Used 1992 Ford Ranger Regular Cab Consumer Reviews - 14 Car Reviews | Edmunds

Consumer Reviews

1992 Ford Ranger Regular Cab

Average Consumer Rating

14 Total Reviews

View reviews for a specific Ranger model:

sort by

Most Recent|
Most Recent Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
Ford Ranger XLT 4WD 2 DR. LB w/4.0 V6
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Kenny Barker
on

Vehicle

1992 Ford Ranger Regular Cab XLT 2dr Regular Cab 4WD LB


Review

I kove this truck.Great gas mileage and the engine has a lot of zip.Very fun to drive.


Best Features

Everything about this truck is great. Just a fun truck to drive.


Worst Features

Seat gets uncomfortable after a few hours of driving.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

patricksrating1171
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By paatrick
on

Vehicle

1992 Ford Ranger Regular Cab Custom 2dr Regular Cab SB


Review

I have only had this truck a couple of
months, and I am 3rd or 4th party, but
it is still in excellent condition,
except for a few small scratches, and it
runs great! I told my wife I wouldn't
have another Ford after the '94 Taurus,
except maby a truck, and this little
truck is great so far.


Best Features

Engine and transmission. The combination performs very well togeather.


Worst Features

Seat padding could be better, but I suspect a heavier person had this truck before, as it was a company vehicle.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

It's been a great truck
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Coby
on

Vehicle

1992 Ford Ranger Regular Cab XLT 2dr Regular Cab 4WD LB


Review

I have had only two mechanical
problems with it in 10 years. AC
compressor and front locking hubs. The
2.9 liter 6 has always had enough
power, and I do not understand why
anyone needs the 4 liter engine. I get
22 mpg on the highway. (Automatic
transmission). I have loaded this
truck down on several occasions with
no problem. Towing 2000 lbs you don't
even know it's back there. I
consistantly drive 5 hours at a time
in it and my 6'2" frame gets a bit
stiff, but no permanent damage. Other
than change the fluids, I haven't done
a thing to the engine in 95000 miles.


Best Features

Heavy payload package. Ride clearance. Rides like a truck, not a car. Turning radius. Power steering. Always starts and goes. Great city and country truck.


Worst Features

Front automatic locking hub redesign.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Good commuter, long bed
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By L.A.Pierce
on

Vehicle

1992 Ford Ranger Regular Cab XLT 2dr Regular Cab LB


Review

Truck has generally been
good.Passenger window burst while
under warranty, oil pan gasket slipped
and need to be replaced, rear brakes
exploded (spring?), easy fix, door
pilar is rusting at base, fuel gauge
is not working, original tires lasted
a long time. Don't dare to use the
spare as permanent tire since carrier
cut into side of tire.


Best Features

Small turning radius, easy parking, high seat makes for good visibility. Original radio works fine.


Worst Features

Gains horse power in cool weather, maybe cool the air to the engine in hot weather?


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

92 Ranger
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By DAO
on

Vehicle

1992 Ford Ranger Regular Cab STX 2dr Regular Cab SB


Review

I bought it at 92000 miles, have driven
it to 130300 miles and only had to fix
a small problem with the fan, an exhaust
leak at the muffler, and at 129000 miles
the manual shifter is getting stiff.
I hope the newer models are as good
since I am sure to buy my 4th Ranger.


Best Features

Favorite feature is being able to insert the key turn it, and get to where I am going for 2 1/2 years.


Worst Features

Need to find room for a subwoofer.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT