
|
|
Comparison Tests
2000 Economy Sedan Comparison Test
Specifications and Performance - 2000 Honda Civic LX
By Karl Brauer
Date Posted 12-21-2000
Specifications and Performance
|
2000 Honda Civic LX
Specifications:
| Model
Year: |
2000 |
| Make: |
Honda
|
| Model: |
Civic
|
| Style: |
LX
|
| Base
Price: |
$15,245
|
| Price
as Tested: |
$16,145
|
| Drive
Type: |
FWD
|
| Transmission
Type: |
4A
|
| Displacement
(liters): |
1.6
|
| Engine
Type: |
I4
|
| Valve
Train: |
SOHC
4 valves per cylinder |
| Horsepower
(hp @ rpm): |
106
@ 6200 |
| Torque (lb-feet @ rpm): |
103
@ 4600 |
| Redline (rpm): |
N/A
|
| Curb
Weight (lbs): |
2,456
|
| Sticker
EPA (mpg): |
28
City 35 Highway |
| Edmunds.com's Observed Fuel Economy (mpg): |
26.7
|
Test
Conditions:
| Temp
(deg Fahrenheit): |
63
|
| Humidity: |
60%
|
| Elevation
(ft): |
85 |
| Barometer
(bars): |
29.96 |
| Wind:
|
SW
@ 11 MPH |
| 0
- 60 Acceleration (sec): |
10.3
|
| 1/4
Mile (sec @ mph): |
17.8
@ 77.4 |
| 60
- 0 Braking (ft): |
155
|
| 200
ft. Skidpad (g's): |
0.77
|
| 600
ft. Slalom (mph): |
57.5
|
Acceleration
Comments:
| Similar
to Neon, with a 2700 rpm brake torque. However,
this is met by ZERO wheelspin. Shifts occur 300
RPM below redline. Transmission does not allow for
the manual engagement of first gear. To utilize
first gear you must be in "D". Placing the lever
in second gear and stomping on the gas will not
result in the tranny kicking down to first. |
Braking
Comments:
| No
ABS, yet brakes feel decent. Threshold is not as
touchy as the Neon. Brakes do not feel powerful,
but do feel confidence inspiring. Very straight
and linear with little squeal or lockup. Brakes
don't have near the power as the Dodge. |
Skidpad
Comments:
| Obscene
amount of body roll. Tons of tire squeal. Both driver's
side tires were completely unloaded. Too much play
in the steering. Lots of correction was needed to
keep on course. Not enough lateral support in the
seats. Felt extremely slow. |
Slalom
Comments:
| SUPER
slow steering. SLOPPY. Massive amounts of input
required with little feedback. Wheel is far too
thin. Rack ratio is terrible. Despite all this,
the car was still predictable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|