Locate an Auto Repair Shop in Savery, Wyoming

Now that you've bought that beautiful new car, how do you plan to take care of it? When the need for vehicle maintenance or accident repair arises, Edmunds.com features a national directory of auto repair shops to help you locate a trustworthy mechanic in your area. Search our listings of auto repair shops in Savery, Wyoming and compare prices and services to find the best deal at the most convenient location. With all the time and effort that went into buying your new car, it's important to find an auto repair shop you can trust.

Add your business

River Street Motors Incorporated

201 E Bridge
Saratoga, WY 82331
(307) 326-5605

Write the first Review
Rocky Mountain Auto & Muffler

1694 Yampa Ave
Craig, CO 81625
(970) 824-5749

Write the first Review

Craig Ford Mercury

801 West Victory Way
Craig, CO 81625
(970) 824-9441

Write the first Review
Bear River Valley Co-Op

193 E Jefferson Ave
Hayden, CO 81639
(970) 276-3313

Write the first Review

Cook Chevrolet Jeep Subaru

1776 W Victory Way
Craig, CO 81625
(970) 824-2100

Write the first Review
Victory Motors of Craig

2705 W 1st St
Craig, CO 81625
(970) 824-4422

Write the first Review

View more Auto Repair Shops in Savery, Wyoming

Data provided in part by Localeze.
This information is provided by third parties, may include errors or be out-of-date, and is subject to our Visitor Agreement.

View all Carbon County, Wyoming Cities Auto Repair Shops

Savery, WY Car Consumer Discussions

Saveri...: by jlewelling1 on Wed Jul 02 12:00:00 PDT 2003; You are right. The main point is that the Japanese do a good job and the Big Three don't. Toyotas and Hondas will last for 10-12 years or more. Ford, Chrysler and GMC cars won't. I don't expect to every buy a Ford, Chrysler or GM car again,

jlewelling1: by saveri on Wed Jul 02 11:35:18 PDT 2003; Failure within the scope of a customer's usage is any part/system not performing it's intended function during a pre-defined useful life period. If a part fails after meeting the pre-defined metric it has satisfied it's expected life. No engineer designs a part to fail within the expected life period. The usual failures you see in the field are not extreme circumstances. Most field failures are due to not understanding the system environment completely i.e. customer usage, physical environment, etc. The tests that are performed do not always adequately reflect real world usage. It is not simply a "tolerance" issue. Engineering is not an exact science and to become a good engineer it take years of experience with a single system/commodity. The Big 3 keep shuffling/promoting people around and there are not a lot of system experts left. Everyone is a jack of all trades and a master of none. The Japanese succeed where the Big 3 don't because they have a fundamentally different philosophy in what constitutes good engineering. Plus they believe in the value of developing engineers in a single commodity i.e. doors, seats, etc.. Anyway I digress, don't want to get into a long winded discussion.

Saveri: by lfike on Wed Jul 02 08:51:28 PDT 2003; you said: Naturally no one wants to spend $10/part when $5 would suffice. how long do automotive companies want their parts to last is the question. yes I also believe they are designed to last for x amount of years. On the other had...I think that Chrysler has done a very good job on designing their vehicles. Though keep in mind that looks are only skin deep..and you guys thought it only pertained to people eh?

lfike: by saveri on Wed Jul 02 06:27:36 PDT 2003; I work in the auto industry and my dealings with field warranty failures have essentially shown me the following generic issue: Warranty always indicates a lack of understanding of complete system function and interaction. No one design's a part to fail, it is a very expensive proposition to all parties involved. The part fails because the validation tests performed did not capture 1) customer usage 2) vehicle environment. Naturally no one wants to spend $10/part when $5 would suffice. The question with evaluating reducing costs is how well the engineering behind the change is done. More money does not mean better engineering.

Saveri: by lfike on Wed Jul 02 05:30:38 PDT 2003; you said: Cheap parts vs. cheap labor are 2 different things. How do you know the Chrysler parts are cheap? Warranty is not a guaranteed indicator of cheap parts, it is an indicator of poor/inadequate design. The people who designed the parts did not anticipate all the ways the part is stressed under daily use. You can have an poorly designed expensive part fail. I agree with your first comment....though I disagree with your second concerning the Warranty. I also agree with the poorly design comment...hey two out of three ain't bad..;>)

lfike: by saveri on Tue Jul 01 07:49:02 PDT 2003; Cheap parts vs. cheap labor are 2 different things. How do you know the Chrysler parts are cheap? Warranty is not a guaranteed indicator of cheap parts, it is an indicator of poor/inadequate design. The people who designed the parts did not anticipate all the ways the part is stressed under daily use. You can have an poorly designed expensive part fail. Just wanted to clarify the above issue. Not intending to make any statements of where labor should or should not be kept.

Find Auto Repair Shops by: State