the steering wheel and upholstery and the seats have been assertively bolstered for support. Turn on the Mazdaspeed 3's radio and red LEDs light up in sequential celebration of the system's activation. If the Mazdaspeed 3 interior's flamboyance is too much, then maybe the whole car is too flamboyant for you. But it looks like a sporty car's interior. And in practical terms, it's at least as usable for day-to-day tasks as the Subaru.

Price Matters
At just over $25,000, the Mazdaspeed 3 isn't cheap. But the Subaru WRX came in at an as-tested $27,595. Of course the WRX has the advantage of all-wheel drive and if you live in Colorado, New Hampshire or Vermont that can make all the difference come wintertime. Still, if performance-bang-for-your-hard-earned-buck is the bottom line, you'll be better off moving to a warmer climate and buying a Mazdaspeed 3.

It's hard not to be somewhat disappointed by the Impreza WRX. It's a good car, but it's wrapped in lackluster sheet metal and doesn't have the edge it needs to be a consistently entertaining driving companion. Here's hoping the WRX STI that's coming sharpens this car into something spectacular.

Last year the Mazdaspeed 3 rose to be crowned the king of the sport compacts. Its spot on the throne is safe for now.

The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of evaluation.

Sport compacts strive to pack a lot of performance in a package selling for not a lot of money. That means many features found on many more expensive cars are rarities on these price-sensitive machines. Beyond that, additional equipment adds weight to vehicles thereby sapping performance and hurting fuel economy.


2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 2008 Subaru WRX
All-wheel drive N/A S
Mechanical limited-slip differential S N/A
Six-speed transmission S N/A
Xenon headlights S N/A

S: Standard
O: Optional
N/A: Not Available

All-wheel drive: All four of the Subaru WRX's wheels are powered, which means the car has traction in virtually any condition short of being upside down.

Mechanical limited-slip differential: The Mazdaspeed 3's limited-slip differential ensures that power is headed to the front wheel that actually has the traction to use it.

Six-speed transmission: The more gears a transmission has, the closer those gears can be to one another and the more effectively the driver can keep the engine in the meat of its power band. Six-speed manual transmissions are now the standard in this class and the Mazdaspeed 3 has one. The Subaru WRX still has five forward gears.

Xenon headlamps: Xenon high-intensity headlamps emit a bluish white light that many drivers find both brighter and more pleasing. They come standard on the Mazdaspeed 3, while the Subaru doesn't even offer them as an option.

Engine & Transmission Specifications
Warranty Information
Performance Information


Exterior Dimensions & Capacities
2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 2008 Subaru WRX
Length, in. 176.8 173.8
Width, in. 69.5 68.5
Height, in. 57.7 58.1
Wheelbase, in. 103.9 103.1
Curb Weight, lbs. 3,176 3,167
Turning Circle, ft. N/A N/A
Interior Dimensions
2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 2008 Subaru WRX
Front headroom, in. 39.1 40.3
Rear headroom, in. 38.4 37.6
Front shoulder room, in. N/A N/A
Rear shoulder room, in. N/A N/A
Front legroom, in. 41.1 43.5
Rear legroom, in. 36.3 33.5

Engine & Transmission Specifications

Engine & Transmission
2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 2008 Subaru WRX
2.3 2.5
Engine Type Inline-4 Flat-4
Horsepower (SAE) @ rpm 263 @ 5,500 224 @ 5,200
Max. Torque, lb-ft @ rpm 280 @ 3,000 226 @ 2,800
Transmission 6-speed manual 5-speed manual
EPA Fuel Economy City, mpg 20.0 19.0
EPA Fuel Economy Hwy, mpg 28.0 24.0
Observed Fuel Economy combined, mpg 19.1 19.3


Warranty Information
2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 2008 Subaru WRX
Basic Warranty 3 years/36000 miles 3 years/36000 miles
Powertrain 5 years/60,000 miles 5 years/60,000 miles
Roadside Assistance 3 years/36,000 miles 3 years/36,000 miles
Corrosion Protection 5 years/Unlimited miles 5 years/Unlimited miles


Performance Information
2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 2008 Subaru WRX
0-60 mph acceleration, sec. 6.1 5.9
Quarter-mile acceleration, sec. 14.5 14.5
Quarter-mile speed, mph 98.7 94.4
60-0-mph braking, feet 113 121
Lateral Acceleration, g 0.87 0.81
600-ft slalom, mph 69.3 67.7

Evaluation - Drive
Evaluation - Ride
Evaluation - Design
Evaluation - Function

Evaluation - Drive

Overall Dynamics
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.2 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.6 2
Engine Performance
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 9.2 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 2
Transmission Performance
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.0 2
Brake Performance
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.6 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 2
Steering Performance
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.2 2
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 1
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.5 2
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 1
Fun to Drive
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.3 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 6.5 2

Evaluation - Ride

Overall Comfort
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.6 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.0 2
Ride Comfort
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.0 2
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.5 1
Wind Noise
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.4 2
Road Noise
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.0 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.0 2
Front Seat Comfort/Space/Access
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.7 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 6.0 2
Rear Seat Comfort/Space/Access
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.0 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.0 1
Driving Position
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.1 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.0 2

Evaluation - Design

Overall Design & Build Quality
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 9.1 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.4 2
Exterior Design
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 5.0 2
Interior Design
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.2 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 5.5 2
Interior Materials
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 9.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.0 2
Interior Control Tactile Feel
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 9.7 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.2 2
Squeaks & Rattles
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 9.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 9.5 1
Panel Fitment & Gaps
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 9.2 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 9.0 2

Evaluation - Function

Overall Function
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.0 2
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 1
Headlamp Illumination
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 2
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.2 2
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.6 1
Instrument Panel (IP) Layout
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.3 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.7 2
Climate Control Layout
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.3 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.2 2
Audio System Layout
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 6.5 2
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 1
Secondary Control Layout
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 7.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 7.5 1
Interior Storage
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.0 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 1
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.0 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 1
Standard Cargo / Trunk Space
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.5 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.5 1
Maximum Cargo Space
Vehicle Score Rank
2007 Mazda Masdaspeed3 8.0 1
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX 8.0 1

Final Rankings

Final Rankings
Item Weight 2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX
Personal Rating 10% 100.0% 50.0%
Recommended Rating 10% 100.0% 50.0%
Evaluation Score 20% 82.0% 74.9%
Feature Content 15% 75.0% 25.0%
Performance 25% 98.3% 86.1%
Price 20% 100.0% 90.0%
Total Score 100.0% 92.2% 68.2%
Final Ranking 1 2
$25,080 $27,595

Personal Rating (10%): Purely subjective. After the test, each participating editor was asked to rank the vehicles in order of preference based on which he or she would buy if money were no object.

Recommended Rating (10%): After the test, each participating editor was asked to rank the vehicles in order of preference based on which he or she thought would be best for the average consumer shopping in the sport compact segment.

Editors' 23-Point Evaluation (20%): Each participating editor scored every vehicle based on a comprehensive 23-point evaluation. The evaluation covered everything from exterior design to cupholders. A score from 1 to 10 was possible in each category, and the scores listed are averages based on all test participants' evaluations.

Feature Content (15%): For this category, the editors picked the top four features they thought would be most beneficial to the consumer shopping for a sport compact car. For each vehicle, the score was based on the number of actual features it had versus the total possible (four). Standard and optional equipment were taken into consideration.

Performance Testing (25%): Each vehicle was subjected to a set of performance tests that measure acceleration, braking, average speed through a 600-foot slalom course, and lateral acceleration (measured in g) on a 200-foot skid pad. Scores were calculated by giving the best-performing vehicle in each category 100 percent. Subsequent vehicles were awarded points based on how close they came to the top vehicle's score.

Price (20%): Another simple percentage calculation, this one is based on the least expensive vehicle in the comparison test. Using the "as-tested" prices of the actual evaluation vehicles, the least expensive vehicle received a score of 100, with the remaining vehicles receiving lesser scores proportional to the price difference.

