Ah yes, the Dodge (and, for a few more months, the Plymouth) Neon. This was
the cute little car that put Chrysler on the economy sedan map when it replaced
the Shadow/Sundance twins back in 1994 as a '95 model. From its friendly looks
to its nimble handling, the Neon was an excellent combination of fun and function.
The optional 150-horsepower, 2.0-liter DOHC engine (standard on early Sport
and later R/T models) gave the Neon a distinct performance advantage over competitors
from Ford, Honda, and Toyota, while racking up a long list of SCCA championship
titles at the hands of professional and amateur racers.
This year the Neon went through its first major redesign. Dodge likes to refer
to the 2000 model as the fun economy car that's grown up without growing old.
After running the new Neon head-to-head against its competitors, we call it
the car that's gained very little while losing a lot. In fact, the "top-of-the-line"
ES model we drove had no ABS, CD player, cruise control, rear disc brakes, seat
height adjustment or side airbags (those last two items aren't available on
the new Neon-even as options).
Our Neon was missing another crucial element in today's competitive economy
sedan market: a fourth gear for its automatic transmission. No other vehicle
in this test, not even the Hyundai or Daewoo, could make that claim to shame.
Like we said earlier, the key to a successful economy sedan is making it not
seem like an economy sedan. Here the Neon failed miserably. When climbing hills
the car would upshift to third, then lose speed because of a lack of torque,
then abruptly drop into second and howl as it accelerated up to cruising speed
again, then shift back into third and start the process over again...all without
changing the throttle position! A three-speed automatic in a 2000 model-year
vehicle, especially a vehicle that is completely redesigned for 2000, screams
cost cutting on a level we haven't seen since our last viewing of The Towering
Inferno.
Further cost-cutting measures were apparent whenever the Neon traveled above
50 mph. Wind and road noise was among the highest we observed during the comparison
test and engine noise from the 132-horsepower 2.0-liter surpassed what we would
describe as intrusive, bordering on obnoxious. We're certain the Neon's lack
of a fourth-gear overdrive contributed to its excessive engine roar at highway
speeds, further proof that this transmission is out of place in the 21st century.
The engine itself seemed capable enough, but we'd likely prefer the 150-horsepower
version (available in the new R/T model) mated to a five-speed manual.
Even with its fatal flaws the Neon still managed to score points with our editors
in certain areas. For instance, steering and suspension ratings were universally
high, confirming that some of the original Neon's charm has survived in the
current version. During low-speed canyon runs the Dodge remained composed and
confident until pushed hard, when body roll and tire squeal became an issue.
As one tester noted, "Strikes a good balance between comfort and performance."
The car's braking performance was adequate, but pedal feel and feedback was
limited and, of course, there was no ABS (though it's available as a $600 option
and includes rear wheel disc brakes and traction control).
Exterior and interior design was praised for its attractive and functional
appearance, though some staffers commented that the thick C-pillars and high
rear deck reduced outward visibility. The all-black interior appealed to editors
who thought it looked clean and upscale, but others wished for a contrasting
color to break up the monotony. Clear, easy-to-read white-faced gauges and user-friendly
HVAC controls kept most drivers happy, but the short front seat bottoms had
everyone wishing for more leg support. Audio controls were standard-issue Chrysler,
meaning too many small, identical buttons that require too much attention to
operate while driving, and nobody liked the "cheesy" carbon-fiber-wannabe dash
inserts. We'd prefer to see this money spent elsewhere (like on a four-speed
automatic). We were impressed by the three large cupholders located in the center
console, but why does the steering wheel look like it's upside down when it
isn't?
The Neon still has some bragging rights, including a roomy interior, a sleek
exterior design and above average build quality. Our test unit exhibited no
rattles or squeaks and had impressively tight tolerances between the exterior
panels. If this car were cheaper than all of the others on this test, an argument
could be made for the Neon as the choice for cash-strapped buyers. But the Daewoo
and Hyundai are less expensive and the Nissan is only $400 more. All of these
cars were better equipped than the Dodge and finished much further up the ladder
in our final standings.
The only consolation we can give Dodge is to tell them that the Neon can easily
be fixed. Up the content level, give us a four-speed automatic, and reduce the
cabin noise at highway speeds. Do this while keeping the costs in check and
the Neon would be a truly competitive entry in this class.
Editor Comments
The Neon is more mature now. It's bigger, more refined. I have full confidence
saying it is now a better economy sedan. But I say that as a backhanded compliment.
Crank windows in back? No map lights? Come on. I preferred the unpretentious
nature of the previous Neon. I also miss the old Neon R/T and the DOHC 150-horsepower
engine. -- Brent Romans
The strange duck of the test. Three-speed automatic transmission and power
windows for front occupants only? Dodge. Different indeed! The recent facelift
helped, but the interior is dated and the vehicle really needs a four-speed
automatic to be competitive. The steering in this vehicle was phenomenal. This
was the only vehicle that really communicated what was happening underfoot,
without jolting the cabin to death. In the canyons the Neon is light, nimble
and easy to throw around, yet on the highway the cabin noise is a bit harsh
for the average consumer. -- Scott Mead
Rather Disney in its appeal - you know people will buy the Neon because of
its big, deep buggy eyes and its loud (as Hell), unrefined engine. Perhaps refinement
is irrelevant anyhow, since the Neon drives as though it aspires to be one of
the large cars in the Dodge fleet (the Intrepid is also very loud). The Neon
has wonderfully weighted steering feel and it's quite responsive to steering
input. But take the Neon on the freeway and watch it attempt to hide its transmission's
lethargy at middle speeds through a front of excessive engine, road and wind
noise. -- Erin Riches
Neon is stylishly handsome, and has an upscale, "big car" interior design.
It's comfortable for front seat passengers, and exhibits good build quality.
The stereo will satisfy all but the most discerning owners. However, Chrysler
opted to cut costs where people will find the evidence. Our ES model had no
cruise control and no alloy wheels, but it did have rear magazine pockets. An
auto-down driver's window is nonexistent, but there's a useless headliner grab
handle for the driver. Plus, two of the door seals leaked water in a gas station
car wash. Add the senseless choices regarding content to the fact that our Neon
was saddled with a three-speed automatic, and you wonder if the person in charge
of development dollars still has a job. The final nails in Neon's coffin are
labeled noise, vibration, and harshness. Had we tested the manual transmission
model, I might have liked the car more. As it stands, I'll pass, and recommend
others do the same. -- Christian Wardlaw
Specifications and Performance - 2000 Dodge Neon ES
Stereo Evaluation - 2000 Dodge Neon ES
Rear Seat/Cargo Area Evaluation - 2000 Dodge Neon ES