1992 Pontiac Firebird Review

TMV:
Appraise your car

Photos

N/A

Editors' Rating

Not Yet Rated | Read the Model Review

Fuel Economy

18 mpg

The Edmunds.com review of the 1992 Pontiac Firebird is unavailable at this time.

Consumer Ratings & Reviews

TA look alike

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 9 Fun-to-Drive: 10 Build Quality: 10
Comfort: 10 Interior Design: 10 Reliability: 10
Fuel Economy: 8 Exterior Design: 10

Vehicle

1992 Pontiac Firebird 2 Dr STD Coupe

Review

When i bought my 1992 firebird about three years ago, i had the idea to swap out the 3.1 l v6 till i learned how well the engine performed in the car. The car is defenitly worth the money. I never had to put a part in it besides tires and it starts no matter where or how cold it is outside. It is the most fun car i have ever driven, nd i have driven everything from corvettes to tuners. And my t-tops never leaked either

Favorite Features

The t-tops, the handling, the comfortable seats, and nicely styled interior and exterior

Suggested Improvements

A little power would never hurt, but it is only a 6 cylinder so it isn't the worst

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Like being on a picnic all day

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 10 Fun-to-Drive: 10 Build Quality: 10
Comfort: 9 Interior Design: 9 Reliability: 10
Fuel Economy: 9 Exterior Design: 10

Vehicle

1992 Pontiac Firebird 2 Dr Formula Coupe

Review

This is a fun car! I had some trouble with electrical but the engine just keeps on running. I have 268,000 and it's like the Duracell Bunny. I look to have it for many years.

Favorite Features

T-tops

Suggested Improvements

Electrical system

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

family bird

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 10 Fun-to-Drive: 10 Build Quality: 9
Comfort: 9 Interior Design: 10 Reliability: 10
Fuel Economy: 7 Exterior Design: 10

Vehicle

1992 Pontiac Firebird 2 Dr STD Coupe

Review

i purchased this car from my father in 2002 and have been pleased with it ever since. this car is very reliable with just normal parts replacement (battery,tires etc). this has to be the funnest car i have ever had and the power and performance are great. this car will stay in the family and i hope it will be enjoyed by my son as much as my father and i have enjoyed it.

Favorite Features

body styling and interior.

Suggested Improvements

a few too many rattles and a little more power wouldnt hurt.

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

92 automatic convertilble

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 8 Fun-to-Drive: 10 Build Quality: 10
Comfort: 8 Interior Design: 10 Reliability: 10
Fuel Economy: 10 Exterior Design: 10

Vehicle

1992 Pontiac Firebird 2 Dr STD Convertible

Review

Excellent ride for a sports car. Good sound system, could use some after market speakers. No major repairs ever. The top isnt power but is easy to handle alone. great cornering. Does seem to go through tires fast! Braking is my only complaint disc from drum rear, needs disc all around like the new ones have.

Favorite Features

proformance is good for an inexpensive sports car.

Suggested Improvements

Power top would be great, and disc brakes on the rear tires are needed.

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

92 305

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 9 Fun-to-Drive: 10 Build Quality: 8
Comfort: 9 Interior Design: 8 Reliability: 8
Fuel Economy: 8 Exterior Design: 9

Vehicle

1992 Pontiac Firebird 2 Dr STD Coupe

Review

My Second firebird, decent power for a 305. Body style is a real eye catcher. Engine is durable and reliable, drivetrain is solid and the construction seems strong. FBody has been plagued with annoying squeeks for years. GM never did manage to work out all of those bugs. Wet traction is not the best. But the car manages the look and feel it was designed to produce.

Favorite Features

Exterior appearance, solid transmission.

Suggested Improvements

More powerful engine, more room on the passenger side and (numerically) larger drive ratio at rear axle.

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Buying & Selling

Vehicle Details

Multimedia

  • Photos
  • Photo Archive

Ratings & Reviews

Payment Calculators

Helpful Tools

Advertisement

Advertisement