Used 2003 Chevrolet S-10 Regular Cab Consumer Reviews
Used S-10 for sale
See Edmunds pricing data
Has Your Car's Value Changed?
Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.
2003 S-10 LS 2 dr
bdjr-s10, 05/21/2007
2003 Chevrolet S-10 2dr Regular Cab LS Rwd SB (2.2L 4cyl 5M)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Bought brand new in June 2003, excellent value at time of purchase. Initially was a temporary replacement for my daily driver that needed transmission repair and planned to sell after 2 years of use but was extremely satisfied with overall performance, average 24-25 mpg and cheap maintenance. No breakdowns in 4 years, 50k miles that I held off selling and may just keep until another great deal comes along.
I love my 95 s-10 4 cyl, normal cab
Casey Buck, 10/26/2003
2003 Chevrolet S-10 2dr Regular Cab Rwd SB (2.2L 4cyl 5M)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
I actually bought the truck in mid 99. I have taken good care of the truck and it has taken great care of me. When I bought it, it had 88800 miles now it has 183200, with almost no problems. I replaced the water pump, the upper radiator hose twice( a 10 minute job) and just normal maintence. I never replaced the clutch, I dont think it is original, but it might be. It runs so nice still. It doenst burn or leak a drip of oil. I got it when I was 17, Im now almost 22. It starts up just the same way as the first day I drove it. It is not really fast, but thats ok. It has decent torque. I even delivered pizzas with it for a long time, and it was always great.
2003 Chevrolet S-10 for sale near you
Showing 3 of 4 listings
- Base Regular CabMSRP: $16,490864 mi away
- Base Regular CabMSRP: $12,9991,401 mi away
- Base Regular CabMSRP: $5,9991,684 mi away
See all 4 listings
The S-10
S-10 Owner, 11/29/2002
2003 Chevrolet S-10 2dr Regular Cab LS Rwd SB (2.2L 4cyl 5M)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
It is a simple truck and I recommend it only for commercial usage for it is not a family car (truck). It is not entirely good looking but once again, this truck is not for the style, but for the dirty and tough jobs. It is like a Blazer minus 3 seats and 1/2 of the roof. Has an old body design (dated back to about 1995). Oh yeah, there is one more thing, check out on this site the 2004 Chevy Colorado.
Great little truck
dlr, 01/31/2005
2003 Chevrolet S-10 2dr Regular Cab Rwd SB (2.2L 4cyl 5M)
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
I have owned small trucks for 30 years, starting with Datsun, 2 Mazdas, a Toyota, and now an S-10. This truck has been great so far....everything works, it's economical (over 23mpg in town, with canopy), very comfortable (I'm 6'1", 250lbs), and fun to drive. The rig also came with more accessories as standard then any other truck I've owned. I used my GM card to discount it to $8000 cash....I have been offered more than I paid for it by my brother, who is also impressed. The last small truck I had was a '90 Toyota, which was a great little truck too, but didn't have near the amenities and cost $7000 in '90 (after much haggling with the dealer). The Mazda's scored less-so.
Dependable Truck
David, 01/22/2005
2003 Chevrolet S-10 2dr Regular Cab LS Rwd SB (2.2L 4cyl 5M)
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Have enjoyed this truck since purchasing. Ride is good for a truck, handles well, good gas mileage. Performs adequately on flat or rolling hills unless you are on an interstate. Do not get the 2.2L 4 cyl engine if you live in the mountains or hilly country. Also bad glare from instrument panel at night on back window. Would buy this truck again but with an engine upgrade. Never had one problem after leaving the dealership.