We have two Camry's. The other is a 93
XLE V6. They are both very reliable
and problem free. However I think the
97-2000 have very poorly designed
headlamps. I tried replacing bulbs
without success. It's the receptacle
itself. The '93 puts out 100% more
light than this model. The '97 upper
suspension mounts broke at 100,000
miles. The brakes are not that great,
needs improvement. When tires are less
than 50% tread, the car veers too much
either way depending on the road
grade. No problem with new tires.
Honda's suspention have better
tracking. Will not hesitate to buy
Toyota over Honda....others out of the
Rust free even after all these years
(even on my 93). Even the exhaust pipe
looks new....very rare on a Honda.
Don't know why there so much difference
in rust protection.
I like the overall shape/design of the
97, minus the taillights (except 2001).
Overall fit, especially the doors.
VVTI is long long overdue. Honda's
been at it for 10 years now what's the
matter? i.e. Reliable but low tech
engine. The rear seat's headrests
block backward visibility. Same thing
with those ugly spoilers.
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.