Used 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Consumer Reviews - 12 Car Reviews | Edmunds

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Consumer Reviews

View reviews for a specific Range Rover Evoque model:

sort by

Most Recent|
Most Recent Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
Great Baby Range
1 of 2 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By DMV Driver
on

Vehicle

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Prestige Premium 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 6A)


Review

Pros: Stylish, Build Quality, Amazing sound system, automated parking system is fantastic, ride/handling, decent fuel economy, off road capability, curb appeal, 70k miles so far with very few issues, JLR service is great, headlight performance. Cons: Questionable longevity/reliability, TURBO LAG, fuel economy is decent could be better (my 330hp AWD Infiniti get same fuel economy), had 2 issues unresolved (they went away or couldn't be repeated), maintenance is a bit pricey.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Exceeded my expectations!
2 of 3 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Gene
on

Vehicle

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Prestige Premium 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 6A)


Review

When we purchased the Evoque on 2013, it was a replacement for my wife's car and she fell in love with the design of the Evoque. I was skeptical because I had read that Range Rover had a uncertain maintenance and reliability history. I am pleased to say that we have had absolutely no issues with the vehicle (65,000 miles) and the car has proven to be fun to drive. Also, the controls and technology are very user friendly - I love the touch controls. Overall, very satisfied with the choice.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Buyer Beware (!)
12 of 13 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By J. Jackson
on

Vehicle

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure Plus 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 6A)


Review

Absolutely do not consider purchasing this vehicle. I purchased in DEC 2015 with app. 35k miles. I was unaware several repairs had already been made. The vehicle required major engine work in JUN 2015. The vehicle completed stalled while parked and I was stranded for 3 days our of state. It then stalled with zero electric while I was driving less than a couple of weeks later and after over a week and a half is still in repair at dealer.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Don't Buy!
22 of 23 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By chene91@gmail.com
on

Vehicle

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 6A)


Review

What a nightmare so far owning my 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque!

I am just shy of 2 months owning the vehicle for 3 years and oh my what a terrible experience I have had with the car. The car is also nearing 40,000 miles.

So far what has gone wrong with the car:

@ 07000 miles the radiator started leaking coolant
@ 11000 miles both front wheel arch molding popped out needed to be replaced.
@ 12000 miles Engine check light on, sensor replaced
@ 12005 miles Engine check light on again (yes the very next day) said the crankshaft/piston was not working properly, had to get it replaced.
@ 13000 miles tail lights started to fog up, both tail lights replaced
@ 18000 miles head light not working, replaced headlight
@ 21000 miles same head light not working again!
@ 25000 miles power lift gate stopped working, reprogrammed.
@ 28000 miles engine check light on, turbo failed, brand new turbo was replaced.
@ 30000 miles rear wheel arch molding came loose again replaced new
@ 33000 miles car says coolant level low, topped of coolant
@ 35000 miles car says coolant level low again! This time replaced brand new radiator
@ 38000 miles car says coolant level low, topped of coolant
@ 38500 miles car says coolant level low, topped of coolant
@ 39500 miles car says coolant level low, dealer saying was leaking coolant! replaced piping / seals
@ 39505 miles (yes the very next day) airbag light came on!
@ 39700 miles (today) the infotainment console is not turning on!

I'm sure I'm missing out on a whole lot more times I had to visit the dealership! but on paper that's 17 times to the dealership for faults and repair! if you average it out that means a trip to land rover dealership every other month!

talk about reliability! after the warranty expires I must sell the vehicle because of all these problems! A very bad bad experience on my first new car!

At least the dealership didn't have a bad attitude with whole situation! or else I will be very angry!


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

If you want to throw you're money away - buy one!
10 of 11 people found this review helpful
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Unsatisfied consumer
on

Vehicle

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure 4dr SUV AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 6A)


Review

Purchased my 2013 Range Rover Evouque in August, 2015 with approximately 45,000/miles. No Carfax notification regarding the Turbo that had already been replaced in the TWO years the previous owner owned the vehicle, while under warranty. Land Rover Corporate REFUSES to pay for the replacement of the Turbo that has gone AGAIN and won't acknowledge that it is a known issue with the vehicle. Very, very disappointed in their stand to NOT warrant their product. I was given every excuse in the book from Corporate as to why this is my issue, not a faulty vehicle or faulty part issue. A bunch of crap for a very expensive vehicle!! I've had better luck with Lincoln and Audi - and I'll go back to a company that stands by their product. Customer service from Corporate is non existent - they read from a script.

Needless to say I will NEVER purchase again from Land Rover, and look forward to the day I no longer own it.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT