1999 Toyota 4Runner Consumer Review: Decent, but Overrated SUV

1999 Toyota 4Runner SUV - Consumer Review

Average Consumer Rating

115 Total Reviews

All Models

Build Quality
Reliability Value
Decent, but Overrated SUV
By workinonjunk on


1999 Toyota 4Runner SR5 4dr SUV 4WD


I have 79K mi. on my 4Runner and it's
been somewhat reliable, but not what I
was expecting from a Japanese vehicle.
The MAF sensor had to be replaced at
65K and I've had to replace the front
brake rotors several times due to
warping. The seats are horrible on long
road trips as there's no thigh support
at all. The rear suspension is too soft
and it wallows and pitche with even
one person in the back seat. Replacing
the springs/shocks with an aftermarket
set VASTLY improved the handling/ride.
Acceleration is OK but highway passing
could be better. The ground clearance
and 31" tires are great. Fuel economy
is OK for an SUV-21mpg highway.

Best Features

Exterior styling, ground clearance, fit & finish, cargo room, resale value

Worst Features

Better seats!! Stiffer rear suspension. Redesign front brake rotors. Needs a larger engine. Selectable,lockable 4WD should be available with a manual transmission. Frame-mounted body protection instead of the fragile body- mounted running boards.
Recommend (0) (0)

Are you the author of this review?

Update Your Review
Report it
Comments (0) Post a Comment
Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post a comment.


Select a different vehicle  
Recently Viewed
There are no recently viewed vehicles to display

Write Consumer Reviews

Write Consumer Reviews

Write a review and rate your own car.