As so many Hollywood blockbusters have proven, if something
works once, why not try it again? Last year, we decided to try
something completely different by inviting six regular consumers to
do a comparison test of three popular midsize sedans -- without the
sponsorship of a specific manufacturer. They poked and prodded each
car using the same criteria Edmunds editors use when evaluating a
vehicle. The result was an enlightening experience for the
consumers involved, the Edmunds.com editors and, judging by
feedback, the readers at home.
For the sequel, we rounded up three economy sedans: the two
best-selling models (Toyota Corolla and Honda Civic) and the one we
consider to be the best (Mazda 3). We also invited a fourth
dark-horse contender to the party, but the
Mitsubishi Lancer that
showed up featured a fancy stereo, a sunroof and a $3,000-higher
price tag. It was disqualified before the test started for being
too far out of the price range. As such, the remaining three
contenders were priced within $479 of each other, giving our
testers the chance to see how much equipment each brand provides
for basically the same amount of dough. Each car was also right off
the boat (or train), with miles in the low hundreds or less. In
other words, nothing was given an undue advantage. Here's a
rundown of the cars.
2008 Honda Civic LX
Base MSRP (including destination charge): $18,395
Options: None
MSRP (including destination charge):
$18,395
2008 Mazda Mazda3 i Touring Value Edition
Base MSRP (including destination charge): $18,130
Options: None
MSRP (including destination charge):
$18,130
2009 Toyota Corolla XLE
Base MSRP (including destination charge): $18,210
Options: Upgraded Stereo ($200 -- includes in-dash six-CD
changer with MP3/WMA playback, six speakers and satellite
pre-wiring); Carpet Floor Mats ($199)
MSRP (including destination charge):
$18,609
As before, we selected our team of six consumer reviewers on the
basis of a 250-word essay and the desire to represent a
cross-section of the American buying public. The resulting group
consisted of two women and four men, with ages that ranged from
27-68. They came from opposite sides of the country, from
Washington to Massachusetts and from what looks to be the literal
middle of America -- Atlanta, Kansas. Some were married, some had
kids, one was retired; a few were self-described car
enthusiasts.
We brought our melting pot to Willow Springs Raceway in
Rosamond, California, where they combed over the three economy
cars. They drove on a simulated city driving loop and an actual
highway, did acceleration and panic braking tests, and then hit the
Streets of Willow racetrack (which we dubbed the "Hill
Course" to subliminally discourage outright hooliganism). They
also noted interior comfort, design and build quality, along with
whatever else they thought was important to their buying decision.
Our editors and testing team were there to describe what the
consumer reviewers should be looking and feeling for in each test,
but we kept our opinions to ourselves.
The six consumers then headed home to accomplish the toughest
part yet: Write an 800-word evaluation of the three cars and rank
them. They could write it any way they wanted, and we would keep
our editing to an absolute minimum. Now, here are their uncensored
thoughts and observations.
Anne Adams
Age: 60
Resides in: Decatur, Texas
Occupation: IT project manager
Personal status: Married, no children
Currently drives: 2007 Toyota Camry
I'm not a car nut. In fact, I shouldn't have been
chosen to test-drive these cars for Edmunds.com. I don't know
the terms; I don't understand what variable valve timing is or
whether 128 pound-feet of torque at 4,300 rpm is better than 128
lb-ft of torque at 4,400 rpm. But I had a blast comparing these
cars, and I learned so much. I was definitely impressed with the
features that come standard on these economy cars. Every one had
seats that raised and lowered, adjustable steering columns, power
windows and door locks, powered side mirrors and lots of other very
nice features. The editors and engineers at Edmunds.com explained
how to be analytical in our comparisons and how to think critically
about the cars before they turned us loose to drive them.
Of course, I didn't remain rational for long and jumped to
some conclusions right off the bat after driving the Honda Civic.
It was my favorite car for all kinds of reasons including the fuel
mileage (25 city/36 highway), the hot red color and even the giant
digital speedometer sitting up there in the split-level dash. The
interior had a pleasing combination of materials as well as
easy-to-use features like the auxiliary port for my iPod and mirror
controls right on the door where they ought to be.
The Civic's handling felt crisp with responsive steering and
a good feel for the road. It just felt trustworthy. It comes fully
equipped with side curtain airbags and ABS brakes, which added to
that sense of security. To be truthful, I'm probably somewhat
biased because I've driven Hondas for several years, and I know
how reliable they are. When I drove this car out on the highway, it
had great acceleration and the promise of plenty more where that
came from in case I needed to pass someone. This car took the bumps
in the street with grace and stability, and takes 1st place in my
ranking of the three cars we drove.
However...I really, really liked the Mazda3. I've never even
set foot in a Mazda before, and I was really impressed. The
interior was finished with attractive black cloth upholstery and a
stylish black dash with red accents. The seats were comfortable in
both the front and the back, with an armrest in the backseat (the
only one provided as standard equipment among the three) and enough
cupholders so that everyone can bring their water bottle AND their
latte. There was ample legroom in the backseat, and with the
armrest I could have ridden very comfortably for long
distances.
This car definitely handled well, with a smooth ride and good
acceleration. In fact the only downsides I found aren't really
showstoppers at all: The trunk was snug and not as easy to use and
the fuel economy was the worst of the three we drove, which still
isn't too bad (23 city/31 highway). I would consider this a
very close 2nd and definitely worth checking out, especially if a
sporty look and feel is what you're shopping for.
When I drove the new 2009 model Corolla I really wanted to like
it, but it just didn't have much to offer in sportiness or
features. Basically this car handles like my
Camry, with its cushy ride and
unresponsive steering. Some of the features the Corolla does have
don't seem very well thought out. The auxiliary port for my
iPod wasn't really close to the power outlet, and there's
no place to set the device once you do manage to get it all plugged
in.
On the positive side, the Corolla has the best gas mileage of
the three (27 city/35 highway), as well as easier access to the
trunk and really lovely plastic wood trim, but it just felt less
powerful, especially getting on the freeway. It didn't help
that it was a seafoam green on the outside, and it really felt like
a low-end rental car you wouldn't want to get stuck driving.
Unfortunately, it was easy to place it 3rd in my ranking. Toyota
can do better than this!
After this experience I feel so much more confident that I can
make a good decision about the next vehicle I buy, and I believe if
you follow the process we went through in comparing cars, then
you'll have that same level of assurance. (Of course as an
Edmunds.com reader you already know all this, right?) I have to
confess that the last time we shopped for a new car, we bought the
first one we tried. My recommendation now would be, "Don't
do that!" Drive and compare; you may be surprised what's
out there.
Final Ranking:
- Honda Civic
- Mazda Mazda3
- Toyota Corolla
Julie Headrick
Age: 37
Resides in: Atlanta, Kansas
Occupation: Marketing director for long-term care
center
Personal status: Married with four children, ages
4, 6, 9 and 11
Currently drives: 2002 Dodge Intrepid, 2000 Dodge
Ram 2500
It didn't take me long to see where I fit in
demographically speaking -- the soccer mom -- although with a
twist. I've been born, raised and am now raising our four kids
in smack-dab Middle America: Kansas to be specific, and on a
farm.
When I learned we were comparing three foreign economy sedans, I
knew I could be completely impartial -- I don't recall ever
driving anything but domestic vehicles! I also compared these
vehicles for the use of the average family of 2.4 children (which
would be two kiddos and three months pregnant -- been there, done
that!)
3rd place: Toyota Corolla
The Corolla is what I'd describe as a soft ride -- soft
suspension, soft pedals, more body roll than the Honda Civic and
Mazda3 and on the acceleration test. I didn't feel like I had
much contact with the road. It felt very unstable at higher speeds.
