|
Road Tests: Full Test
Full Test: 2001 Honda Civic
Specifications and Performance - Coupe
By Erin Mahoney
Date Posted 04-25-2001
Specifications and Performance
|
2001
Honda Civic EX Coupe
Specifications:
| Model
Year: |
2001 |
| Make: |
Honda |
| Model: |
Civic |
| Style: |
EX Coupe
|
| Base
Price: |
$17,100
|
| Price
as Tested: |
$17,100
|
| Drive
Type: |
Front-wheel
drive |
| Transmission
Type: |
5-speed
manual |
| Displacement
(liters): |
1.7 |
| Engine
Type: |
I4 |
| Valve
Train: |
4 valves
per cylinder |
| Horsepower
(hp @ rpm): |
127 @ 6300 |
| Torque
(lb-feet @ rpm): |
114 @ 4800 |
| Redline
(rpm): |
6,750 (tachometer
indicated) |
| Curb
Weight (lbs): |
2,553 |
| Sticker
EPA (mpg): |
32 City
37 Highway |
| Edmunds
Observed (mpg): |
31 |
Test
Conditions:
| Temp
(deg Fahrenheit): |
72
|
| Humidity: |
32% |
| Elevation
(ft): |
85
|
| Barometer
(bars): |
N/A |
| Wind: |
3mph
|
| 0
- 60 Acceleration (sec): |
7.9
|
| 1/4
Mile (sec @ mph): |
16.2@86.2
|
| 60
- 0 Braking (ft): |
124
|
| 200
ft. Skidpad (g's): |
No
Data |
| 600
ft. Slalom (mph): |
61.1 |
Acceleration
Comments:
| With
any Honda VTEC engine you don't really get the power bulge until
higher up in the rev range and this engine with its 6,750 redline
was no exception. The best run was done with all shifting done
at or after redline, but before the 7,000 rev limiter cut in.
Honda is known for getting good power from its small, efficient,
and clean-burning engines, and this engine delivers it all.
An engine that allows the car to go 16s in the quarter mile,
that gets 37 miles to the gallon on the freeway and is also
ULEV-rated, what more could you ask for? |
Braking
Comments:
| Excellent
stopping distances that are more in line with a sport sedan
than an economy car. Moderate ABS system noise was noted, but
the Civic EX exhibited good stability, short stopping distances
and little nose dive. |
Skidpad
Comments:
| Skidpad
not available at time of testing. |
Slalom
Comments:
| For
a car with such a short wheelbase and so little weight to shift
around, I had expected slightly better numbers, but I won't
dissect that whole issue of double A-arm front suspension versus
MacPherson struts. Handling was as predictable as Honda's reputation
for reliability; in other words, no surprises. It pushed out
at the limits, which were understandable, not extremely high,
nor really low. Like most of the Honda line, it doesn't invoke
any real driving passion, but it does work well. Neil
G. Chirico |
|
| |
|
|