I still have her at 607K+.
Yes, a bit underpowered, but such a mechanically sound car.
Simple maintenance and regular driving will keep this engine for many years and even 15 years later, is still a cute little car.
Only aesthetic prob that exists w/lot of Nissans is that the paint decays faster - not sure why, but true.
Man. tranny is one of the easiest and long-lasting - clutch replaced at 582K for 1st time.
Was just in shop for radiator replacement (and brake pads) - original radiator so figure can't beat that.
AC is still strong and has never needed work (other than hoses, etc.) and always a pleasure to drive.
Will keep running her until she finally dies-Best car ever had.
*External design-still cute after 15 yrs.
*Reliability is almost unparalleled...
*Internal headroom (even w/sunroof) accommodates to 6'4" easily.
*Maintenance is easy - well placed engine components
*Easy/consistent/enduring manual tranny/clutch
*Deceptively roomy trunk space for very small car
*Visibility to all sides and rear
*Convenient placement of internal features
*Green fuel mileage before green was in - still gets 33 or so city in short distance driving - about 38 weekend longer distances; when younger, she would average 35-38 city and was known to get 45 highway. (Note:
the younger mpgs were w/out AC running)
Would not have had many:
*AC significantly pulls down the performance and mileage of the little 1.6L engine.
*Alternator gives way consistently at about 200K
*A few problems caused by low profile and sport suspension - bottoms out easily and hubs and axles take a beating.
Not a car if smooth ride is your most important thing.
*Manufacturer supplied Dunlop tires were the pits - almost wrecked in heavy t'storm her 1st year in 360 spin - changing tires resolved from that point forward
*Recommended tire pressure (29/33) is critical - most will do 29/29-be specific at maintenance facilities and check it - reduces mpg and tendency to cause rear-end shimmy if not right.
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.