2010 Nissan Rogue Consumer Review: Solid car but the A/C is a bit

2010 Nissan Rogue SUV - Consumer Review

Average Consumer Rating

97 Total Reviews

All Models

Build Quality
Reliability Value
Solid car but the A/C is a bit meh
By anders7 on


2010 Nissan Rogue S 4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT)


I bought this car new and was very impressed with the handling - very car like. Fit and finish of the interior is way above the competition (RAV4, CRV etc). The engine is powerful enough and I grew to love the CVT that some people hate. The front seats are very comfy and the few times I get to sit in the back I am comfortable there too. This was the last car on my shortlist and I didn't want to like it but I really did.

12 months later and I still like the car a lot. It is what it is - its a compact SUV crossover with AWD (btw the AWD really does work well in light snow and ice). The visibility out of the back is poor (styling) and the A/C is NOT great for Texas summer. Still like the car.

Best Features

Handling, braking, AWD, interior comfort, CVT(!), build quality, simplicity of engine design, suspension, interior materials, dashboard design, cloth seats quality.

Worst Features

The A/C unit struggles for 10 miles in Texas summer @ 115 degrees. And that is with limo tinted windows. Time for a bigger compressor Nissan - nothing wrong with the current one but it is built for New England, not Texas. Rear visibility - it's pretty bad but that's the price you pay for the styling. Engine - why not drop the V6 into one of these cars? You have the VQDE which is tried and tested. Everyone else has a V6 aside from Honda but they're more arrogant than y'all and don't see the point. Wheels - I have the SL alloys on my S-AWD. They should be standard across the board. Steel wheels are so 1990s...
Recommend (0) (0)

Are you the author of this review?

Update Your Review
Report it
Comments (1) Post a Comment
By longo2
on 09/15/13 09:44 AM (PDT)

You are right about the lack of an engine option. We test drove a Honda CRV with their 4 cylinder and 5 speed a/t, then drove a Rav 4 with Toyotas little V-6 but an outdated 4 speed a/t. If you had the Toyota engine coupled to the Honda 5 speed a/t you would have a winner! Reason I say this is, the Honda 5 speed runs at 1600 rpm at highway speeds, and the Toyota 4 speed with their V-6 keeps the revs to a screaming 2600 at the same speed. You can''t have great mpg's with those kind of rpms on the highway. I have found that a bigger engine with a 5 or 6 speed tranny beats a little 4 cyl anyday. City mpg's would suffer a little but the power for take off on the Toyota V-6 was amazing...the Honda 4 cyl CRV performance was just embarrassing even tho they had the better tranny.

Report it
Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post a comment.


Select a different vehicle  
Recently Viewed
There are no recently viewed vehicles to display

Write Consumer Reviews

Write Consumer Reviews

Write a review and rate your own car.