I loved the comfort of the '90 version,
so after driving a Protege around for
four years, it was time to go back to
The Taurus is solid for the $$$ you pay
for it. I paid $11k for it in '99
(with 30,000 miles), versus an Accord
which would have cost me $17k. At
117,000 miles now (Dec. '03), it's time
to trade-in for another car (unlike
our '92 Accord, which is going strong
at 150,000 miles). As with my '90
Taurus, I am starting to experience
reliability issues after 100,000 miles,
and I fear that it will nickel and dime
me to death. But, I got what I paid
for, and am happy (and more
comfortable) for the experience.
Comfort. The seats are like sitting on
a couch. I also like the unique
exterior design of the '97.
Not nearly as reliable long-term as the
Accord (but not nearly as expensive
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.