Used 2014 Ford F-150 Regular Cab Consumer Reviews

List Price Range
$15,799 - $28,995

Used F-150 for Sale
Select your model:
See all for sale
12

Trending topics in reviews

Pros
Cons

Reliable, but there are better options.

John, 10/31/2015
XLT 2dr Regular Cab 4WD 6.5 ft. SB (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
77 of 81 people found this review helpful

I purchased this truck brand new in November of 2014. It was a little spontaneous, but my finances were in order and dealerships were running Black Friday ads featuring very aggressive deals. I assume this was because the all new 2015 aluminum bodies were on their way. Ended up purchasing a $38k for a little over $27k, a deal I could not pass up. Despite what the title says, it is actually a super cab 4x4. I opted for the 3.7L V6 (the non-ecoboost engine.) It's the base engine, but if you just drove it without knowing which engine it had, you would figure it had a V8. In other words, it doesn't feel underpowered. The engine is rated at 302 horsepower which looks impressive on paper. However, the engine creates 278ft/lb of torque. That means that in order for it to generate that much power, the engine must rev very high. (The 302hp rating comes at 6,500 RPM) You really have to press the gas pedal to wake it up. Once you do, it screams with plenty of power. To put this in perspective, a F150 in the 90's with a 5.0 made 275ft/lb of torque. That's just how far technology has advanced that a much smaller engine can do the same work consuming less fuel. My truck in its configuration is rated to tow up to 6,100lbs. If you need more capability than this, or tow frequently, the current 5.0 or 3.5 ecoboost are better choices. They generate 380 and 420 ft/lb of torque, respectively. The tradeoff I made for less capability was more fuel economy. No, I don't expect to buy a truck for great fuel economy. I bought this truck for the 4x4 in the winter and the bed for weekend projects. No need to consume more fuel for more capability that I would never need. The 3.7 offered the best fuel economy of the group, with 16 city, 18 mixed, and 21 highway. This was a real area of disappointment, here. I measure my fuel economy with both trip meters: Trip A is per gas tank, Trip B is per oil change. I did achieve 20.5mpg on a trip from Omaha to KC, but I struggled to ever get 16mpg on any given regular tank. 5,500 miles into my 10,000 mile oil change interval and I'm averaging 15.6mpg. This doesn't even reach the EPA estimated 16mpg for city driving! Yes, I regularly commute in "city" driving, but those miles included at a minimum 30% highway driving. Again, credit to advances in technology, this fuel economy is much improved compared to the old F150 in the 90's with a 5.0 generating the same capability. But compared to other newer engines, like the ecoboost 3.5, the difference in fuel economy is marginal and hardly worth the sacrifice in power and capability. We got hit by a couple of snow storms this past winter and the 4x4 made that a non-issue. Acceleration is great for a base V6 (I can usually keep the RPM's at or below 2,000 RPM for acceleration which should help with engine longevity) Transmission shifts great, doesn't jerk or do anything else annoying as sometimes happens with other cars. Again, this should help with reliability and longevity. Steering and braking are where they need to be. Really enjoy the SYNC system! Always have my iPod hooked up. Only frustration is that sometimes the voice command misunderstands what track I want played, but it's 90% effective. I rarely talk on the phone, but when I do its really convenient having the system automatically stop the music and let me talk hands-free. The sound system could use some improvement. It is weak, but I plan on making some aftermarket adjustments to fix this. This was a great and reliable truck. Never had any mechanical issues with it. However, I was intrigued by Ford's new 2.7 ecoboost engine that they released with the 2015 redesign. Not only does it offer more capability with 325hp and 375 ft/lb of torque, but does so with better fuel economy than my 3.7 v6. (Rated 18 city, 20 mixed, and 23 highway mpg.) So I recently traded in this truck for a new 2016 with the 2.7 as I think this is a much better engine choice for consumers like me. I will review this truck after 10,000 miles like I did for my 2014, but so far the fuel economy is living up to the hype this time. I think the 3.7 is better served as a fleet engine for cheap trucks that are cheap to maintain (i.e. no turbos.)

