The Volt as Lightening Rod


Chevrolet Volt

Bob Lutz is in Forbes this week, taking various media outlets to task for picking on the Chevy Volt. (Fox News, in particular.) I have to admit, I am something of a Bob Lutz fan. He says what he thinks, which is rare in the auto business these days. We agree on many things, but when we don't, we can exchange views candidly and move on.

He is right that the Volt is being set upon as a symbol of the GM bailouts. And he is also correct in pointing out that the Volt was around long before most folks even had any whiff of a financial crisis.

But, it is also true that GM went out of its way to put the Volt front and center during its campaign for government cash. Rick Wagoner even went so far as to drive a prototype to Washington. (After the visit in the corporate jet didn't go so well.)

President Obama, when visiting Detroit, notably wanted to see where Volts were manufactured.

The government did not "make" GM build the Volt. On the other hand, cancelling it — which might have been financially prudent during the bankruptcy — would have been politically tone deaf. (Both rescued automakers were under pressure to demonstrate that they embraced environmental sensibilities.)

Let's not forget tax credits offered on the Volt and similar vehicles. In California, Volt buyers, who typically have incomes well into the six figures — rich, by government standards — are happy to talk about the $7,500 tax credit from the federal government, the $2,500 from the state, and the free high-capacity charger from the local utility. (Along with discounted electricity to boot.) All of this is sure to rile fiscal conservatives, but a deeper look would reveal that much of this can be traced back to the Bush administration.

So it is not entirely surprising that the Volt is something of a lightening rod.

What is surprising is that more Volts aren't being sold. Having spent some time with one, I can tell you that it is an interesting vehicle. And yet, the market segment for vehicles with advanced powertrains continues to be dominated by Toyota's Prius. (By dominate, I mean that typically 75% of ALL advanced powertrain vehicles sold are Prius models.)

There are lots of new examples of advanced powertrain vehicles coming to market. The thinking seems to be that with all these new choices, sales are sure to expand.

Maybe.

But what if the market segment for these vehicles is fairly fixed in size? By this I mean that as more get introduced, the slices of share get ever smaller. Looking at the income profile of Volt buyers, for example, would suggest that these buyers could just as easily afford a Fisker or Tesla S as an alternative.

One thing about the Prius that is hard to emulate: It has become "the" alternative powertrain vehicle, as opposed to "an" alternative powertrain vehicle.

Something similar existed for Cadillac until the late Seventies. When someone bought their first Cadillac, it was a recognized symbol that the new owner had achieved "success."

The point being that vehicles are often symbols. And for symbols to work, they have to be widely recognized. Cadillac was at one time a recognized symbol of success. Toyota's Prius is another kind of symbol. One that says that it's owner cares about the environment.

The number of consumers who want their vehicle to be this particular symbol is limited. (And the Prius seems to be their default choice.)

For the Volt (and others) the challenge is to become relevant to buyers who want their vehicle to be about more than symbols.

Comments

  • tysalpha tysalpha Posts:

    The Volt was given to the wrong brand. Chevrolet's brand personality and promise is all about freedom, capabilities, ruggedness. The type of buyer who identifies with those attributes is not interested in an alternative fuel vehicle. And it doesn't work much better as a Buick. Yes, the price works better: Give it a slightly nicer interior and exterior, call it the Electra, and the price would fit. But Buick's buyers don't identify with env. conservation, either. The only brand GM had that was a natural fit between this car and the brand's customers was Saturn.

  • dbzimp dbzimp Posts:

    As I've stated in other article comments . I have test driven the Volt it is an exercise in avant garde' technology.I like the ride/drive dynamics of the car very much.Its price point is a little too tall for my wallet though. GM (not the taxed to death citizens) provided all of the R&D funding and the resultant vehicle is most impressive! Now if we can keep the non-automotive press out of the loop(all t.v./cable/satellite news organizations) or at least encourage them to learn and report the truth about this vehicle we would all be the better for it! I am not a damn Liberal and I most certainly am not a tree hugging eco-weenie but I do want to hear the truth about this vehicle and I will not be deviated from my goal in this matter.

  • drpaxis drpaxis Posts:

    Something weird is happening. Edmunds is cited as saying GM and other car sites are saying GB discounted the Volt $10K to move sales, etc. The source is of this reference is Fox News. Oddly, not a single thing that FOX cites checks out. One wonders why or who is behind the fierce desire to completely discredit GB and the Volt. Consumers reports rates 9 out of 10 of the American autos by class as best as coming from GM. That is an amazing shift. And the Volt is clearly a huge technical advance, and will only get better. I own one, and it is great.

Leave a Comment
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Have a question? We're here to help!
Chat*
Chat online with us
Email
Email us at help@edmunds.com
*Available daily 8AM-5PM Pacific
Phone*
Call us at 855-782-4711
SMS*
Text us at ED411