1997 GMC Sonoma Review

TMV:
Appraise your car

Photos

N/A

Editors' Rating

Not Yet Rated | Read the Model Review

Fuel Economy

17 - 23 mpg

The Edmunds.com review of the 1997 GMC Sonoma is unavailable at this time.

Consumer Ratings & Reviews

terrible build

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 3 Fun-to-Drive: 10 Build Quality: 1
Comfort: 8 Interior Design: 8 Reliability: 1
Fuel Economy: 8 Exterior Design: 8

Vehicle

1997 GMC Sonoma 2 Dr SLS Sport Extended Cab Stepside SB

Review

I do love my truck its looks good. Other than that since I've owned it it has spent more time in a parking spot. One thing after another from a tensioner to the transmission has approx 87,000 miles. the transmission is a good one I've reseached it and it has many many applications I think that the inside apecs should have been researched a bit more this is probally the nost popular transmission the 4L60 just has different for each vehicle Never should have put a 4 cylinder automatic in an extended cab

Favorite Features

The color (black),look the stepside

Suggested Improvements

Research the transmission specs. GM really should have thought about installing only 6 cylinder engines. once the A?C is on you loose so much horsepower.

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Good truck

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 8 Fun-to-Drive: 7 Build Quality: 10
Comfort: 8 Interior Design: 8 Reliability: 10
Fuel Economy: 9 Exterior Design: 8

Vehicle

1997 GMC Sonoma 2 Dr SLS Sport Standard Cab SB

Review

I've owned this truck since new and it has been the best vehicle I have ever owned. I have 170,000 miles on it and it has never let me down once. GM built a good one in this little truck. Thank you GM.

Favorite Features

Reliabilty

Suggested Improvements

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Excellent

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 10 Fun-to-Drive: 10 Build Quality: 10
Comfort: 8 Interior Design: 8 Reliability: 10
Fuel Economy: 9 Exterior Design: 10

Vehicle

1997 GMC Sonoma 2 Dr SLE Extended Cab SB

Review

The current Sonoma I drive has been well cared for and has had few major repairs. I received it from my family in 2003, but was purchased in 9/1997. My experience has been that it requires very little maintence and was well built. Except for regular oil and lube, has endured large amounts of travel in the last 3 years has held up very well. The model I have is not the most comfortable, but I am satisfied with design. The a/c performs well as well a the heater.

Favorite Features

The color of the truck and interior, and especially the day running lights!

Suggested Improvements

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

For the Money, It wasnt too bad

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 9 Fun-to-Drive: 5 Build Quality: 5
Comfort: 5 Interior Design: 5 Reliability: 7
Fuel Economy: 4 Exterior Design: 6

Vehicle

1997 GMC Sonoma 2 Dr SLS Sport Extended Cab Stepside SB

Review

This was the first car I purchased. GMC did a good thing when they created 4.3 V6 Vortec. This is the most reliable engine that I have ever driven. The body rusts way to easily however, so whoever forgot the clear coat at the assembly plant needs to get smacked. Also, the windshield wiper motor began to short circuit around 110000. Also, the tires recommended by all tire shops are not the ones on the car, which is weird. The suspension is awful. As a result, the interior creaks and squeaks like no other. Also, 2WD, especially in Wisconsin, makes this truck absolutely useless in the winter being that the bed is so light and suspension so loose.

Favorite Features

The torque. No matter how many miles on this truck, the tires were always able to be roasted and almost any other car could be beaten off the line. Very fast acceleration from 0-45 and from 60-85.

Suggested Improvements

Make a better rust proof paint job, and find a better use for the space in the extended cab portion aside from the useless jump seats. Also, the fuel economy for a small truck like this is awful.16 MPG is ridiculous.

1 out 1 people found this review helpful

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Leaks everything.

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 7 Fun-to-Drive: 4 Build Quality: 2
Comfort: 4 Interior Design: 5 Reliability: 2
Fuel Economy: 6 Exterior Design: 5

Vehicle

1997 GMC Sonoma 2 Dr SLS Sport 4WD Extended Cab SB

Review

Has leaked oil, coolant, trans lube, freon since the day I bought it. GM would do nothing. Had to drive a whole year without heat because nobody could figure out why or fix it. Noisy transmission. Mysterious electrical problems. Eats oxygen sensors. Needs new ones every 2 years. Drove about 4 years with the "check engine" light on. Hard to fix since everything is so tightly jammed in the engine compartment. I would not buy GMC again. Yeah, a Sonoma is not a "real" truck. But just because it's small is no excuse for bad design and manufacturing. It wasn't a cheap truck.

Favorite Features

It often moves forward when you step on the gas.

Suggested Improvements

Make it repairable. Make it so it doesn't leak a quart a month of every known fluid.

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Buying & Selling

Vehicle Details

Multimedia

  • Photos
  • Photo Archive

Ratings & Reviews

Payment Calculators

Helpful Tools

Advertisement

Advertisement