2004 Ford Ranger 4dr SuperCab Tremor 4WD Styleside SB Shown

2004 Ford Ranger Reliability

Style:
XLT Appearance 4dr SuperCab Styleside SB | Show All Styles

TMV Pricing:
Appraise Your Car

Photos Videos

5.3

Editors' Rating | Read the Model Review

8.6

Consumer Rating

102 Reviews |Write a Review

   

True Market Value

True Market Value

Find Out What Others Are Paying
For The Car You Want
With Edmunds TMV® you get a customized price estimate based on your Zip Code, your car, and your desired options.

Buying & Selling

Vehicle Details

Multimedia

Ratings & Reviews

Payment Calculators

Helpful Tools
• Search Used Ford Listings •
• Sell Your Car Online • Get a Bad Credit Car Loan

J.D. Power PowerCircle Ratings
Go to Ratings Index | About J.D. Power Ratings
View More Ratings at the J.D. Power Consumer Center

2008

Initial Quality Ratings- Mechanical definition
Overall Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Mechanical 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Mechanical 5 Blobs 5 / 5
Initial Quality Ratings - Design definition
Overall Quality - Design 5 Blobs 5 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Design 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Design 5 Blobs 5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Design 5 Blobs 5 / 5
Performance and Design Ratings definition
Overall Performance and Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Performance 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Comfort 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Instrument Panel 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Style 2 Blobs 2 / 5

2007

Initial Quality Ratings- Mechanical definition
Overall Quality - Mechanical 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Mechanical 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Initial Quality Ratings - Design definition
Overall Quality - Design 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Design 5 Blobs 5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Design 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Performance and Design Ratings definition
Overall Performance and Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Performance 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Comfort 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Instrument Panel 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Style 2 Blobs 2 / 5

2006

Initial Quality Ratings- Mechanical definition
Overall Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Mechanical 4.5 Blobs 4.5 / 5
Initial Quality Ratings - Design definition
Overall Quality - Design 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Design 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Design 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Design 4.5 Blobs 4.5 / 5
Performance and Design Ratings definition
Overall Performance and Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Performance 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Comfort 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Instrument Panel 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Style 2 Blobs 2 / 5

2005

Initial Quality Ratings- Mechanical definition
Overall Quality - Mechanical 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Mechanical 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Mechanical 4.5 Blobs 4.5 / 5
Initial Quality Ratings - Design definition
Overall Quality - Design 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Design 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Design 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Design 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Performance and Design Ratings definition
Overall Performance and Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Performance 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Comfort 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Instrument Panel 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Style 2 Blobs 2 / 5

2004

Initial Quality Ratings- Mechanical definition
Overall Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Mechanical 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Mechanical 4.5 Blobs 4.5 / 5
Initial Quality Ratings - Design definition
Overall Quality - Design 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Design 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Design 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Design 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Performance and Design Ratings definition
Overall Performance and Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Performance 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Comfort 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Instrument Panel 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Style 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Long Term Dependability Ratings (4-5 years) definition
Overall Dependability 4.5 Blobs 4.5 / 5
Powertrain Dependability 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Body & Interior Dependability 4.5 Blobs 4.5 / 5
Feature & Accessory Dependability 5 Blobs 5 / 5

2003

Initial Quality Ratings- Mechanical definition
Overall Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Mechanical 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Initial Quality Ratings - Design definition
Overall Quality - Design 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Design 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Design 5 Blobs 5 / 5
Performance and Design Ratings definition
Overall Performance and Design 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Performance 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Comfort 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Instrument Panel 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Style 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Long Term Dependability Ratings (4-5 years) definition
Overall Dependability 4 Blobs 4 / 5
Powertrain Dependability 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Body & Interior Dependability 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Feature & Accessory Dependability 4.5 Blobs 4.5 / 5

2002

Initial Quality Ratings- Mechanical definition
Overall Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Mechanical 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Mechanical 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Initial Quality Ratings - Design definition
Overall Quality - Design 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Powertrain Quality - Design 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Body & Interior Quality - Design 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Features and Accessories Quality - Design 5 Blobs 5 / 5
Performance and Design Ratings definition
Overall Performance and Design 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Performance 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Comfort 2 Blobs 2 / 5
Features and Instrument Panel 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Style 2.5 Blobs 2.5 / 5
Long Term Dependability Ratings (4-5 years) definition
Overall Dependability 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5
Powertrain Dependability 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Body & Interior Dependability 3 Blobs 3 / 5
Feature & Accessory Dependability 3.5 Blobs 3.5 / 5

J.D. Powers Ratings Legend

5 Blobs Among the best
4 Blobs Better than most
3 Blobs Does not really stand out
2 Blobs The rest

Initial Quality Ratings - Mechanical

Overall Quality - Mechanical
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS), which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems that have caused a complete breakdown or malfunction of any component, feature, or item (i.e., components that stop working or trim pieces that break or come loose).

Powertrain Quality - Mechanical
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS),which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems with the engine or transmission as well as problems that affect the driving experience (i.e., vehicle/brakes pull, abnormal noises or vibrations) only.

Body & Interior Quality - Mechanical
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS),which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems with wind noise, water leaks, poor interior fit/finish, paint imperfection, and squeaks/rattles.

Feature & Accessories Quality - Mechanical
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS),which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems with the seats, windshield wipers, navigation system, rear-seat entertainment system, heater, air conditioner, stereo system, sunroof and trip computer.

Initial Quality Ratings - Design

Overall Quality - Design
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS),which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems where controls or features may work as designed, but are difficult to use or understand (i.e., overly complicated controls/features that are difficult to operate due to poor location).

Powertrain Quality - Design
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS),which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems with the engine or transmission as well as problems that affect the driving experience (i.e., ride smoothness, responsiveness of the steering system and brakes, and handling/stability).

Body & Interior Quality - Design
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS),which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems with the front-/rear-end styling, the appearance of the interior and exterior, and the sound of the doors when closing.

Feature & Accessories Quality - Design
Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS),which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems with the seats, stereo/navigation system, heater, air conditioner, and sunroof.