The 2012 CR-V has a lot to offer.
Ergonomically, it is very practical - everything is within the driver's reach, including climate controls, radio controls (which are redundant on the steering wheel), bluetooth, etc.
The instrument cluster is a fresh design and its fuel economy is certainly respectable for a small SUV (I average about 26-29 depending on type of driving: city v. highway).
There is ample room in the rear seats for average-sixed adults.
The powertrain operates very smoothly and the vehicle, overall, have a very car-like driving demeanor.
iPod connectivity; bluetooth capability (this feature only works 100% with Blackberry phones); sunroof;
I used to own a 2005 Ford Expedition Eddie Bauer model.
While comparing the CR-V to an Expedition is like comparing apples to oranges, I can honestly say I am disappointed with the lack of power and torque.
In all reality, my Expedition was no quicker to 60 MPH than the CR-V, but it certainly felt more promising when accelerating.
The CR-V lacks torque, which is necessary when merging on to the highway, taking off from a stoplight, etc.
In addition, the transmission only offers five ratios; most of the CR-V's competitors offer six speeds or even continuously variable transmissions.
Overall, it's a great vehicle but the powertrain needs to be updated.
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.