1997 Toyota Camry Consumer Review: Not all used cars are the same
ADVERTISEMENT

1997 Toyota Camry - Consumer Review

Average Consumer Rating

117 Total Reviews

All Models

Performance
Comfort
Fun-to-Drive
Interior
Exterior
Build Quality
Reliability Value
Not all used cars are the same!
By Celine Longman on

Vehicle

1997 Toyota Camry LE 4dr Sedan

Review

We have two Camry's. The other is a 93
XLE V6. They are both very reliable
and problem free. However I think the
97-2000 have very poorly designed
headlamps. I tried replacing bulbs
without success. It's the receptacle
itself. The '93 puts out 100% more
light than this model. The '97 upper
suspension mounts broke at 100,000
miles. The brakes are not that great,
needs improvement. When tires are less
than 50% tread, the car veers too much
either way depending on the road
grade. No problem with new tires.
Honda's suspention have better
tracking. Will not hesitate to buy
Toyota over Honda....others out of the
question.

Best Features

Rust free even after all these years (even on my 93). Even the exhaust pipe looks new....very rare on a Honda. Don't know why there so much difference in rust protection. I like the overall shape/design of the 97, minus the taillights (except 2001). Overall fit, especially the doors.

Worst Features

VVTI is long long overdue. Honda's been at it for 10 years now what's the matter? i.e. Reliable but low tech engine. The rear seat's headrests block backward visibility. Same thing with those ugly spoilers.
Recommend (0) (0)

Are you the author of this review?

Update Your Review
Report it
Comments (0) Post a Comment
Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post a comment.

Register

ADVERTISEMENT
Select a different vehicle  
Recently Viewed
There are no recently viewed vehicles to display
ADVERTISEMENT

Other Vehicles to Consider

ADVERTISEMENT

Write Consumer Reviews

Write Consumer Reviews

Write a review and rate your own car.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT