The 2003 LX is NO FUN at all to drive.
The steering is firm but vague, and it
refuses to recenter properly. Brake
feel is appalling.
On the plus side, it is very roomy,
it's cleanly designed (if boring), and
it's fine on the highway. Material
quality is typical for Honda - first
rate, lightyears ahead of anything
built by the US manufacturers.
This car has qained a full quarter-ton
of weight since 1996. It's safer than
the previous generation, but the weight
increase - absent a commensurate power
increase - means that the car is
slooooowww off the line. Cornering is
uninspired, and as I said, braking is
Environmental friendliness, reliability
(except for one problem), high quality
materials (though not as high as
before), exceptional residual values
(meaning it's cheap to drive).
More power. Less weight. BETTER BRAKES.
BETTER STEERING. Also, Honda (if you're
reading this), why are there like 15
different material shades and textures
on the inside?
This is still, overall, a good car. But
by Honda's established standards, it is
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.