Used 2012 Cadillac SRX Performance SUV Review
Consumer reviews
Read what other owners think about the 2012 Cadillac SRX Performance SUV.
Most helpful consumer reviews
Loving it !
f430monza, Toledo, OH, 12/04/2011
2012 Cadillac SRX Performance 4dr SUV (3.6L 6cyl 6A)
After test driving over 10 cars, I kept on coming back to this one. I drove the 2011 and agree with the comments about it being under powered. Mind you the 3.6 is no Ferrari, but at least the engine doesn't seem stressed under hard acceleration. Even with the 20 inch rims, the car sacrifices little interior noise. Reasons for buying this car vs competitors: Q5- RELIABILITY ( we've had 6 … Audis/VW- ALL HAVE BEEN A HEADACHE)
GLK- Too small inside. Lexus RX- Too Boring to look at and drive. Evoque- nice, but see Q5 comments and multiply that by 20= Land rover.
No brake Cadi!
Ghost brakes , Dallas, TX, 11/26/2019
2012 Cadillac SRX Performance 4dr SUV (3.6L 6cyl 6A)
A lot of road noise with expensive tires on it. Also the brakes GIVE OUT when they feel like it. Had it brought to shop and of course they couldn’t find anything AGAIN. Driving with the grandbaby and guess what....NO BREAKS AGAIN. Dealership can not find a problem. You pay for the NAME👎🏻
Edmunds Summary Review of the 2012 Cadillac SRX Performance SUV
Pros & Cons
- Pro:Abundant features
- Pro:capable handling
- Pro:classy cabin design
- Pro:smart infotainment interface.
- Con:Limited backseat headroom
- Con:compromised outward visibility.
Full Edmunds Review: 2012 Cadillac SRX SUV
Edmunds Insurance Estimator
The Edmunds TCO® estimated monthly insurance payment for a 2012 Cadillac SRX in Oklahoma is:
not availableLegal