Skip to main content

Used 2016 Nissan Juke Hatchback Consumer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
16 reviews

See Edmunds pricing data

Has Your Car's Value Changed?

Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.

Price history graph example

Trending topics in reviews

Pros
Cons
4 out of 5 stars

Hidden Gem and Bargain

Dave, 07/31/2020
2016 Nissan Juke NISMO 4dr Hatchback (1.6L 4cyl Turbo 6M)
1 of 1 people found this review helpful

New, much like the S1 or JCW, the Nismo RS version of the Juke doesn't make any sense for the price point However, the Nismo RS has depreciated a significant amount more than competitors in its class. Sure, the Nismo RS isn't remarkably fast, or very comfortable and the design choices really require some getting used to. But for the prices this car is going for, now in 2020, the car is an absolute bargain and truly a hidden gem. The car gets a bad rep because of the CVT AT AWD version. Ignore that car. It won't make you happy. The variant that will make you happy however is the front-wheel drive 6mt version. 218 CV, LSD, Recaro Seats, Bodykit and half decent wheels, Alcantara interior, DAB radio, Bluetooth radio, 360 Camera. Start adding all these features up and try to find something similair at its price point. You won't. You're nearing higher end German SUV's for triple the price. Thing is, SUV's and Crossovers REALLY do not need 500hp under the bonnet. It's absolutely pointless. 218cv matches with a very playful 6 speed manual, is actually absurd value for the money! And most of all, and few people know this, the Juke is extremely lightweight. It's crossover proportions give you the illusion of weight, but its lighter than many many performance hatchbacks.

Safety
4 out of 5 stars
Technology
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Interior
4 out of 5 stars
Comfort
4 out of 5 stars
Reliability
5 out of 5 stars
Value
5 out of 5 stars
Report Abuse

1 out of 5 stars

RIPPED OFF BY NISSAN

PHIL MCRACKIN, 09/08/2016
2016 Nissan Juke SL 4dr Hatchback AWD (1.6L 4cyl Turbo CVT)
9 of 29 people found this review helpful

Dont buy it has the same problem Toyota had with the <p class="MsoNormal">accelorator getting stuck so if you want to die buy </p>

Safety
1 out of 5 stars
Technology
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Interior
1 out of 5 stars
Comfort
1 out of 5 stars
Reliability
2 out of 5 stars
Value
1 out of 5 stars
Report Abuse
2016 Nissan Juke for sale near you
Showing 3 of 13 listings
See all 13 listings

2 out of 5 stars

Just Not That Impressed!

Karin Shuli, 10/06/2016
2016 Nissan Juke SV 4dr Hatchback AWD (1.6L 4cyl Turbo CVT)
4 of 14 people found this review helpful

I test drove Several Hatchbacks. The Juke was quirkey in looks and I liked that. But upon driving it, the handling was sloppy and the headroom was terrible for my boyfriend as a passenger and anyone sitting in the back seat. Also, the Cargo area was not sufficient. I train dogs and not having enough head room for even 2 dogs was a problem. Trying to squeeze in a weeks worth of groceries would not have happened either. For the money, I chose a Jeep Renegade. I'm very happy.

Safety
3 out of 5 stars
Technology
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Interior
3 out of 5 stars
Comfort
2 out of 5 stars
Report Abuse

2 out of 5 stars

Beware

Yvonne, 10/30/2018
2016 Nissan Juke SL 4dr Hatchback AWD (1.6L 4cyl Turbo CVT)
1 of 2 people found this review helpful

Transmission went out at 28,000 miles. It was under warranty but I was expecting to keep this car for years until now...

Safety
3 out of 5 stars
Technology
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Interior
4 out of 5 stars
Comfort
3 out of 5 stars
Reliability
1 out of 5 stars
Value
3 out of 5 stars
Report Abuse

1 out of 5 stars

Cute car but CVT TERRIBLE

Diane, 08/10/2018
2016 Nissan Juke S 4dr Hatchback AWD (1.6L 4cyl Turbo CVT)
1 of 6 people found this review helpful

I had heard that the Nissan Juke was known for its significantly problematic continuously variable transmission (CVT). I really loved the shape and turbo performance of the vehicle, so I bought it and put thousands of saved money towards the purchase. Once the car hit 34,000 miles, the transmission went and had to be replaced. The dealership basically indicated that I was being overly concerned since "it's covered under warranty". Firstly, I like to travel and don't appreciate getting stuck with a broken down car with no working transmission. Secondly, it is great that it's covered under warrantly; however, when I purchase a vehicle, I plan on having it past the 100,000 mile warranty. I've purchased many vehicles in my lifetime and drove them far beyond 100,000 miles. As soon as they replaced the transmission, I traded it in at a different dealership and I made sure that my second new vehicle does NOT have a CVT! They are cheap transmissions. Unfortunately, many new vehicles on the market are using CVTs. I paid a lot of money for a car that I kept for less than 2 years. I say shame on Nissan Motor Company as I do believe they know of this significant issue but continue selling these cars. I contacted Nissan Motor Company, but they couldn't care less.

Safety
5 out of 5 stars
Technology
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Interior
3 out of 5 stars
Comfort
4 out of 5 stars
Reliability
1 out of 5 stars
Value
2 out of 5 stars
Report Abuse
Items per page:
5