Skip to main content

Used 1995 Mercury Tracer Sedan Consumer Reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
13 reviews
2

See Edmunds pricing data

Has Your Car's Value Changed?

Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.

Price history graph example

Trending topics in reviews

Pros
Cons
4 out of 5 stars

Excellent Second Car

nyyrule4ever, 06/08/2007
1995 Mercury Tracer 4dr Sedan
1 of 1 people found this review helpful

I bought this car as a second car because I drive a lot and my other car (it's a V8) tends to burn a lot of fuel. I bought this car hoping it would be cheap and reliable transportation and it certainly has lived up to those expectations. It has only had one major problem, and that was mostly my fault. The fuel economy is outstanding. Also, the stereo is a little weak. A cheap upgrade will be in order.

Report Abuse

5 out of 5 stars

great little car

grease mokey, 04/14/2005
1995 Mercury Tracer 4dr Sedan
0 of 0 people found this review helpful

smooth riding car with decent acceleration . no mechanical problems at all just rutine maintenance. freezing cold air conditioning!!! GREAT GAS MILEAGE FOR CITY AND HIGHWAY! all around a very nice affordable car

Report Abuse
3.38 out of 5 stars

Bad transmission

Mehginous, 10/29/2002
1995 Mercury Tracer LTS 4dr Sedan
0 of 0 people found this review helpful

I bought my tracer in 95 I always took my car to the dealers to get serviced. They messed up my brakes and they told my nothing was wrong with my transmission for 2 years including a week before they told me I would have to pay $3000 to replace the tran, I ended up taking it to mechanic who rebuilt for $1500. Ford\Mercury refused to help pay for my tran. even though I had told them about tran problems while the car was under warrenty the tran broke 2 months after the warrenty ended. I also had an alternator break at about 50k. Despite these problems the tracer has I would say the car's biggest problem has been it manufacuter ford\mercury

Report Abuse

2 out of 5 stars

Below Average

Mecuryburn, 02/07/2003
1995 Mercury Tracer LTS 4dr Sedan
0 of 0 people found this review helpful

I'd caution against purchasing a Merc that is more than 3 years old. For the first few years, I had no problems whatsoever. The best attribute of the Tracer is that it is cheap. My car finally went after about 5 years of regular usage (also regular maintenance, oil change, etc.)I also had to replace a timing belt, and the air bag partially detonated causing a loud and embarrassing squeak on long turns. Since not all of us are getting a big slice of that mega tax break, perhaps there is still a market left for this vehicle. I'd say if you still have options, look past the Tracer and get your money's worth on a better car.

Report Abuse

4 out of 5 stars

Reliable after 7 years

Illinois, 05/22/2002
1995 Mercury Tracer 4dr Sedan
0 of 0 people found this review helpful

I've had my '95 Tracer (Trio version) for almost seven years and three problems - the a/c compressor broke, but during the warranty period, so Ford fixed it. It had a vacuum leak just this year, which wasn't a major expense to fix. The parking break broke - you can engage it, but it won't dis-engage. No rust, no broken or lose parts. the interior has held up very well. The seats don't look worn. It has been a reliable car, considering it's a Ford.

Report Abuse
2
Items per page:
5