2012 Dodge Durango Consumer Review: Probably the best 3rd-rower, b

2012 Dodge Durango SUV - Consumer Review

Average Consumer Rating

37 Total Reviews

All Models

Build Quality
Reliability Value
10 of 10 people found this review helpful
Probably the best 3rd-rower, but could be better
By luke555 on


2012 Dodge Durango Crew 4dr SUV AWD (3.6L 6cyl 5A)


I looked at all the worthy competitors before settling for the Durango. The Explorer was out quick (cramped interior/3rd row, cumbersome controls), the CX-9 lost on the kids-only 3rd row and boat looks, the Highlander on the smaller size overall, the Pilot on the dismaying interior (especially dashboard), noise, avg. reviews. I almost went for the Traverse, which has more room and sits better on the road given the much wider track, but the interior was a little coarse. The Durango won clearly on the looks (other than the rear), as well as on the better than avg. handling, power, interior. I factory-ordered an awd custom Crew with a bunch of options, black w/ black leather.

Best Features

Front and side muscular yet refined looks; ample power; good, tight handling (easy even for wife); adult-sized 3rd row; sporty-luxurious-refined interior; smaller glazed area in favor of larger sheet metal coverage (possibly resulting in increased impact safety); wheels larger/wider than category; clear navigation system; top, powerful sound system; powerful a/c with outlets throughout; all top safety and tech features (most of them that I'll never use but it's nice to know they're there).

Worst Features

Wider track; 64" is for smaller cars. Many of the suv's above are in the 67's. Why does Dodge make narrow cars? (the Voyager, Caravan too) A benefit might be the lower drag at high speed, but I take stability over that. Related, the rear is too narrow and not up to the overall looks; which goes for the cargo compt., too; 3rd row doesn't fold all flat which causes cargo to slide back. Headrests are not removable(!)- a problem for child seats (in many newer suv's). Side mirror are a little flimsy and don't pivot forward enough to clear obstacles. I so wish I could get a m/t for better mpg's; A/t friction stops these 5000lbs's suv's from even wheeling downhill! Best choice overall still.
Recommend (10) (0)

Are you the author of this review?

Update Your Review
Report it
Comments (1) Post a Comment
By luke555
on 08/20/12 13:18 PM (PDT)

As a correction to the above, I meant the Journey (not the Voyager). Having just taken the vehicle on a 1800 miles trip, I can also report that, overall, it provided a pleasant (mostly freeway) drive. It felt large enough for comfort, height/sight, and relative safety, not too large for handling/agility. The narrowness issue still stands. Wish it was 3" wider and 1" lower. Power was good for passing, though it hesitated by 1 sec. on sudden throttle. Same or longer delays on downshifts for engine breaking; these smart gearboxes are a joke across the board I'd think. Consumption: with a family of 4, with luggage, 90% freeway driving at speeds 65-75 mph, with a few jams, no to moderate wind, fairly flat, some city driving in between, gentle to moderate driving, I got 27.5 mpg. I'd think that one could achieve 28.5 mpg at a constant 55-60 mph.

Report it
Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post a comment.


Select a different vehicle  
Recently Viewed
There are no recently viewed vehicles to display

Write Consumer Reviews

Write Consumer Reviews

Write a review and rate your own car.