2004 Mazda 6 Consumer Review: Good, but not that good

2004 Mazda 6 - Consumer Review

Average Consumer Rating

459 Total Reviews

s Sedan (3.0L V6 5-speed Manual)

Build Quality
Reliability Value
Good, but not that good
By Jeremy on


2004 Mazda 6 s 4dr Sports Sedan (3.0L 6cyl 5M)


I purchased my Mazda in Jan of 2005 new. I was a great price and I could not resist it. However, the had problems within the first year of owning the it. I had to replace the tires after 20K of driving. In year 2 I had to replace the breaks. I also noticed that I was getting less than 300 miles to the tank, which was pretty sad considering I drive mostly highway at 70-75 mph. Now, I am by no means an aggressive driver these types of issues should not happen in such a short amount of time. In year 3 my battery died,but what got me was that I had to replace the shock. I traded this one in for a Honda, but I think I got a lemon on this one.

Best Features

It is a peppy car. Great for passing if needed. Sport look and handles great!

Worst Features

Brighter headlights, better shocks, and tires that don't go bald after 15-20K (after market purchase would fix this).
Recommend (0) (1)

Are you the author of this review?

Update Your Review
Report it
Comments (0) Post a Comment
Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post a comment.


Select a different vehicle  
Recently Viewed
There are no recently viewed vehicles to display

Write Consumer Reviews

Write Consumer Reviews

Write a review and rate your own car.