NAVIGATION
Introduction
Ninth Place
Eighth Place
Seventh Place
Sixth Place
Fifth Place
Fourth Place
Third Place
Second Place
First Place
Conclusion
Editor Picks
Evaluation - Drive
Evaluation - Ride
Evaluation - Design
Evaluation - Cargo/Passenger Space
Evaluation - Miscellaneous
Performance
Interior & Exterior
Engine & Transmission
A Twelve-Step System to Economy Car Bliss
Final Tally

USEFUL TOOLS
E-mail this Page to a Friend


Comparison Tests

2000 Economy Sedan Comparison Test
Specifications and Performance - 2000 Honda Civic LX
By Karl Brauer
Date Posted 12-21-2000

Specifications and Performance

2000 Honda Civic LX

Specifications:

Model Year: 2000
Make: Honda
Model: Civic
Style: LX
Base Price: $15,245
Price as Tested: $16,145
Drive Type: FWD
Transmission Type: 4A
Displacement (liters): 1.6
Engine Type: I4
Valve Train: SOHC 4 valves per cylinder
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 106 @ 6200
Torque (lb-feet @ rpm): 103 @ 4600
Redline (rpm): N/A
Curb Weight (lbs): 2,456
Sticker EPA (mpg): 28 City 35 Highway
Edmunds.com's Observed Fuel Economy (mpg): 26.7

Test Conditions:

Temp (deg Fahrenheit): 63
Humidity: 60%
Elevation (ft): 85
Barometer (bars): 29.96
Wind: SW @ 11 MPH

Track Performance:

0 - 60 Acceleration (sec): 10.3
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 17.8 @ 77.4
60 - 0 Braking (ft): 155
200 ft. Skidpad (g's): 0.77
600 ft. Slalom (mph): 57.5

Acceleration Comments:
Similar to Neon, with a 2700 rpm brake torque. However, this is met by ZERO wheelspin. Shifts occur 300 RPM below redline. Transmission does not allow for the manual engagement of first gear. To utilize first gear you must be in "D". Placing the lever in second gear and stomping on the gas will not result in the tranny kicking down to first.

Braking Comments:
No ABS, yet brakes feel decent. Threshold is not as touchy as the Neon. Brakes do not feel powerful, but do feel confidence inspiring. Very straight and linear with little squeal or lockup. Brakes don't have near the power as the Dodge.

Skidpad Comments:
Obscene amount of body roll. Tons of tire squeal. Both driver's side tires were completely unloaded. Too much play in the steering. Lots of correction was needed to keep on course. Not enough lateral support in the seats. Felt extremely slow.

Slalom Comments:
SUPER slow steering. SLOPPY. Massive amounts of input required with little feedback. Wheel is far too thin. Rack ratio is terrible. Despite all this, the car was still predictable.