It also had the cheapest feel -- it didn't even have cruise
control. We made the mistake of flipping the visor up and were
amused to hear a "tin can" sound that carried over to the
doors. While floor mats were standard on the other models, mats for
the Corolla add $199 to the bill.
However, there are some bright spots on this car. On a hard
stop, the Corolla stopped well and had the quietest ride of the
cars. Another plus: The Corolla got top honors with the car seat --
easy in/out and still room in the passenger seat.
Who would like this car? An older driver who likes a quiet, easy
ride and guaranteed stops.
2nd place: Mazda Mazda3
The 3 was FUN! You instantly feel younger behind the wheel.
The suspension is nice and tight, with great handling (the wider
17-inch tires helped here) and I couldn't keep from smiling
while running the hill course -- I mean, how often does a mother of
four get handed a helmet and told to go for it? The interior had a
sporty feel and had the most steering wheel controls of the models
we tested. Another feature I liked was the glove compartment -- the
Mazda Web site says you can fit most laptops in it, and I believe
it.
The 3 had the tightest turning radius and I never noticed the
brakes getting hot during the hill course -- this was possibly due
to the disc brakes. The 3's brakes made me feel like I would
have good control in what would most likely be a bad situation.
The cons to the 3 would be more problematic for "soccer
moms." First, don't plan on carrying a passenger in the
front if you have a rear-facing car seat in the back passenger side
-- I couldn't get my legs in the vehicle! And although there
are seatbelts for five passengers, I'd hate to be the fifth
person sitting in the middle of the backseat -- definitely needs to
be a child under 10!
I also hated the instrument panel. The tach, speedometer and
other gauges were all in separate housings, giving the instruments
a tunnel-vision look. Also, the "manual" shifting option
was a waste as it only seemed to work about one out of three times.
I finally gave up on it and ignored it.
Who would like this car? A younger adult (notice I didn't
say teenager -- it would only get them in trouble) or someone
without kids still in car seats.
1st place: Honda Civic
The Civic was my Switzerland -- completely neutral. It's
not too fuddy-duddy, and not sporty enough to cause my insurance
rates to rise due to speeding tickets. It had the best overall
interior with top-notch trim and fit, and nice contrasts of color,
texture and style. The Civic also had the best-feeling steering
wheel, the best ride, the best instrument panel, the best seats and
the best legroom in the backseat. You could fit a family of four or
five in this vehicle without much trouble and still have room in
the trunk for luggage.
One disappointment I had with the Civic was the latching system
for car seats. The latches were positioned where it was almost
impossible to latch the seat in, and getting it out wasn't much
easier. I'd buy another car seat over trying to transfer one to
and from the Civic on a regular basis. Also, while the Civic has
storage pockets in the door panels, there were only cupholders in
the front -- cups don't stay upright when left in kids'
hands!
On the mechanical side of things, the brakes were smelling hot
after only seven rounds on the hill course, and the transmission
seemed to have a bit of a lag that I noticed on the city driving
and freeway driving.
Who would like this car? A family of five or less. Ample room
and still sporty enough to know you're not driving a wagon or
minivan.
Final Ranking:
- Honda Civic
- Mazda Mazda3
- Toyota Corolla
Damien Gaudet
Age: 27
Resides in: Worcester, Massachusetts
Occupation: Graphic/Web designer
Personal status: Single, no children
Currently drives: 2001 Ford Focus ZX3
Let's start with a quick definition:
"ec·o·nom·i·cal --
Prudent and thrifty in management; not wasteful or extravagant.
Intended to save money." I like that last part. Who
doesn't like to save money, right? What we have here are three
ways to give up that road tank you've been commuting in and
save some cash.
3rd place (a very, very distant 3rd place) --
Bringing up the rear, we have the Toyota Corolla. This thing
handles like it's in a bowl of Jell-o and has seats only a
grandmother could love. Every time I got into this car I
couldn't help but think I was riding in a rolling La-Z-Boy. But
maybe that's your thing, maybe you want some super-soft seats
and you're more concerned with where you're going than how
you got there. If that's the case, then the Corolla may be for
you. Just remember that it's severely lacking in the fun
department.