Inside Line Editor in Chief Scott Oldham says:
This is an easy one. I like the Mazdaspeed 3 over the new WRX.

It's easy because I liked the Mazdaspeed 3 more than the old WRX and I like the old WRX more than the new WRX. I think that puts the new WRX in 3rd place, but I've lost count.

What I do know is this: The Mazdaspeed 3 costs less than the Subaru, but feels more expensive. It handles better than the WRX, despite its lack of all-wheel drive. It's as quick as the WRX despite its much smaller engine. And it's much better-looking.

The only thing I can think of that the new WRX has over the Mazda is all-weather traction, but I live in Los Angeles, so I don't care. It's sunny here all the time. Plus, the front-wheel-drive Mazda has standard traction control so it'll get you through most Midwest winters.

Now, if you're lucky enough to live where it snows every single day, and you absolutely need all-wheel drive, buy the Subaru. It'll serve you well, get you where you want to go and deliver plenty of fun for your modest investment. Plus, it'll probably be covered in white stuff most of the time, so your exposure to its ugly mug will be minimized.

Or better yet, buy the Mazdaspeed 3 and move to Los Angeles. We've got some great roads here. The kind of winding mountain runs the Mazdaspeed 3 was made for.

Model year2007
ModelMazdaspeed 3
StyleGrand Touring 4dr Wagon (2.3L 4cyl Turbo 6M)
Base MSRP$24,650
As-tested MSRP$25,080
Drive typeFront-wheel drive
Engine typeInline-4
Displacement (cc/cu-in)2300cc (140cu-in)
Horsepower (hp @ rpm)263 @ 5,500
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)280 @ 3,000
Transmission type6-speed manual
Suspension, frontMacPherson strut
Suspension, rearMultilink
Steering typeElectric speed-proportional power steering
Tire brandBridgestone
Tire modelPotenza RE050A
Tire size, frontP215/45R18 Y
Tire size, rearP215/45R18 Y
Brakes, frontFront ventilated disc -- Rear disc
Track Test Results
0-45 mph (sec.)4.1
0-60 mph (sec.)6.1
0-75 mph (sec.)8.7
1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)14.5 @ 98.7
Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)29
60-0 mph (ft.)113
Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)69.3
Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.87
Sound level @ idle (dB)51.5
@ Full throttle (dB)76.5
@ 70 mph cruise (dB)70.3
Test Driver Ratings & Comments
Acceleration commentsThe best launch technique is to rev the engine to about 2,500 rpm and feed in the clutch before going to full throttle. This produces almost zero wheelspin, which is necessary with the 3's massive torque. Wheelspin launches were considerably slower. Upshifting at 6,000 rpm also improved times, as power falls off seriously after that.
Braking ratingGood
Braking commentsConfident pedal feel and effectiveness. Simply stand on the pedal and hold on. We saw marginal improvement as heat increased in the system. No brake fade was noticed in this one-stop-at-a-time test.
Handling ratingExcellent
Handling commentsExcellent balance combined with excellent grip produced impressive numbers on the skid pad and in the slalom.
Testing Conditions
Elevation (ft.)421
Temperature (°F)76.1
Wind (mph, direction)4
Fuel Consumption
EPA fuel economy (mpg)20 city/28 highway
Edmunds observed (mpg)19.1 (combined)
Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)14.5
Dimensions & Capacities
Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3153
Length (in.)176.8
Width (in.)69.5
Height (in.)57.7
Wheelbase (in.)103.9
Legroom, front (in.)41.1
Legroom, rear (in.)36.3
Headroom, front (in.)39.1
Headroom, rear (in.)38.4
Seating capacity5
Cargo volume (cu-ft)16.5
Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)43.3
Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
Roadside assistance3 years/36,000 miles
Free scheduled maintenanceNot Available
Front airbagsStandard
Side airbagsStandard dual front
Head airbagsStandard front and rear
Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
Electronic brake enhancementsBrake assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
Traction controlStandard
Stability controlStandard
Rollover protectionNot available
Emergency assistance systemNot available
NHTSA crash test, driverNot tested
NHTSA crash test, passengerNot tested
NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
Model year2008
Leave a Comment