Just picked up an LX-S manual.
It has every feature I want and nothing I don't.
Incredible fit and finish, incredible refinement and sportiness, and incredible beauty.
I can't believe that more people aren't buying these.
I love my 2013 Accord LX CVT. Probably the best looking Accord to date. Plenty of power for city driving or the freeway. CVT is a first for me but anytime you can cruise 70 mph @ 19-2000 rpm in a 3200 lb car is a win. Great interior, comfortable seats, great stereo. I managed 38 mpg on the highway today and the car has only 5k so I'm sure it will loosen up a bit once its broken in and gets synthetic oil inside
I have never seen such a heavily optioned Honda for a base vehicle (LX) The EX has a ton of added safety features that would really be nice as well. Really like the i-MID screen/Rear view cam, the stereo is amazing great low frequency (bass) for a stock stereo
CVT does shudder at low speed usually when slowing to a stop or accelerating from a stop. Not sure if this will adversely effect the service life or not. To me it feels more like a manual in those instances and doesn't really bother me. But, Sport mode should be the first drive gear selection NOT second! I made the mistake of shifting down into Low at 55 mph for a brief moment. Do that in an automatic and its probably toast. I would like to see bigger wheels or a lower sidewall ratio but cant complain about a car that has alloy wheels stock. Center console could be a bit longer like my 2010 Civic had that would give you a little more storage space but this is all nit picking
My girlfriend lives in Upstate NY,
hadn't driven her car for three days, and decided to go shopping.
Returning home after a roundtrip of about five miles, she turned off the vehicle for about five minutes and it would not restart. AAA was called and provided a jumpstart, but said their tester indicated the battery would not hold the charge. She them drove the car to the dealer for their assessment. Their answer was that these Accords need to be driven every couple days at least and if not, the owner should buy a trickle charger. A trickle charger? If the car is not driven every couple days? It's a 2013 car, not a 1913.
Honda needs to address this issue.
Not the battery.
If you live in the northern half of the US
or in any cold climate,
you apparently need to drive your 2103 Honda Accord
every couple or three days whether you need to or not or suffer the consequences.....calling AAA regularly OR buying a trickle charger.
My suggestion? Honda should admit their mistake and replace the weak batteries upon request of the owners. And Consumer Report should note this issue when they review the 2013 Accord.
2013 Honda Accord EX-L w/Navigation 2dr Coupe (2.4L 4cyl CVT)
I traded in a 2008 Accord sedan for this 2013 Accord Coupe, EX with leather and nav. I wish I hadn't done that. Why?
The primary reason is the Coupe's ride quality. My 2008 Accord was smooth as silk. The new car is best described as uncomfortably harsh. You feel every bump. I could see this being an exhausting ride, especially for a long drive.
Maybe new tires will help? I probably won't know for 3 years or so, when it's time to get new tires. Assuming I can deal with riding in a car with no suspension for 3 years.
I suggest anyone considering a new Accord take the car for a lengthy test drive over a variety of street surfaces.
--Completely re-do the suspension? Go back to what they had for the prior generation Accord?
--Fix the glitchy software
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.