All that body roll, mushy brake feel and sloppy steering
could be forgiven if it managed to be the serene mini-Camry it
wants to be. But alas, this thing's engine makes you hear every
awful decibel in the cabin. And get this: no cruise control.
That's right, the only car here not to come standard with it
was the Corolla. And for a car destined to be clogging up left
lanes everywhere as a daily commuter, that seems like a big
misstep.
Some people call it "soul," the French call it that
certain, "
Je ne sais quoi." Any way you put it, this Toyota
doesn't have it.
2nd place -- Now things get more difficult. First
and 2nd place were close, very close. After putting the Mazda3
through the ringer on the track and doing some highway cruising,
it's easy to see why the 3 has been such a great seller for
Mazda. It's a fun car to drive. It won't pin you to the
seat or do burnouts, but it will make that slog to work a heck of a
lot more enjoyable. The Mazda sets itself apart from the other two,
with 17-inch alloy wheels and disc brakes all around. The steering
is tight and the ride lets you know what's going on without
being overly harsh. To complete the sporty theme, it's also the
only car here to offer a manumatic mode for the automatic
transmission, but it's more of a novelty than anything of
actual use. As far as the interior goes, some people might think it
a bit dark and gloomy, but to me it looks upscale and feels almost
European. The piano black trim on the dash is a nice touch, and the
seats are very well bolstered and supportive. When you have some
friends along for the ride, the backseat isn't a half-bad place
to be. Unless of course, you stick three friends back there, where
the bump in the back of the middle passenger would make anyone
prefer to walk. The 3 is the only car in the test to offer a rear
armrest, which also has two extra cupholders.
With all the things going for the 3, it's due for a
refresh. Not that it's a bad-looking car, it's just a bit
long in the tooth. For example, it's the one car here that
still has an external antenna, and it's a big one.
Bottom line: Even in its econo-car, Mazda delivers some
"zoom-zoom" fun for the commuting masses.
1st place -- For me, the Honda just managed to
come out on top. This car makes you feel like you paid a lot more
for it than you actually did. Quality plastics, different textures
and colors, and a headliner that wasn't made of mouse fur all
help confirm this isn't your father's econobox.
This car is modern, I repeat,
maw-dern. Some might even say futuristic with its
spaceship exterior and split digital dash. I like the big digital
speedometer readout, as it requires only a slight glance down from
the road to see what speed you're traveling. The Civic also is
the only car here to offer a five-speed transmission.
In the twisties, the Civic inspires confidence. The perfectly
sized steering wheel provides great feedback, and that enables you
to really push to the car's limits (granted, not very fast
limits) with ease. A supple ride without all the body roll found in
the Corolla tops it off.
No car is perfect, especially at this price point, but the
Civic's faults are few and far between. The rear seat isn't
split and only folds down as one piece. Also, as nice as the seat
material feels, its towellike texture left me wondering how well it
would hold up over the years.
All in all, the Civic is better than any so-called "economy
car" has a right to be. If you love to drive but haven't
saved quite enough pennies for that Ferrari, you owe it to yourself
to check out this car.
Final Ranking:
- Honda Civic
- Mazda Mazda3
- Toyota Corolla
Sean Bresnahan
Age: 40
Resides in: Spokane, Washington
Occupation: Commercial loan officer
Personal status: Married with two children, ages 4
and 7
Currently drives: 1997 Audi A6 Quattro, 2004 Honda
Odyssey
Yes, you can get value and entertainment in one package. The
sedans Edmunds.com assembled for comparison pack features and
performance that would make their 10-year-old predecessors blush.
After a day of poking, prodding and flogging the Civic, Corolla and
Mazda3 at Willow Springs Raceway, here's what I walked away
with.
Number 3: 2009 Toyota Corolla XLE First, who chose
the seafoam green? Color aside, the new Corolla doesn't stray
from its original formula that should appeal to those who like
Buicks.
