1998 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class Consumer Discussions

Mercedes-Benz SL and SLK (all models)

I seem to remember

Written by: marsha7 on Jul 15, 2006 01:13 PM

a long time ago, that there was a website, maybe Mercedes own site, maybe an independent sit, that would list each year and model, and, like a brochure of that year, would list the various options, exterior and interior colors that were available in that year... I am trying to determine the colors that the 1996-1998 SL500 came in...if I had my druthers, I would like ... Read More...

I have similar thoughts

Written by: marsha7 on Jul 13, 2006 06:46 PM

to the posters above...I am contemplating a SL500, 1996-1998...quick check of KBB brought prices of about 20-25K, unless I made some major (minor?) mistake... Anything specific to these models to be on the lookout for???...I have admired Benzes for years, dreamed about owning one, now dreaming further... Since the cars are 8-10 years old, should I expect ... Read More...

Re: 2005 MB SL500 [habitat1]

Written by: merc1 on Mar 19, 2006 01:22 PM

I also think Mercedes is cannibalizing on the SL with its other models. It used to be that the SL was the only non-sedan in Mercedes lineup. Now you have the CL, CLS and SLK and CLK Cab all nicking away at the SL's market. It also used to be that the SL500 was the top dog in terms of Mercedes performance. Now, unfortunately, compared to the competition, it is just a dog. ... Read More...

Mercedes cruise control problem

To mbukukanyau

Written by: mpyles1 on Aug 08, 2003 11:20 AM

First, apologies to Mr. Shiftright for answering mbukukanyau's question here. I tried the Smart Shopper and Coupes & Convertibles boards that mentioned Mercedes, but they were "read only" boards. I just bought an SL500 that, so far, is wonderful. Yesterday I was reading the new Road & Track comparo of luxury convertible test drives that included ... Read More...

Mercedes-Benz SL and SLK (all models)

I'm not saying.....

Written by: toyotas1 on Mar 10, 2002 03:43 PM

the Lexus is better, just as close to perfection as the SL. It needs better seats, a lower first gear, and some suspension tweaks for better ride/handling balance. The SL needs to upgrade the interior materials, add some 1998 interior luxury features, lose those stupid hood vents, and lower the price below $80k. And where is "Benz", Mr. Talk-a-lot-of-stuff.........I ... Read More...

Toyotas1

Written by: merc1 on Mar 09, 2002 07:53 AM

Long as you yourself say the Benz is the better car the rest of your post is rendered pointless. No convertible is perfect true, but Mercedes is the best there is at Luxury convertibles. Only Ferrari and Porsche build one any better. Your theory about the CLK having the market to itself in 1998 is just an excuse, it isn't Mercedes' fault Lexus was late to the drop-top-luxury ... Read More...

toyotas1

Written by: merc1 on Mar 08, 2002 11:09 PM

Style is of course your opinion, though it's not shared in the least. What other car in it's 5th year is still a hard to get item? It certainly wasn't the previous SC300/400 from Lexus. It most likely won't be the current SC430 either. The CLK has been a consistant hit ever since 1998. Period. After 1995 Lexus couldn't give away SC300/400s. The CLK has the weaker design? ... Read More...