I tried to like it, but at the end trade it in for Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring only after 1 year.
By convert777 on
2011 Toyota Highlander Limited 4dr SUV AWD (3.5L 6cyl 5A)
Positive: Suppose to have stellar reliability and has a good resale, quick, relatively roomy and comfortable if you are not a driver.
Negatives: Most surfaces and materials don't belong in $40,000 car (ok with me) , drives like minivan/truck crossover with very light and not communicative steering (does not drives, but floats), 3 rd row not usable - not just because of size/just plywood covered in cheap vinyl, no blind spot monitoring ( a must because of size, blind spots), no adaptive xenon headlights, average MPG
for it size ( computer always overstate by 1 MPG). Toyota keeps being arrogant and substantially raised prices for 2012 without any improvements, that worked in my favor.
My last 5 cars were Toyota's. After buying my first Mazda and then a Subaru I discovered that they are build as good or better than Toyota and pleasure to drive.
Checked with Consumer reports and others and discovered that it is not only my opinion:
Subaru and Mazda are higher rated that Toyota.
Replaced 2011 Highlander Limited with 2012 CX-9 GT for only $2000 extra (no financing):
pleasure to drive and handing like compact CUV/sedan (yet substantially bigger than Highlander), very usable 3rd row, near luxury interior/exterior, all the extras and safety futures not even available in Highlander, reliability should be terrific also - six year of
the model and built in Japan.
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.