The exterior and interior styling is the most conservative of
the bunch. The exterior looks better than the previous generation,
as the front end, grille and light design are more aggressive.
Still, no one will run for the hills when confronted by it. The
overall design is pure Toyota, with the body taking on the
silhouette of its bigger sibling, the Camry.
The first thing you notice inside is the plood, lots of plastic
wood, that has an unnatural orange hue and high gloss that will
cause PTSD. The quality of the materials is average, while the
overall build quality is solid. The dash and controls are well laid
out. Why is it missing cruise control? Seat comfort is lousy.
They're soft, offer little lumbar or thigh support and are
covered in furry fabric. The backseat, however, offered the most
legroom and was comfortable, despite the lack of a rear center
armrest. The trunk is the largest and by far the easiest to
load.
Driving dynamics match the rest of the package. Off-the-line
response is sluggish, as the engine doesn't hit its sweet spot
until 3,000 rpm and things get almost farm implement-buzzy at about
5,000 rpm. Vague steering and substantial body lean don't
inspire confidence, especially in an emergency situation. Although
braking performance seemed decent, the pedal felt it would be
pushed through the floor.
I would recommend this car to...wait, I'm still
thinking.
Number 2: 2008 Honda Civic LX
The styling of the Honda is the most futuristic. Initially, I
found both the interior and exterior styling garish, but grew to
like the thoughtfulness of the design. My biggest gripe was with
the expansive dash and the two-tiered instrument cluster; however,
I did notice how easy it was to see the speed in my peripheral
vision and leave my eyes where they should be: on the road.
The Civic had the best overall build quality. Body gaps were
consistently tight and the interior's various textures broke up
the monotony of its camel color. Expansive glass and the light
interior color made the interior feel the most spacious of all.
Although the multitude of buttons gives the dash a busy appearance,
the controls are fairly intuitive.
For an average commuter, this car strikes the right balance
between comfort and responsiveness. Push it beyond 75 percent of
its capabilities, though, and it lets you know it's not happy.
Steering feel is a bit light, but feedback is good. Body roll gets
crazy when pushed, although much of that is the tires.
In my mind, Honda builds the best four-cylinder. The sound is
sweet, right up to redline. The five-speed automatic didn't
have a manual feature, but was the most responsive and held right
to redline before upshifting, making this car feel fast. Combine
that with the EPA-combined mileage estimate of 29 mpg and you have
an urban traffic fighter that's easy on the wallet.
Great car, but didn't stir up my emotions. Maybe in the Si
version.
Grand Prize: 2008 Mazda Mazda3 i Touring
Want the most bang for your buck and are willing to give up
some mpg for it? This is the commuter for you. It's amazing;
this car is in its fifth year competing against newer designs and
it still beats them.
The exterior design is still fresh, with a tight, athletic
appearance and minimal overhangs. Build quality is good with
consistent gaps, but still not as tight as the Honda. The 17-inch
wheels further set it apart from the others by exposing four-wheel
disc brakes. The others have rear drums.
The interior is a bit stark, but is well laid out. The
materials, other than the door panels, are high quality. You settle
into firm, supportive seats and grasp a thick, small-diameter
steering wheel. Wait, what's that? Cruise control
and radio buttons on the spokes! A downside is the cramped
backseat.
The engine is eager to rev, but sounds like an Osterizer blender
crushing ice. The four-speed transmission has the only manual shift
feature, but it's useless, as the computer steps in early and
often.
The glory of this car is the suspension. Although it transmits
more road noise and is punishing on rough roads, it wants to play
like a Labrador puppy. Fittingly, it was the only one where the
tail would wag midcorner with throttle lift off. That's
playful. That's why my money is on the Mazda. The combination
of style and performance for the price is a bargain.
