Have You Considered...

1997 Geo Metro

1997 Geo Metro 2 Dr LSi Hatchback
Photos
Fuel economy: N/A
True Cost to Own®: Not available

Used TMV from $1,198

SEARCH INVENTORY Appraise Your Car

What Edmunds Says

Not Available

Pros

Excellent fuel economy, low price

Cons

Underpowered, little standard equipment, why buy a new Metro when lots of nice used cars are available?

Read full review

Advertisement

For Sale in Your Area

Available Hatchback Models

Use the Edmunds Pricing System to help you get the best deal:

Base

  • 1.0L 3-cyl. engine 
  • Manual transmission 

View All Features & Specs

Used TMV from $1,198

APPRAISE YOUR CAR submodelindex:0,make:Geo, submodel:Metro Hatchback, year:1997, trim.trimName:Base, zip:90025

LSi

  • 1.3L 4-cyl. engine 
  • Manual transmission 

View All Features & Specs

Used TMV from $1,278

APPRAISE YOUR CAR submodelindex:1,make:Geo, submodel:Metro Hatchback, year:1997, trim.trimName:LSi, zip:90025

Available Sedan Models

Use the Edmunds Pricing System to help you get the best deal:

LSi

  • 1.3L 4-cyl. engine 
  • Manual transmission 

View All Features & Specs

Used TMV from $1,350

APPRAISE YOUR CAR submodelindex:0,make:Geo, submodel:Metro Sedan, year:1997, trim.trimName:LSi, zip:90025

What's New for 1997

Geo drops the base sedan variant of the Metro for 1997. A new convenience package is available on LSi models, and the LSi hatchback comes with the larger 1.3-liter engine standard. Two new colors debut.

Review

General Motors calls the Metro "the small car with big ideas." Big dreams, more likely. What we have here is transportation in its most basic form. The Metro hatchback and sedan are bargains on the new car market from a financial perspective, but they don't offer much value in comparison to other vehicles in this price range.

What else is even in this price range? The Hyundai Accent is, and it offers consumers more for the money. True, Hyundai's reliabilty record is unimpressive, but early indicators point to improved build quality in the Accent. In contrast, the Metro comes across as an underdeveloped tin can. Even Ford's underwhelming Aspire seems to be a better, though uglier, buy. We'd also investigate the Kia Sephia, which feels more substantial than the Geo and is based on proven Mazda componentry.

Metro sports dual airbags, and in the way of standard equipment, the base hatchback comes with very little. LSi models add little more than a few convenience items. A wimpy 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine powers the base hatchback; LSi's get a 70-horsepower four cylinder under the hood. While more sprightly than a comparably equipped Ford Aspire, the Metro LSi is still no drag racer. The base hatchback is even more sluggish.

For 1997, the Metro is spruced up with two new exterior colors and a new LSi convenience package that includes dual exterior mirrors, a passenger seatback pocket, a remote hatch/trunk release, a security cover for hatchbacks, and a split-folding rear seat for sedans. This helps the value equation somewhat, but not enough to sway our opinion. LSi coupes benefit from a larger engine this year as well, getting a 1.3-liter engine standard

A fully loaded LSi sedan can top $13,000. That's Geo Prizm and Chevy Cavalier territory, folks, and they are both in a different, and much better, league than the Metro. Our advice in this segment? Try an Accent or a Sephia. If a Korean-assembled car doesn't sit well with you, get a nice used car. Chances are you'll be happier with it.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Research Models

Recently Viewed

    Select your vehicles