You'd have to possess much deeper pockets or smaller suitcases to find another coupe with the straightline performance of the 556-hp CTS-V coupe. Not long ago, 12-second quarter-mile times were only available in the supercar realm.
Though lacking the feel and feedback of a sports car, the CTS-V coupe provides commensurate grip and agility. Multi-level driver-adjustable stability/traction controls thankfully can be turned completely off for full Hooligan mode.
Standard two-mode self-adjusting magnetorheological dampers offer a nearly unparalleled ability to smooth out little bumps and the car's long-ish wheelbase takes care of the big ones.
Standard high-performance low-profile tires are slightly louder than typical tires, but are still tolerable. Wind noise is commendably low.
Sound overall ergonomics with only a couple 'Why'd they do that?' miscues. Combination of hard buttons plus touchscreen offers a wide variety of input options/flexibility on the center stack with standard hard drive-based infotainment system.
Prominent rear/side blind spots from large sail panel and distorted image from rearview mirror through steeply raked, rear window. Luckily, back-up camera is standard, but could benefit from blind-spot monitor (unavailable).
Seat Access & Space
Better-than-most front-seat comfort/support may be further upgraded with Recaro option (for a price). There's nothing that can be done to improve deplorable rear-seat access or comfort; both of which are far below average -- even for a coupe.
Cargo & Storage
Very little in-cabin small storage compounded by a small-volume trunk with a small aperture, high lift-over height, and luggage-crushing goose-neck hinges.
Since the intro of the 2008 CTS, GM has already proven that Cadillac knows how to design/build a luxury car. There are yet details that need to be addressed before the CTS can be put in the same league as similarly priced German cars.
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.