Final Ranking:
- Mazda Mazda3
- Honda Civic
- Toyota Corolla
Chet Flynn
Age: 48
Resides in: Norwell, Massachusetts
Occupation: Sales, distribution and marketing
professional
Personal status: Married with two children, ages
15 and 16
Currently drives: 2003 BMW 330i, 2001 Saab 9-3,
2005 Dodge Sprinter, 2001 Dodge Neon, 1998 Ford Ranger, 1968
Chevrolet Corvette
3rd Place: Toyota Corolla
Toyota is the largest auto manufacturer in the world because
they build a product for every conceivable customer. This Corolla
is aimed at its traditional customer: the (now-aging) baby boomer.
As the customer got older, softer and larger, so did the
Corolla.
This Corolla brings the "full-sized car" experience to
an efficient smaller package. Unfortunately, that experience brings
with it the craptacular road behavior of a mid-'90s big car as
well. Clearly sporty road manners were never mentioned by
Toyota's focus groups. I recommend the Corolla be driven at the
legal limit at all times. It really feels loose and
disconnected.
Overall, the interior is a pleasant place. The front seats are
comfortable. The last time I sat in a seat this soft it had a lever
to recline and pop up a footrest. The interior's high points
were its elegant gauges and the quality of the faux wood trim.
However, I am less enthusiastic about the other choices of
materials.
My guess is the Corolla's target customers' next likely
wheeled purchase will be either a personal mobility scooter or a
snazzy golf cart to cruise the retirement community. Toyota
must have a product plan that includes a Scion sport sedan
to balance its product portfolio.
2nd Place: Mazda Mazda3
The 3 is the hooligan of this group. If you get caught
driving it to its potential on public byways, don't bother
getting your registration ready; just put both arms out the window
to make it easier for the officer to put the cuffs on.
The suspension is predisposed to aggressive on-ramp(ages) rather
than what you hope to do when you get there, i.e. smooth, and in
the 3's case not-so-quiet cruising.
The product development gurus must have thought that attitude
and styling would rule the day, then left early for the beach
before they attended to the interior. After all, the dash seems
inspired by a "beach blaster" with its flashing red LEDs
and complex LCD graphics. The HVAC controls feel as if they are
connected to the car parked next to you, with a linkage built from
an erector set. However, the steering wheel and driving position
are very good.
This car needs a five-speed to be at its best. The automatic
transmission won no fans among aggressive testers as it lazily
shifted short of redline and refused to downshift at critical times
even in the man-u-matic mode.
Still, the 3 had the longest waiting line at the track section.
What a hoot!
1st Place: Honda Civic
Honda is an "engine-centric company." They clearly
love to design engines. So they are forced to build
products to put them in so they get to design more engines. As
expected, the engine in the Civic is wonderful. It feels as if it
would effortlessly rev to infinity if the auto transmission
didn't interrupt.
Given their passion for engines, I suspected they may have
shortchanged the rest of the package; I was wrong.
The interior is graced with multiple complimentary shades,
shapes and textures. Everything you touch is soft plastic and
contrasting texture cloths. The quality of materials from the
headliner to the floor mats is a cut above the rest, and could
justify a higher price point. The gauge layout is eccentric
(OK...it's bizarre) but all the controls are easy to find and
are light and positive in action.
As for the exterior, it's speaking a design language I
didn't learn in school. I would call it the
"otherworldly" school of design. If you put a few gun
turrets on it I could imagine it attacking a Cylon base ship in an
episode of
Battlestar Galactica.
The Civic's suspension settings slots between the Corolla
and the 3. I consider the 3 and the Civic equally capable in
on-road tomfoolery up to the "driving to endanger" level.
If you want to go to jail, the 3 is for you. If you want a family
car that is a sophisticated tourer with sporty overtones, the Civic
is just the item.
At one point I spontaneously said, "I could drive this car
forever." The Civic is just that brilliant. Wait...did
somebody say there was an Si version available? Where do I get in
line for that?
