1992 Ford Taurus Review

TMV:
Appraise your car

Photos Videos

N/A

Editors' Rating

Not Yet Rated | Read the Model Review

Fuel Economy

19 - 21 mpg

The Edmunds.com review of the 1992 Ford Taurus is unavailable at this time.

Consumer Ratings & Reviews

thought I would never like ford

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 4 Fun-to-Drive: 9 Build Quality: 1
Comfort: 8 Interior Design: 2 Reliability: 5
Fuel Economy: 4 Exterior Design: 8

Vehicle

1992 Ford Taurus 4 Dr GL Sedan

Review

I bought the car with 106000 miles. It now has 196500. I bought it form an elderly lady that had bought it brand new. Seems all I have been doing is puting new or used parts in it this summer. The suspension in these cars stink. It is too stiff. The roof liner is falling down. had to replace the radiator, hoses and goose neck which still leaks under pressure. All new brake part in the rear. (Disc) used hood and rear passenger door. Easier then replacing the window motor. replaced all other window switches. The rod in the stearing colum broke so I do not need a key to start it. New battery. But the realy scary thing is is she keeps going. Ford did ok with this car. I would buy another one.

Favorite Features

Cruise control. remote radio control on dash. though mine dosent work anymore it was nice.

Suggested Improvements

alot more leg room. 3/4 split seat in back that folds down. better suspension.

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Comfy but not reliable

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 7 Fun-to-Drive: 9 Build Quality: 9
Comfort: 10 Interior Design: 9 Reliability: 4
Fuel Economy: 7 Exterior Design: 7

Vehicle

1992 Ford Taurus 4 Dr LX Sedan

Review

All in all i like this car. It's extremly comfertable but not very reliable. I just bought it nine months ago so obviously its old but sometimes i feel like its broken more then its running. On the plus side I enjoy driving it. I feel very safe in it and the visibility when driving is great.

Favorite Features

Bench-style from seats, decent on gas, fun to drive

Suggested Improvements

Everything breaks! It's always something with this car

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

500 dollars well invested

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 9 Fun-to-Drive: 8 Build Quality: 8
Comfort: 8 Interior Design: 8 Reliability: 10
Fuel Economy: 7 Exterior Design: 8

Vehicle

1992 Ford Taurus 4 Dr L Sedan

Review

We bought the car used and for only $500 dollars. When you buy something for that price and at that age things will go wrong. We have had it for almost a year now and the car still starts and runs. We had to do two repairs on it but nothing to serious. 1st thing was a oil leak and second was a MAF sensor. Other then those two things it runs great. So I can trust my teens in this car to drive because it's big and dependable

Favorite Features

Roomy and fun to drive considering I usually drive a big SUV

Suggested Improvements

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Very good

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 8 Fun-to-Drive: 9 Build Quality: 7
Comfort: 8 Interior Design: 8 Reliability: 8
Fuel Economy: 8 Exterior Design: 8

Vehicle

1992 Ford Taurus 4 Dr LX Sedan

Review

This car has a 3.8. 158k on it runs like new. Shifts great. I paid $1500 for it and drive about 150 miles a week. In two years only put on brake pads and tires .

Favorite Features

Ride is nice. Looks good and a lot of room

Suggested Improvements

Better place for cup holder

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Not So Good

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating 

Performance: 6 Fun-to-Drive: 3 Build Quality: 5
Comfort: 9 Interior Design: 6 Reliability: 3
Fuel Economy: 4 Exterior Design: 6

Vehicle

1992 Ford Taurus 4 Dr GL Sedan

Review

I have a lot of miles on this thing and it is not holding up well. I have put more money into it in repairs than what I bought it for. Would have trashed it if I didn't need a car.

Favorite Features

Comfort, well-working AC.

Suggested Improvements

Defroster on the front windshield is frusterating and slow, ceiling interior is falling and ripping, needs more cup holders instead of a middle front seat.

Was this review helpful?      Yes No

Report inappropriate post

Buying & Selling

Vehicle Details

Multimedia

  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Photo Archive

Ratings & Reviews

Payment Calculators

Helpful Tools

Advertisement

Advertisement