2009 Saab 9-5 Consumer Discussions

Saab 9-5 Wagon

Re: 2007 9-5 2.3T One year report [sidv]

Written by: sidv on Mar 12, 2009 07:43 PM

Wow, nothing like talking to yourself in a forum. I just wanted to say that in the sixteen and a half months (and a mere 10 posts overall in this forum) that I posted my one year review that my 9-5 has been absolutely flawless save for a very occasional rattle near the sunroof. The short term lease is about up and I will miss it quite a bit, it's been a really good car that ... Read More...

Saab 9-5 Sedan

Re: 2003 saab 95 aero AT [saablcp]

Written by: saabgirl on Apr 26, 2008 08:42 PM

Just speculating here on Saab CPOs which go for six years or 100K from date of service. I think it's correct to say that right now Saab will only CPO cars that are 2004 or newer. But suppose that an '03 Saab had been turned in at the end of its lease, been CPOed (good for 6 years or 100K) and resold. Then suppose the second owner in 2008 trades it in for another brand. If mileage ... Read More...

The cheapening of the 9-5

quote from the saab 2008 site

Written by: smu1976 on Dec 18, 2007 09:22 PM

Saab USA is working to strengthen our acclaimed European Delivery Program. This delivery option, which will incorporate new components, will be available for 2009 Saab vehicles. So why have five tabs on your site for euro delivery? If it's so acclaimed, why drop it for a year? Read More...

Yes, thats a Malibu or Impala dash controls in your Saab

Written by: smu1976 on Dec 18, 2007 09:18 PM

1986 900 SPG 1992 9000 Griffen 1999 Saab 9-5 V6 (no need, 4 is just as good) 2002 Saab 9-5 Aero Wagon Thought I was sort of loyal to Saab, but the hell with them. Wanted to book a trip for Euro delivery, website says check back for 2009 models. Email, get a nasty response that GM's board says that this issue will not be answered again in an email (mind you, I am trying to buy ... Read More...

2.3 4 vs. 3.0 V-6

Written by: pearson244 on Dec 03, 2007 09:25 AM

I am on my 3rd 9.5. First two (2000 and 2002) we're V-6 powered, my 2007 is, of course a 2.3 260 HP turbo, Aero in this case. I used to be annoyed when folks picked on the V-6, I loved the power and smoothness of that engine, although that asymetrical turbo seemed to cause a weird "elastic" throttle response. Anyway, between the two V-6's, I put on combined 50,000 + miles ... Read More...