Final Ranking:
- Honda Civic
- Mazda Mazda3
- Toyota Corolla
Jim Smith
Age: 68
Resides in: Tucson, Arizona
Occupation: Retired
Personal status: Married, no children
Currently drives: 2007 Hyundai Santa Fe
I tested the Toyota Corolla XLE, Honda Civic LX and Mazda
Mazda3 i Touring Value Edition. Other comparable autos would
include the
Chevrolet Cobalt,
Dodge Caliber,
Ford Focus,
Hyundai Elantra,
Nissan Sentra,
Saturn Astra and the
Volkswagen Rabbit. Forget
the derogatory "econobox" label of yesteryear for these
three cars. Replace the word "cheap" with
"value" or "quality." Our three test cars had
as standard features antilock brakes, nice interiors, lots of
airbag protection, tire pressure monitors, halogen headlights and
tilt-telescoping steering wheels. The gas mileage is impressive,
and their driving characteristics are much better than just a few
years ago. Some things don't change, however. They are small,
have only two interior color choices and -- to the shame of Honda,
Mazda and Toyota -- none of the three test cars had electronic
stability control (ESC).
The Civic has the most headroom of the three. The EPA highway
mileage rating of 36 is the best of these three cars. The dashboard
has a space-age look, which I quickly grew to like. The
transmission is five-speed, making it smoother than the four-speeds
of the others. There are three trim levels. The radio antenna is
the only glass-mounted of the three. For some reason, Honda is
still using sickle-style trunk lid hinges that consume space, while
the others use hinges that do not take up trunk space. The door
height is the lowest of the three. The intermittent windshield
wiper stage is not adjustable.
The Mazda Mazda3 has the best tilt-telescoping steering wheel
(largest adjustments), the widest front door and smallest turning
circle. (This is great in parking lots.) It has 17-inch wheels as
opposed to 16 inches on the other two cars. There are five trim
levels, plus a hatchback body style. It has the poorest crash test
ratings of the three from the Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety. The EPA highway mileage rating of 31 and city rating of 23
are the lowest in the group. It also has the least trunk space.
The Corolla has the best EPA city mileage rating of 27. I
thought it had the best acceleration of the three. The excellent
glovebox has two compartments with separate doors. The heater
controls are easily the best to see, understand and use. There are
five trim levels. It has the lowest headroom of the three, which
was brought home when wearing a helmet. My head was on the roof and
the side over the door. There was no cruise control on the test
car. The interior door height was the lowest of the three.
In my opinion, the Honda Civic was the best-looking of the three
cars. The windshield juts out front much more than usual. It has
tight steering and a nice, firm ride. The ease of entry and exit
was better than the others. It is fun to drive and I felt extremely
comfortable driving this car. Normal braking was firm and stable.
Panic stops, however, seemed to take more distance to stop than the
other two autos.
Mazda definitely needs new model and trim nomenclature to avoid
confusion. It had the best pedal-to-the-floor acceleration of the
three, with tight steering control. The ride was the harshest of
the three, but that is all right if you want a sporty drive. There
was a lag before passing gear kicked in, plus it was the noisiest
and had the least comfortable seats.
The Toyota had the best manners of the three. It drives like a
mini Buick -- soft and cushy. There is less noise and less jostle
than the other two autos. I felt less in control in this car than
the others, as it has a loose steering feel. The ride is so soft, I
felt like the car was not in total control on bumps and rises.
Toyota saved 30 cents by mounting the outside mirror controls
inconveniently low on the dashboard instead of on the door armrest,
where they belong. Ease of entry and exit is poorest of these three
cars.
As you can see, each car has pluses and minuses in my opinion.
The lack of ESC is somewhat offset by a similar lack of useless
spoilers. Which car is best will depend on the buyer. If you are
looking for a small, inexpensive sporty car, the Mazda3 is your
best choice. The Corolla would be your best choice if you are
simply looking for a comfortable driving car. If you have small
children, probably the Civic would be best. Although I am a little
surprised at the final result, I find it quite easy to give a
final, general, all-around ranking of these three cars.
Final Ranking:
- Honda Civic
- Toyota Corolla
- Mazda Mazda3
