Used 2008 Mazda CX-9 Consumer Reviews
Used CX-9 for sale
See Edmunds pricing data
Has Your Car's Value Changed?
Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.
Awesome, almost perfect family vehicle!!
wilsonclan, 09/11/2007
2008 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring 4dr SUV AWD (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Picked it up last week. Waited specifically for the 08 and the 3.7 engine, worth the wait for sure. Power really comes on strong now for passing. Perfect blend of utility and performance, blast to drive. Comfort has been excellent so far, no complaints from rear seat passengers, plenty of room all around. Most of the upscale features one would expect for the money. Fit and finish exceptional. More quiet than the Infiniti we just turned back in from lease. Where we live there haven't been many running around on the roads yet, which doesn't bother me at all, who wants to see what you're driving on every corner. Adds a level of exclusivity!
A Wise Choice
dbal72, 10/15/2009
2008 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring 4dr SUV AWD (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Purchased my 2008 GT AWD in August of this year w/ 9k miles on it. It replaced our 2006 Chrysler T&C Van. My wife absolutely loves the CX9. I drive a 05 Audi A4 Quattro w/ sport pkge and I am amazed at how well the Mazda handles and drives for a larger heavier vehicle. If you need 3 rows of seats and don't have to have sliding doors, then make sure you drive one of these before purchasing anything else. We test drove 10 different crossovers and SUV's and kept going back to the Mazda. I also drove the Touring model. The GT does not ride that much firmer for how much better it handles and looks. Love the sliding 2nd row for entry/exit and the legroom. Ours is loaded and we love it.
2008 Mazda CX-9 for sale near you
Showing 3 of 63 listings
- Touring 4dr SUVMSRP: $5,200111 mi away
- Grand Touring 4dr SUVMSRP: $6,500139 mi away
- Sport 4dr SUVMSRP: $4,900149 mi away
See all 63 listings
Zoom Zoom
brianm1962, 04/04/2009
2008 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring 4dr SUV AWD (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Mazda CX-9 replaced a Volvo XC-90 in September 2008. We have been very pleased - especially with the V6 performance (note 2008 is larger engine than 2007) and comfortable yet sporty ride (even with 19" wheels) . Nav is very good. Bose stereo is pretty good, but not as good as some other high-end factory audio systems. All weather mats from the factory sit flat on the ground and don't really catch the snow and water very well. Volvo is the king of seat design, and it is too bad that Ford didn't steal more of this technology to give to Mazda. Gas mileage is reasonable for a truck this size. Tons of room.
What a great CUV
Jb, 11/24/2008
2008 Mazda CX-9 Touring 4dr SUV AWD (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
We bought this vehicle for my wife, she was looking for a spacious crossover to upgrade from her VW Passat for our 2 active boys. We looked at the Ford Edge, Nissan Murano, and Mazda CX-7. The Edge was just boring to drive, the Murano was our second fav pick, but too pricey and significantly smaller. We were most surprised though about the difference between the CX-7 & the 9. The fit and finish of the 9 seemed significantly better than the 7. Both are fun to drive, the 7 has serious zoom-zoom, but for a bigger vehicle, the 9 does as well. For overall look and utility, the 9 was the hands down winner for us.
Best of the Third Row Seat SUV Bunch
TimC, 10/08/2008
2008 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring 4dr SUV AWD (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
After considering the Highlander, MDX, Pilot, and Enclave, my wife and I settled on the CX-9. While not quite perfect for our needs, it was clearly the best overall SUV, and came out on top for functionality, ergonomics, and as a bonus, it didn't look like the box that a more attractive vehicle came in. We had only looked at the Mazda as an afterthought, figuring we'd end up with the Highlander, but were very surprised at the overall quality and attention to detail in the CX-9. While the Highlander had arguably better performance and interior storage space, it lacked many things the CX-9 offered, such as a split-row third seat and ample room in all three rows, among others. A very good buy.