Used 2013 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl 6A) Consumer Reviews
The little engine that could
First year of cx-5 production, only 2.0L engine was available. Mazda held back the 2.5L engine until 2014 model (?to get most-efficient gasoline fueled crossover awards?) it was always its weaker point, although with clever engineering, the car would make up the slow starts higher up in the RPM range, and the manual mode made it easier to accelerate from stops / up hills. Only “major” repair was a failed ignition coil on cylinder 4, around 45K miles in, no problems since. All in all, the 2013 CX-5 gave me what it had to give, and was very stable in rain and snow storms. Family grew, and it was time for a beefy three-row (2019 Traverse Premier, Redline Edition.)
- Safety
- Technology
- Performance
- Interior
- Comfort
- Reliability
- Value
Some problems I've had so far
I have a fully loaded 2013 model. KMs not as promised, I do have all wheel drive and don't live on flatlands though. I have had to change so far: GPS - old one turned off for no reason and was always searching for a signal, changed driver mirror, vibrated over 100 km, back up camera, went blank after one week. Current problem - anti lock brakes kicks in at low speed on dry road. Mazda dealer cannot find problem, would no show up on test drive with mechanic. Mirror sensor flashes on left turns, passenger side sensor does not detect sudden lane change from other cars. A/C takes forever to cool car.
- Grand Touring 4dr SUVMSRP: $7,700174 mi away
- Sport 4dr SUVMSRP: $11,500288 mi away
- Touring 4dr SUVMSRP: $8,890193 mi away
My Best Mazda yet !
People consider me fussy in the cars I buy or lease. Since my wife drives a 2010 Mazda Tribute AWD Grand Touring, when it came time for me to select a new car, I traded my Mercedes roadster in on a CX5 AWD Grand Touring after considering a Hyundai Santa Fe and the Kia Sportage. I was specific at the dealer, wanting a white one, Tech Package, all weather floor mats, roof rack, cargo cover, rear bumper guard, etc. They didnt have one but found one in another state and sent a driver to get it for me after I gave them $100 deposit. The next day all the paperwork was completed and they filled it with gas, prepped the vehicle and I took delivery. Im absolutely impressed with the Bluetooth and how it just sucked in my entire phone addresses and how I can make or receive calls while driving. The Tom Tom Nav system is inferior to my portable Magellan and is the only disappointment. Im impressed in the seat comfort, three level heated seats, dual climate control, high intensity headlights and responsiveness of the vehicle. Its beautiful to look at and very stylish with the 19 wheels and black outlining of the wheel openings, dual exhaust with chrome tips as well as the blind spot monitoring system. The availability of having the optional manual shifter is a great extra feature as is the folding 40/20/40 rear seats that are easy to operate. I believe the daytime running lights are a great safety feature as well. All in all, I paid a little too much but am completely satisfied.
The Best of the Mazda 3 and CX-7
I recently purchased a new CX-5 Grand Touring auto. I have owned a Mazda 3 and CX-7. The 3 was a pleasure to drive: peppy, comfortable, great mileage, and quite reliable. The 5, in my opinion retains those characteristics. The new styling and amenities are far superior to those that were included in the 3 and CX-7. The CX-5 seems more compact in design than the 7; however, it has as much or more storage capacity. As noted below the car is somewhat under powered, but is still a zoom zoom car to drive. Mazda has taken the best of the 3 and 7 and produced a really great SkyActiv CX-5.
CX-5 Grand Touring-(27,500 miles) Fun car but underpowered
I think I was the 2nd person to buy in MN because I was waiting for the cx-5 or the escape whichever came first. Bought the car in Feb of 2012 and have really enjoyed the car and now have 27,500 miles on the car. It is fun to drive. The tires are 19 in and were replaced at 23k and are expensive because they are not a popular size. The only problem is it is underpowered with the 2.0 especially pulling out into traffic or having the car loaded with 5 people, almost unsafe. Would not buy this again but would consider the 2014 which has the bigger engine. I get 32 mpg on the highway and 20 or 21 mpg in the city which is a stop light ever mile or so. For a suv we were happy with the mpg.