Used 1994 Ford Ranger Consumer Reviews - 73 Car Reviews | Edmunds

1994 Ford Ranger Consumer Reviews

View reviews for a specific Ranger model:

sort by

Most Recent|
Most Recent Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
why i still drive this truck
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By clem wilsey
on

Vehicle

1994 Ford Ranger XLT 2dr Regular Cab SB


Review

94 ranger 375k miles 2.3 liter 4 cyl. 5 speed manual. in south carolina. only non original parts 1 brake caliper, muffler,clutch replaced at 370k. tires and brake pads plugs and wires still an everyday drive and cant wait for them to be rereleased in 2019 maybe get good trade in on mine.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Ranger first truck
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Chris
on

Vehicle

1994 Ford Ranger XLT 2dr Extended Cab SB


Review

A great first truck. Used it to pull lots of trailers and haul lots of stuff. Needed something bigger so I sold it to a family member and bought an F150.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Reliable workhorse
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Travis
on

Vehicle

1994 Ford Ranger XL 2dr Extended Cab SB


Review

I have the Mazda badged version of the '94 Ranger (B3000), identical except for body cosmetics. Bought it used w/ 75K miles almost 20 years ago, now has 183K. The 3.0 V6 is pretty anemic, especially climbing hills on the freeway (often I have to downshift to 3rd gear), but gets job done. Truck is super reliable -- replaced 5-spd. manual trans at around 130K, because grease monkey at lube joint didn't tighten drain plug, or fill up after draining. Costs: $700 for rebuilt trans found online and $200 installation with mechanic friend. Compare that to the $4K or $5K it takes to replace a modern auto trans in many vehicles. But you can't find manual trans anymore... brakes, shocks, wheel bearings, master cylinder, idler pulley and tires have been replaced -- normal wear and tear for a vehicle this old. I was thinking of getting something newer, but the horror stories of maintenance with these computerized wonders terrifies me ($1500 to fix power sliding doors on minivans, $9K to replace sensor deep in the bowels of a Toyota engine... it goes on and on). I decided to keep this "antiquated" jewel until it collapses into heap of scrap metal -- simplicity and cheap maintenance are values I do not care to sacrifice for any level of costly, power-assisted, processor-driven convenience!


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

I loved mine and wish they still made them.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Jen
on

Vehicle

1994 Ford Ranger XLT 2dr Regular Cab SB


Review

I bought mine new and as a young driver, really put it to the test. It was honestly driven like it was rented--it 'may' have even gone a bit airborne at one point, it was off-roaded plenty, and it really stood up. It hit a deer at highway speed and the body held up -impressively-, just needing a headlight and the grille replaced. It was also rear ended a few times and not only was I never injured, but it rarely needed repairs. It was a small tank. It had the inline 4 engine, manual transmission, and no power windows or locks and it was fun to drive. It had approximately 200K on it when one of the engine cylinders developed a problem but we kept driving it anyway with the three functioning and it did just fine. It was pretty good in weather given it was a 2WD small pickup but it was also pretty reliable. We had to put a new starter into it in later years and at about 180K I think we had to replace a couple of the gears in the transmission and the clutch. The parking brake did go out on it around 200K miles as well as the A/C. The A/C wasn't a big deal because it had the rear slider. One of the leaf springs went when it was around 15 years old and the rear differential was the final nail in the coffin at around 225K miles. It's a great starter vehicle because it takes a BEATING and keeps going. I did a lot of trips that were 3-4 hours long though and it was quite comfortable to ride in. The fuel economy was pretty good, even to the end.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Fair MPG, poor performance
2 of 3 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Doink
on

Vehicle

1994 Ford Ranger XLT 2dr Extended Cab SB


Review

I bought this as a 3rd owner in 2016 with 112k and the only thing that didn't work was the cruise but got it fixed (adjustment cost $40). I keep it around 2500 rpm, windows up and A/C on, and get 21 mpg. The arm rest clasp is broken so it won't stay closed. The paint is holding up great and has no body damage. The interior was very clean, but the headliner had to be replaced. It handles well, rides smooth, and brakes easily. It has terrible acceleration, but the MPG trade off isn't that great. I can tow my filled 5' x 10' trailer like it's not even there. The side view mirrors are too small and the cup holders don't work with most cups.

I replaced the headliner and the cruise control stopped working again. Otherwise, the truck drives as it should and hauls as well as it tows. The MPG is not worth the lost performance.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT