2013 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring 4dr SUV (2.0L 4cyl 6A)
We loved our 2006 330i dearly - but we were conscious about the spiralling fuel costs as well as ptential maintenance cost for the bimmer though we were yet to have any.
My wife and I were int he market for a long time and I had 3 cars that I was considering - GMC Terrain, Honda CRV and well, a used Q5. And that is when I drove the CX5. I new that the 2.0 litre engine will never satisfy coming from the 3 litre Bimmer V6. I was just hoping that it does not disappoint me completely. I must say I was pleasantly surprised with the capability of the mazda powertrain. I could live with it. For my priorities this was the overal winner.
1.Aggressive exterior, tasteful, yet subtle interior
2.Drives great - communicates well with the driver
3.Great with mpg - I get about 27 - with 80% city commute.
1. This could be a bimmer to mazda transition issue - I thought the steering wheel could be a bit tighter.
2. Front passenger seat is not power assisted even in GT version - why mazda?
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.