Safety
Technology
Performance
Interior
Comfort
Reliability
Value
Report Abuse

Actually a SuperCab xlt, option not available

blackhillsron, 07/27/2014
FX4 2dr Regular Cab 4WD 6.5 ft. SB (3.5L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
26 of 28 people found this review helpful

Wow, the 3.5 Ecoboost puts the fun back in the F150, pulls like a diesel, quiet as a mouse, smooth as silk, and the fuel mileage ain't bad either. Brought it home from the dealership this afternoon and might have to spend the night in it to. I pulled some mountains on the way home and with less than 50 miles on it and being as careful as I could, this baby wanted to pull. I can't wait to hook up a camper and meet the competition going over the passes and it's only a 6, must be something magically going on here, thanks Ford, had almost given up on you.

Report Abuse

Great Replacement F150 2014

Dave Kammerer, 05/23/2017
XLT 2dr Regular Cab 8 ft. LB (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
8 of 10 people found this review helpful

Update: I decided to upgrade to 2014 F150 XL Regular Cab V-8 with 5.0 engine. I bought one with a full size bed (8.1'). This vehicle is outstanding. I travel every day and it provides me with dependability as well as comfort. I am getting an average of 13-15 miles per gallon in the city and 19- 21 on the highway. On a trip that I recently took (1,700 miles, with various terrains, tempertures and traffic patterns) I got the following mileage: At 60-70 miles per hour on the highway, I got 20-22 mile as per gallon. At 70-80 miles per hour on highway I got 18-20 miles per gallon. On rural roads at 45 -55 miles I have gotten 23- 25 miles per gallon. I averaged 15 in the city and 20 on the highway. This F150 currently has 85,000 miles on it. It has kept me safe and it has been a work horse so far. I am enjoying the features that my former 1981 F150 didn't have available. I chose this year and model over the current F150 as this has a steel bed. It rides very quiet inside of the cab. It gives me all the features that makes my job easy. It has good acceleration and handles good at higher speeds. I plan to keep this one for a while. My family and friends are in shocked that I would upgrade but are proud of me for getting a great newer truck. I would recommend this model to anyone who wants reliability, dependability, stability and comfort in one vehicle. It is still going strong 7 years later. I have done routine maintance regulary. The only problems have been 1) brake roters were warped and had to be replace. 2) Lose of antifreeze in reserve tank from O ring leaking when cold on the radiator T upper hose. 3)The water pump was wobbling causing hoses to leak and had to be replaced. This seems to be a common issue on these type of hoses in this f150 generation. These issues have been corrected. Overal this truck has been great and continues to get me where I am going.

Safety
Technology
Performance
Interior
Comfort
Reliability
Value
Report Abuse

Brakes are insufficient for weight of vehicle

sam cassidy, 07/18/2017
FX4 2dr Regular Cab 4WD 6.5 ft. SB (3.5L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
12 of 16 people found this review helpful

The rotors warped when the truck was new and with no wear on the brake pads. Dealer turned the rotors and they warped again. Ford refused to replace the rotors. i took it to a repair shop and they installed better rotors and I have had no problem since. Cost $1400. I had other warranty complaints as well. Very poor warranty. Dealer's response was we fixed it like Ford told us to. "Not my problem, talk to Ford." That's Freeway Ford in Denver. Stay clear. buyer beware. I am adding this in 2018. The work I had performed (upgrading the rotors) solved the problem. Ford nor the dealer did nothing to help.

Safety
Technology
Performance
Comfort
Reliability
Value
Report Abuse

3 year owner

Jim Usher, 02/10/2018
XL 2dr Regular Cab 6.5 ft. SB (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
5 of 6 people found this review helpful

Very satisfied.

Safety
Technology
Performance
Interior
Comfort
Reliability
Value
Report Abuse
12
Items per page: