2014 Mazda CX-5 2.5 First Drive

2014 Mazda CX-5 SUV

(2.5L 4-cyl. 6-speed Automatic)
  • 2014 Mazda CX-5 - Action Front 3/4 - 13

    2014 Mazda CX-5 - Action Front 3/4 - 13

    Now that the CX-5 has a power plant worthy of the chassis, it's a far more likable package. | February 05, 2013

30 Photos

30 More Horsepower Makes All the Difference

"We'd love it even more with another 30 horsepower onboard, but the Mazda CX-5 is still a fun drive despite its meager engine power."

That's what we wrote after our 2013 Mazda CX-5 road test with the 2.0-liter Skyactiv four-cylinder engine. For 2014, Mazda has answered the call by giving Touring and Grand Touring versions of the 2014 Mazda CX-5 a new 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine rated at 184 hp. That's exactly 29 more hp than the 2.0-liter engine, which remains standard on the 2014 CX-5 Sport.

Even more important is the new engine's extra 35 pound-feet of torque. We're driving a 2014 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring around trendy Austin, Texas, where rush hour has become a competitive event as everyone makes a dash for their homes in the suburbs. Right away, that additional grunt helps us catch holes in traffic that would have been off limits in last year's CX-5.

CX-5 Gets Muscle From the Mazda 6
The new 2.5-liter four-cylinder also bears the name Skyactiv, since like the 2.0-liter, it's part of Mazda's new family of gasoline engines that use direct injection, high compression and low-friction materials to achieve solid performance and high fuel economy while running on plain old 87 octane fuel.

We already sampled a version of this engine in the 2014 Mazda 6, which is closely related to the CX-5 beneath the skin. Their common platform architecture was originally designed for the sedan, but it's a quirk of U.S. marketing that we got the SUV before we got the car.

In the Mazda 6, the 2.5-liter engine is offered with a six-speed manual or a six-speed automatic transmission, but if you want a manual in your 2014 CX-5, you'll have to drop back to the 2.0-liter Sport model, as the automatic is standard with the 2.5-liter engine. It's too bad, because the manual is startlingly good. However, Mazda officials tell us the take rate for the three-pedal CX-5 is a disappointing 7 percent.

Quick Enough With the Automatic
That's no criticism of the six-speed automatic, though. It's geared the same for both engines, and in our all-wheel-drive CX-5 2.5, it's perceptive and comes up with downshifts quickly when we need to pass.

You still won't be towing horse trailers with the 2014 Mazda CX-5 (indeed, towing capacity is unchanged at 2,000 pounds), but the extra torque is evident and appreciated in the Texas Hill Country.

Our non-certified digital wristwatch suggests a 0-60-mph time in the low 8-second range is within its grasp. That jibes with our seat-of-the-pants impression that the 2014 Mazda CX-5 2.5 is at least a second quicker than the 2013 CX-5 2.0, which ran a 9.7-second 0-60 (or 9.5 seconds with a foot of rollout) during Edmunds testing. For its part, Mazda claims the AWD CX-5 2.5 will run a 7.8-second 0-60, while the lighter front-drive version is reportedly capable of 7.2. If true, the 2014 CX-5 2.5 would be as quick as a 2.0-liter EcoBoost-equipped 2013 Ford Escape, but we won't know for sure until we test one.

Mazda still won't confirm that it's going to offer its even more potent 2.2-liter diesel engine in the U.S.-market CX-5, but we were mightily impressed by the diesel CX-5 prototypes we drove some months back, and that engine is already on sale in European CX-5s. The diesel will be offered in our Mazda 6 later this year.

Fuel Economy Still Class-Leading
Mileage is quite good on the 2014 Mazda CX-5 2.5, likely due in no small part to the 2.5-liter engine's lower torque peak. Its 185 lb-ft come together at just 3,250 rpm compared to a 4,000-rpm threshold for the 2.0-liter engine's 150 lb-ft. The upshot is that the bigger engine doesn't have to work as hard.

Even as our drive takes us down a series of winding roads, our actual mileage stays close to the 24 mpg city EPA rating for the CX-5 2.5 AWD. And we'd expect to come much closer to its 30 mpg highway rating during calm cruising on level highways. The combined rating is 26 mpg.

That's a pretty good number for a 3,500-pound crossover SUV, and indeed, EPA fuel economy ratings for the 2.0-liter and the 2.5-liter are quite close. An AWD automatic-equipped CX-5 with the 2.0-liter is rated 25 city/31 highway/28 combined mpg. In real-world driving conditions, that difference is likely to be a wash.

Meanwhile, the front-wheel-drive CX-5 2.5 is rated 25 city/32 highway/27 combined mpg, while its 2.0-liter equivalent is rated at 26 city/32 highway/29 combined.

For the moment, the Mazda leads the compact crossover class in fuel economy, as you'd have to step down to something smaller like the Buick Encore (28 mpg combined) or 2013 Nissan Juke (29 combined) to beat those numbers. Front-drive versions of the CR-V, Escape (with its 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine) and 2013 Toyota RAV4 are rated 26 mpg combined.

Collision Avoidance System Is New for 2014
Aside from the engine, Mazda is offering a new safety feature, SCBS (Smart City Brake Support) as part of the 2014 CX-5's Technology package. This package costs an additional $1,625 on our CX-5 Grand Touring. You can also get it for $1,485 on the Touring model, but you have to buy it in combination with the $1,130 Bose audio and moonroof package (these items are standard on the Grand Touring).

Basically, SCBS is a low-cost collision mitigation system that helps you avoid rear-ending other vehicles when you're traveling between 3 mph and 19 mph: in other words, when you're stuck in heavy traffic. Using a windshield-mounted laser sensor, SCBS can sense an obstacle and prime the brakes to shorten brake-caliper piston travel and minimize braking time when the driver hits the binders. If the driver doesn't brake, the SCBS brakes independently.

That Technology package also includes a TomTom-based navigation system, HID adaptive headlights, rain-sensing wipers and an auto-dimming mirror. It's a worthwhile upgrade for the headlights alone, though this option group, along with our test vehicle's $100 rear bumper guard, results in a bottom line of $30,695. If you don't care about the Grand Touring's leather upholstery, you could load up a CX-5 Touring model with the same options and land at $29,375.

On the other end of the spectrum, a base, manual-transmission CX-5 Sport starts at $21,990. If you're on a tight budget, that model is still worth considering, one reason being its inventory of standard equipment, ranging from push-button start to 17-inch aluminum alloy wheels with quiet-riding P225/65R17 Yokohama all-season tires. Of course, you can also get these tires on the Touring and then you won't have to go without the extra power.

Still the Athlete of the Small SUV Class
In contrast, the 225/55R19 Toyo tires on our 2014 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring aren't as serene over Texas highways, and the crossover's ordinarily compliant ride occasionally becomes jarring over rough pavement. Still, it's tough to argue with the CX-5's impressive balance on roads with tight curves. It's easily one of the best-handling compact SUVs on the road today.

Inside, the front seats are reasonably comfortable and supportive, and rear seat room is reasonable for two adults, less reasonable for three. The rear cargo area, easily accessed through the large hatch, is a generous 34.1 cubic feet.

Instruments and controls aren't fancy but are intuitive and attractively designed. Bluetooth is standard in Touring and Grand Touring models (optional in Sport), and for 2014, Mazda has added SMS text-to-speech capability for MAP-enabled smartphones.

Horsepower Fixes Everything
There's no denying that the compact sport-ute segment is a tough league to play in, as it's filled with some of the best-selling vehicles in the country, including the CR-V, Escape, RAV4, Kia Sorento and the redesigned Hyundai Santa Fe Sport.

The 2013 Mazda CX-5 was a legitimate player in this class, too, offering a spacious interior, sporty handling and outstanding fuel economy. The trouble was that its 2.0-liter engine, although smooth and willing, felt taxed when accelerating up long grades, especially on the heavier all-wheel-drive model.

Now Mazda has addressed this issue, adding more power without dragging down the compact crossover's class-leading fuel economy. Understandably, company officials predict that the new 2.5-liter engine will be popular, with 70 percent of 2014 CX-5 buyers opting for either the Touring or Grand Touring.

And unless you require a third seat or serious towing capacity, the 2014 Mazda CX-5 2.5 may indeed be all the SUV you'll ever need. With loaded versions priced lower than a top-of-the-line CR-V or Escape, the 2.5-equipped CX-5 is a relative bargain among compact crossovers.

Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

Comments

  • eurobob eurobob Posts:

    Hello... Mazda? Is anyone paying attention? Why do you still cling to the belief that people only buy manual transmissions to save money? Car enthusiasts buy manual transmissions and guess what... they also want the nice goodies like xenon lights, leather, AWD, nice rims, etc, etc. And most of all, they want the more powerful engines! Please, don't drive away your most loyal followers! Buck the trend of putting manuals in only the most basic of trims - you may get a lot more than 7% uptake and it would reinforce the image of a driver's brand. Especially since BMW is quickly vacating it...

  • +1, eurobob! Mazda seems to think that only compact car buyers (Mazda 3 buyers, for example) want the manual and nice goodies! I don't get it. My Protege has the manual and the goodies and I expect the same for my next Mazda......if I get a Mazda.... It

  • openeyes1 openeyes1 Posts:

    While giving the CX-5 a more powerful engine, MPG is taking quite a hit, especially AWD. It would have made more sense in these days of rising fuel prices that Mazda would have released the oil burner first, but then Mazda still hasn't figured out that there's a huge demand for 6 wagons/hatchbacks out there either.

  • sydtron_ sydtron_ Posts:

    The Mazda guys at the Michigan (Grand Rapids) Auto Show flat out stated that the CX-5 is getting the diesel, so I'm taking that as a yes. Mazda is making the manual available on the Touring trim for the new 6, maybe they are looking to do that here also.

  • Eurobob you are so correct about that. Or the fact that they only offer CVT transmissions. bottom line they restrict car lovers from options and only offer certain pre-defined packages.

  • myob myob Posts:

    This would be a pretty fun crossover with a manual and the bigger engine. Unfortunately you have to build a sporting reputation (BMW) to get enough buyers in to try the manual. And if you keep dropping the manuals you won't get that. The problem with really small sporty crossovers is that they're basically raised hatchbacks and you lose much of the utility they provide as they get really small (vs a sedan with folding rear seats) and below a certain size crossover you may be better off with a larger class sedan. Unless you are always carrying large boxes, of course. Even the best handling crossovers are only average compared to a nice handling sedan. I own a crossover with sporting pretensions and would rather have the wagon version which is not available here.

  • tbone85 tbone85 Posts:

    Mazda really can't make noises about being disappointed in the take rate on manuals when they don't offer the option in trim levels that cover 70% of their sales. My old 3 had all the options I wanted and a manual transmission. I also think that getting 29 more horsepower and 35 more lb/ft of torque is a more than fair trade for 1-2 MPG loss estimates. In fact, it's hard to justify the 2.0 with that tradeoff. They should offer the 2.5 as standard, and the diesel as the power and fuel economy upgrade.

  • vladeze100 vladeze100 Posts:

    As an owner of 2014 CX-5 (had it for three weeks), I can say that this is the best small SUV I've driven. I am impressed with the quality Mazda put into this SUV (I also own a Lexus and owned Audi's). I have to say, this SUV is so fun to drive and handles so well. If you are in the market for a small SUV, do yourself a favor and drive this and you will appreciate actual driving.

  • druezer druezer Posts:

    Gotta agree with Eurobob. If I were building my own CX-5 I'd get the more powerful engine, AWD AND the manual transmission. No wonder the take rate for the manual is only 7% if you only offer it in the bare bones version.

  • lark6 lark6 Posts:

    If I'm reading this article correctly, the take rate for the manual was 7% when there was only one engine option available. Was everyone who wanted a manual CX-5 waiting for a different engine to pair with it?

  • I was about to leave a comment about the manual transmission take rate, but Eurobob wrote practically verbatim what I was going to post. Unfortunately it isn't just Mazda that is under this mistaken impression. The handful of models available with a manual transmission from other manufacturers are also typically only available on the entry level model. It is maddening! Manufacturers, if you're only going to offer 1 trim level of a car with a manual, make it with the most powerful engine and a decent number of options at a minimum including Bluetooth, satellite radio, and leather seats.

  • testpilot8 testpilot8 Posts:

    Just bought a 2014 Grand Touring CX-5 with the Technology package. Its roomy and comfortable and everything is well integrated. The handling is great for this type or vehicle. Power is more than adequate...I rejected buying a CX-5 with the 2L motor earlier for lack of power reasons. The mileage can actually be better than EPA...I got 35 mpg on a longer run that was 95% freeway at speeds of 60-65mph. Road noise is moderate...this is not as quiet as my Nissan Frontier (I was surprised) but quite reasonable.

  • nikoman nikoman Posts:

    Just bought a loaded CX-5 2.5 and I have to admit something. Having come from 4 Audis in a row the fit, finish and overall drive-ability is premium considering the price. Best 30k I've spent on a new vehicle...

  • luvmazda1 luvmazda1 Posts:

    I agree with eurobob. There are so many reasons I purchase manual and fuel economy is not the main one. I prefer to be able to work around poor weather drivers and have more control over the timing of gear shift doing so. If there were tan interiors other options available to me even in the smaller cars I would have been exceptionally happy. I did settle on the CX5, but with the boring choices available to me it did feel like settling when what I want is a manual with the touring options.

  • Can't wait for the 2.2 diesel! Read reviews from Australia looks great, but I guess the sedan version(Mazda 6) is going to get it 1st here. It is tough to hold off as really like the 2.5 2014 Touring AWD, daughter has one and she loves it also getting 29 mpg.

Leave a Comment

Research Models

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Edmunds Insurance Estimator

The Edmunds TCO® estimated monthly insurance payment for a 2014 Mazda CX-5 in VA is:

$159 per month*
* Explanation
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Have a question? We're here to help!
Chat*
Chat online with us
Email
Email us at help@edmunds.com
*Available daily 8AM-5PM Pacific
Phone*
Call us at 855-782-4711
SMS*
Text us at ED411