Used 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Consumer Reviews
Used Range Rover Evoque for sale
See Edmunds pricing data
Has Your Car's Value Changed?
Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.
We have a limited number of reviews for the 2017 Range Rover Evoque, so we've included reviews for other years of the Range Rover Evoque since its last redesign.
Range Rover Evoque Worst Purchase Ever Made
R & F, 10/02/2019
2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SE 4dr SUV AWD w/Premium Package (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 9A)
8 of 8 people found this review helpful
Bought this 2016 Evoque back in 2016. It happened to be one of there So called well taken care of courtesy vehicles. Nothing but issues since the date of purchase. Was in the shop more than any vehicle I"ve ever owned. The sensor went... out ya know the brains of the vehicle! Ever since then it wasn't right even after they replaced it. Turbo lag. The power lift gate would never close all the way with one bag of groceries in the back hatch. Hated this car. Now I have a 2019 Chevy LT Tahoe and I love it. Nothing like a Chevy.
- Safety
- Technology
- Performance
- Interior
- Comfort
- Reliability
- Value
Shame on Land Rover
Rick, 01/07/2018
updated 07/09/2018
2017 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SE Premium 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 9A)
66 of 78 people found this review helpful
10 months owned, only 4500 miles, wife does not feel safe transporting grand children to nursery school, truly hates This vehicle. The ‘remote start’ feature is not on the key, ‘remote start’ Only works by iPhone app, has only a 25 percent reliability, and when it does start it does not turn on the climate control; so the vehicle is hot on warm days but more uncomfortably, it is very cold on cold days. A premium ‘cloth’ seat package would be helpful. The seat belts are difficult to reach between the seat and the door; also they are very difficult to get down to the latch/receptacle between the center console and the seat. There is a bright metal strip along the dashboard that reflects sun into the eyes of the front passenger. The tires need to be refilled every 60 days, the wheels are easily damaged due to a poor choice of tires, those wheels will collect snow/ice and will cause a very unsafe ‘bounce’ at 25 mph as they rotate out of balance. Shopping packages and contents will fall out of the vehicle as the lift gate opens. Front brakes are making a medium-pitched ‘howl’ sound, or is it from the back brakes? The value of this 2017 Land Rover Evoque has dropped $14,000 after only 4480 miles on the odometer. Have been asking Land Rover for help pleasantly, do not want to be put on a “forum” to evaluate future Land Rover vehicles, would like to receive a proper response from Land Rover … WTF !! Where is the customer service? “Happy Wife Happy Life” is not working here. Update: Two visits back to salesperson, three service department visits ( loaner car given), at least 40 Emails and verbal communications with Land Rover Corporate about the continued problems ... Then, the wonderful and persistent “customer care representative” from Land Rover corporate” made good. A total of 15 months passed … received a call from the Land Rover dealership General Manager, had a brief discussion to confirm the dissatisfaction and unresolved problems with the 2017 Evoque vehicle, two weeks later a refund check was issued less a prorated use cost (which was reasonable). The vehicle was turned back to that Dealer and the check was received. The “experience” has come to an end. .
- Safety
- Technology
- Performance
- Interior
- Comfort
- Reliability
- Value
2017 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque for sale near you
Showing 3 of 24 listings
- HSE Dynamic Convertible SUVMSRP: $26,590110 mi away
- HSE 4dr SUVMSRP: $17,99588 mi away
- SE Premium 4dr SUVMSRP: $10,995184 mi away
See all 24 listings
Not that impressed ! 11 month update!
