2013 Ford Focus Consumer Review: The Focus SFE is a Fuel Sipper
ADVERTISEMENT

2013 Ford Focus - Consumer Review

2013 Ford Focus

Average Consumer Rating

99 Total Reviews

SE Sedan (2.0L 4-cyl. FFV 5-speed Manual)

Performance
Comfort
Fun-to-Drive
Interior
Exterior
Build Quality
Reliability Value
11 of 11 people found this review helpful
The Focus SFE is a Fuel Sipper
By cadrvr4 on

Vehicle

2013 Ford Focus SE 4dr Sedan (2.0L 4cyl 5M)

Review

We purchased a 2013 Ford Focus SFE in September 2012 and have driven it 1,200 miles so far. No problems at all.

This model is a Focus with SE trim to which the optional SFE (Super Fuel Economy) package is added. For 2012 the SFE package cost $495. For 2013 the SFE package adds only $95 to the cost of the vehicle making the additional fuel savings over the SE a no-brainer.

We recently got 42 MPG on 70-mile highway trip. 32-33 MPG is typical for our combined driving.

The dual clutch transmission (DCT) drives like an automatic transmission but is actually a fuel-saving automated manual transmission.

Great materials, inside and out: best in class.

LLR tires by Continental handle very well.

Best Features

SFE adds this to the SE trim: Aerodynamic rear deck spoiler, aerodynamic flat wheel covers and steel wheels, low rolling resistance (LLR) tires, disc brakes on all four wheels, SFE badge on trunk. MPG is improved to 28/33/40, a 2 MPG gain over the SE model. 2 MPG may not sound like a lot but it adds up over time. The SFE package is available only on the Focus SE Sedan with DCT (automatic transmission). SYNC system works great with the smart phones. With discs brakes all around the SFE has excellent braking. Snappy handling. Acceleration with the 2.0L engine is excellent with great MPG at 65 MPH. The DCT shifts smoothly. Looks like the 2012 software issues have been ironed out.

Worst Features

The interior could use a few more storage cubbies but this is a minor issue.
Recommend (11) (0)

Are you the author of this review?

Update Your Review
Report it
Comments (1) Post a Comment
By cadrvr4
on 10/26/12 12:25 PM (PDT)

Whoops, acronym confusion. Should be LRR for low rolling resistance.

Report it
Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post a comment.

Register

ADVERTISEMENT
Select a different vehicle  
Recently Viewed
There are no recently viewed vehicles to display
ADVERTISEMENT

Other Vehicles to Consider

ADVERTISEMENT

Write Consumer Reviews

Write Consumer Reviews

Write a review and rate your own car.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT