i got this car in august 98. it had a
rough time switching from first to
second gear, (REALLY bad kicking) the
headlights went out from time to time,
and i had to get the radiator replaced
once. but other than that it drove
well. it was comfortable, relatively
quick, and got good mileage. recently,
the transmission went. in the end, i
got 3.5 years out of it- so considering
what i paid id consider that a bargain.
the only downside is it only lasted
90000 miles... my advice: if you were
looking for a short term fix a few
years ago, the 93 taurus may have been
a good choice. but now, their age and
shoddy build probably make them too
much of a maintenance liability to be
worth the trouble.
roomy and comfortable for a small car.
greater than expected performance as
put em' together better! its obvious
from my experience and the reviews of
others that this car is not built to
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.