James, 08/05/2015
updated 08/05/2016
2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure Plus 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 9A)
27 of 31 people found this review helpful
Okay, never wrote a review before so here it goes, I hope this helps others. I'm comparing our new 2015 Range Rover to our 2013 GLK 350. They both costs us about the same. We wanted to try the new Range Rover this time around. Let's start with the outside, we love the look however, no roof racks. You have to buy them at about $1400. The GLK looks like a family car while the Rovers lines look clean and stylish. The cargo door opens with the remote however, you have to push the button on the tailgate to make it close. The GLK you can just use the remote to open or close. The interior, the cargo bay is a lot smaller then the GLK. The driver seat feels okay not great. The finish work inside compared to the GLK , the GLK wins hands down. The steering wheel feels off, not sure why just yet. I can't put it into words, it just feels off. The sound system lacks just about everything, don't plan on rocking out while driving. The take off is good for a 4 banger, yet the transmission shifts hard in and out of gear at times. The interior noise level is a lot louder then the GLK. The GLK has a nice wood finish while the rover is plastic. The backup camera sucks! seriously guys you need to give this some real attention. The ride? This is where the rover is really lacking when comparing it to the GLK. If you hit a good size dip in the road plan on losing your back molars, felt more like a tank then a luxury rover. I'll update this after I take it off road. The rover feels light and you feel more of the road while the GLK is a much smoother ride. The navigation? This is a 50/50 the GLK navigation has no clue what I'm saying and there has been more then one time when I wanted to tear it out of the car over frustration. The rover map it tough to follow because it show you going north, south, east or west and you can get spun around looking at the map. The controls on the steering wheel are terrible on the rover. Don't push too hard on the volume or you will change the radio station, very frustrating, and no mute button. The back window is tough to see out of. The lane assist is on the weak side. The GLK makes a noise inside if you try to change lanes with a car in the blindspot, the rover just blinks,,the GLK one has saved my bacon more then once. The rover does have sensors that let you know you are too close in the front and rear while parking. The GLK does not, if it did my wife would not have backed into another car! The Bluetooth for your phone. Your really going to have to have some patients with the rover, you say a command, the command comes up on the screen and it ask you is this the correct command, it takes forever to get though the commands to make one call. The GLK just say a name and it makes the call. Feels like talking to a 5 year old with the rover, don't have too much coffee when asking the rover to make a call or you may end up losing it? this clearly needs some work. So why did we buy the rover? I lease a new car every 30 months and we really wanted to try the new rover. The new GLK won't be out until 2016 and I never want the first year of a completely new car. Just from the two weeks having the new rover and driving both side by side I'll most likely go back to another GLK after this lease is up. Glad this is my wife's car! Update after 11 months. Off road? It is very capable, my only complaint was all the cameras coming on, this is a great feature I'm just not sure how to use it yet. We were having a warning message coming saying all wheel drive not working, after four times in the dealership they got it fixed. The key fob stop working one day and I was stranded with no way to start the car. They sent a tow truck, at least their services department is on it and will take good care of you. As I mention previously the GPS in the rover sucks! I cannot tell you how many times it has taken me the long way or in the wrong direction completely. Rover services said there is nothing they can do to fix it. Rattles? This thing has on and off rattles that are driving me crazy. And I mean crazy! I take it in for them to find and fix and it won't do it for the dealership. It sucks gas likes it's free. Other then the cool factor of the body I'll be leasing another Mercedes-Benz once our lease is up. Sorry rover, you guys need to work on your finished product a little better. For the same price I can get a better product. I feel if they make some corrections this could be a great SUV. Hope this helps others
- Technology
- Performance
- Interior
- Comfort
- Reliability
- Value
Stylish
PJ, 10/05/2017
updated 04/16/2019
2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure Plus Corris Grey Special Value Edition 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 9A)
12 of 13 people found this review helpful
I would suggest that you shop around. The dealership that I went to was excellent. I went out of state, more than an hour and a half from where I live. I cannot tell you the difference in treatment I was afforded. The vehicle itself is overall a great vehicle to drive. I previously owned a lr2 before I purchased my evoque. I have not had any serious issues. My 2 wheel traction lights has come a couple of times while I was driving and has caused the vehicle to slow down to a stop. So far Land Rover dealership, near me, has not been able to find out what the issue is. I think it is a nice vehicle overall.
- Safety
- Technology
- Performance
- Interior
- Comfort
- Reliability
- Value
Range Rover vs. Porsche Macan
Bruce, 10/03/2015
2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque HSE 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 9A)
66 of 79 people found this review helpful
I test drove the Range Rover and the Porsche Macan. I couldn't justify paying 10K extra for the Porsche Macan. Sure the Porsche's engine was strong and had better pick up and felt expensive but was it worth 10K more. I really like my red Eovque and it gets a lot of great looks and compliments. I would like the pick up to be a little faster in the Evouqe but given the recent news about VW, I would give up power for better emissions. The interior is very nice and feels classy. i acutally had to read the owner's manual from almost front to back to understand all the features. The SUV looks comparably small compared to other SUVs and lack of trunk space is noticable (i had a Audi Q5 before). Overall I am very satisfy with this purchase. i probably paid too much for it but oh well.
- Safety
- Technology
- Performance
- Interior
- Comfort
- Reliability
- Value