|
Road Tests: Long-Term Test
2000 Lincoln LS
May 2001
By editors at Edmunds.com
Date Posted 01-01-1999
When Detroit Editor John Clor had to turn over the keys to our long-term Lincoln
LS after its three-month stint in Michigan was up, a melancholy mood came over
him. A real enthusiast, you see, never likes to surrender seat time in a car that
is as rewarding to drive as the LS V8. The Lincoln's well-planted handling, crisp
steering and brisk acceleration make getting behind the wheel invigorating for
the soul. Clor knew he would miss the Lincoln's playful personality and driver's-car
demeanor.
When an owner develops this kind of emotional attachment to a car, it often helps
them overlook some of the shortcomings inherent to that particular vehicle. Marketers
and researchers will tell you that when a person is well-satisfied with a car's
driving experience, things like quality, reliability and service history become
less important to them -- which is likely the explanation for the love of old
British sports cars. It is also the likely explanation for Clor's overall impression
of lasting fondness for the Lincoln LS.
A review of our long-term reports on the LS reveals an array of ownership concerns,
ranging from the continual shift-quality problems with the Lincoln's five-speed
automatic transmission, to less-worrisome things like less-than-functional cupholders,
or the fact that the CD changer makes the glove box unusable. While both of the
latter items have been addressed with design changes to the 2001 LS, other small
things have cropped up this past month that fall into the "wish they'd rethink
this" category.
For one, the rubber door seal running along the top edge of the rocker panel has
come loose under the driver's door, a victim of normal ingress/egress wear along
the door sill. While unsightly, our main issue with it is that replacing the seal
won't alleviate the chance of the problem happening again. And two, Clor has inadvertently
activated the Lincoln's RESCU system service because of the placement of the "SOS"
button, mounted closer to the sunroof opening than the roof's own power switch
(located in between the map-light switches just aft of the rearview mirror). Embarrassingly,
Clor has twice initiated a call to the RESCU operator, both by fumbling overhead
for the map lights in the dark, and again by reaching up in the daytime to open
the sunroof. We wonder just how many "false" calls the operators are getting because
of this less-than-optimal switch placement.
Oh, sure, there are other little things, too. The CD changer, for instance, has
developed a rattle that can only be subdued by strategically placing a few McDonald's
napkins on the opened glove box door and then closing it slowly so that they'll
press up against the changer enough to quiet it. And lately Clor's been hearing
a high-pitched whistle upon hard acceleration that sounds almost like the whine
from a small turbocharger -- which would be fine if only the Lincoln had
a turbocharger. Though both could be classified as minor NVH (noise, vibration
and harshness) issues, neither is acceptable for a $40,000 performance sedan built
to rival BMW.
What does rival BMW is the Lincoln's serious delivery of quick-revving
power and its downright satisfying handling -- its less-than-optimal-shifting
automatic transmission notwithstanding. And while our LS doesn't turn as many
heads in Detroit as a BMW 5 Series would, that's mainly because we see far more
of these Lincolns driving around the Motor City than 5 Series Bimmers -- something
that can't be said in import-laden Los Angeles. If the real yardstick of a great
car is truly in the driving, then the Lincoln must rank high up on our list, even
if it is less than perfect.
Some might say that the burden of niggling design imperfections and a few extra
trips to the dealership service department is a small price to pay for a highly
rewarding driving experience. A larger price to pay is the use of premium fuel
-- especially during the latest round of oil-company price-gouging that has sent
the top grades of gas to the $2 to $3 per gallon range. So Clor had experimented
by alternating between using "plus" and "premium" grade fuel in the LS to determine
if there is noticeable performance or mileage degradation between the 87 and 89
octane gas. He found that while there was no discernable loss of power or performance
using midgrade fuel every other tankful, there was often a mileage penalty of
up to 1 mpg per tank or more on the cheaper gas. But putting in 91-octane premium
proved no better than the 89 hi-test.
What affected Clor's mileage most was his right foot. Spirited, point-and-shoot
throttling around town can result in SUV-like 12 to 13 mpg numbers, while a steady
highway cruise can easily net 23 to 24 mpg. Our overall average since taking delivery
of the Lincoln is slightly above 17 mpg. We realize that owners shopping for hot
sedans in the $40K range don't usually worry much about gas mileage. They're likely
more keyed on the fun-to-drive factor, with a little bit of status and image added
in for good measure. For Clor, driving the Lincoln LS rarely failed to bring a
smile, and driving it hard could even be gleeful. And despite its inherent shortfalls,
the fact that it's not a BMW made it all the more satisfying.
Current Odometer: 28,330
Best Fuel Economy: 23.2 mpg
Worst Fuel Economy: 12.4 mpg
Average Fuel Economy (over the life of the vehicle): 17.1 mpg
Body Repair Costs: None
Maintenance Costs: None
Problems: Driver-side rubber door seal on rocker panel separated from clips;
driveline whistle during hard acceleration; rattle from glove box-mounted CD changer.
|