Locate an Auto Repair Shop in Ash Fork, Arizona

We are in the same boat... um, or Acadia. We have had no issues since we bought it in 2009, but all of a sudden it's stranded me twice in the same week... after we noticed a leak in our sunroof. We brought it in and the sunroof seal was supposedly intact. Love my car, but I'm browsing other makes now... SO FRUSTRATING!! Good luck to you.

If we can look into this further with you, please get in touch via email with more information (your name/Edmunds username, contact information, the last 8 of your VIN and current mileage, and the name of your dealership) and we'd be happy to assist! Sarah GM Customer Service

After having several issues with my 2008 GMC Acadia, today I pull into the parking lot at work, put the car in park, remove the key from the ignition and the car keeps running! It took nearly 2 minutes for the car to turn off, finally sputtering to a stall. Last month we experienced water leaks due to faulty drainage tubes, which my dealership said was really a seal that needed to be replaced for $1300, even though we have extended warranty (SHADY!). We've had the steering gear replaced twice. I LOVE my Acadia, but this is starting to get ridiculous.

This car on noneck link below belongs to me. I am the second owner, listed on title as 2dr.malibu, came with concours package. has the buick interior, heavy duty carpet pad, wood grain dash, rear ash trays and all the emblems.Came with 307 2speed power glide. From what i have read, long story short, there was a fire that destroyed a lot of the stock interior that normaly goes into the malibu coupes. They finished up the cars that were on the line with the concours interior package. Also there was a strike going on at the time of the fire, assembly was done by management.

It's still in litigation, so to say that they can prove it is not entirely proven yet. Once it is finalized, only then will anyone be able to say for sure. Proving it and satisfying the FTC is also 2 different things. As in any court case, proving and winning doesn't always go hand in hand. What's still in litigation? That GM requires an oil that produces lower ash deposits? That GM requires the oil to be much thinner at -40f than the API does? That Dexos addresses the timing chain stretch problems GM was experiencing even with oils that met it's 4718M spec (Which also greatly exceeded API and ILSAC) Who ever an O.E contracts to to make their oil you can be assured finds enough of a reason to make an oil that meets that O.E's specs. On the flip side of that, let's assume that an oil does meet the specs of a certain product. That may not always be the correct product. While that may look like doubletalk, an oil that meets GM's dexos 1 specs cannot meet BMW's specs even though they could both be SAE 5W30. An oil that is licensed as dexos can only be if it meets dexos specs and that's why this has all come about. But it's not new. Ford's proprietary specs started in 2004. For some five years almost no-one knew that Fords specs exceeded that of everything on the market in the 5W20 range, except for Motorcraft that had the spec on the bottle. Even Mobil 1 only said "suitable for", fully admitting close to, but not. actually meeting the specs completely.