2002 Volvo V40 Consumer Review: End of Lease Review

2002 Volvo V40 - Consumer Review

Average Consumer Rating

25 Total Reviews

Base Wagon (1.9L 4-cyl. Turbo 5-speed Automatic)

Select a different vehicle  
Recently Viewed
There are no recently viewed vehicles to display
Build Quality
Reliability Value
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
End of Lease Review
By Graham on


2002 Volvo V40 4dr Wagon (1.9L 4cyl Turbo 5A)


There were 3 areas of disappointment I had with this vehicle: 1)excessive brake pad wear, 2)poor quality original tires, and 3)expensive maintenance costs. The interior quality was good, almost excellent. When the car was new, it felt like a struggle to get it up to 65-75 mph, but now that it has over 50k miles, it flies! So the power and acceleration improve with age! Too bad I am returning it.Volvo has got to do something to compensate owners for the poor brake pad wear, they won't admit that there is a problem.The OEM Continental tires would not stay inflated properly.Also had 2 flats.Upgrade to Michelins required tires rated to 150 mph! Expensive. Why Volvo?!

Best Features

Safety. Reliable engine. Power gets better with mileage. Conservative and functional interior and dash. the black metallic paint and beige interior look good and still do after 50,000 miles.

Worst Features

Be realistic. This vehicle requires maintenance every 5,000 miles - similar to Lexus and Acura. It is easier to replace brake pads at this interval than at 7,500 mile intervals. I replaced 3 pairs of brake rotors because of this.
Recommend (1) (0)
Report it
Comments (0) Post a Comment
Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post a comment.


Nearby Inventory Zip Code UPDATE