2002 Ford Econoline Wagon Review and Specs

Summary

What Edmunds.com says

Why buy a minivan when for the same price you can have a full-size van? Oh right, parking and fuel economy, to name just two. Well, if you've got nothing but wide-open spaces and lots of cash to plug into the tank, give the Ford Econoline Wagon a try. And look closely at the XLT Traveler, which is to family road trips what Valium is to stress.

Pros

Massive people-hauling and cargo-toting ability, powerful engines, wide range of configurations, available Traveler package.

Cons

Fuel economy, size.

What's New for 2002

All Econolines get A-pillar grab handles, tilt steering, backlit cruise control switches, an illuminated rear auxiliary climate control switch, low-fuel and cruise-control-on indicators in the gauge cluster. Newly optional on the XL is an overhead console. XLT has standard dual illuminated sun visors and front floor mats. E-350 Super Duty models can now be equipped with the luxury Traveler package, while E-350 Super Duty Extended vans get an upgraded transmission. Optional on XLT is an in-dash six-CD changer, and models equipped with the Chateau package get a dual-media cassette/CD stereo, privacy glass and an overhead console.

Consumer Ratings & Reviews

Not a Good Buy

Written by: Irony on 06/14/2004

Detailed Ratings

Overall Rating


Performance:	1	Fun-to-Drive:	1	Build Quality:	1
Comfort:	7	Interior Design:	5	Reliability:	1
Fuel Economy:	1	Exterior Design:	5

Vehicle

2002 Ford Econoline Wagon E-150 XLT 3dr Van (4.2L 6cyl 4A)

Review

I have replaced the front brakes including rotors every 3 months approx. 3000-4000 miles. Ford told me this was normal wear for this vehicle. The price to have this done at a Ford Dealer averages $800. The tires wear out quickly on this Van as well.

Favorite Features

I love the quad seating and video system. It makes long trips with the kids fun.

Suggested Improvements

The suspension and braking need to be beefed up considerably to eliminate the excessive wear on the brakes and tires.

Report inappropriate post

ford van

Written by: wriddle on 03/07/2004


Performance:	8	Fun-to-Drive:	7	Build Quality:	7
Comfort:	9	Interior Design:	8	Reliability:	10
Fuel Economy:	3	Exterior Design:	8

nice van, mediocre fuel economy, very comfortable, minor build quality issues which have been corrected under warranty. would definitely buy another one when this one wears out. 5.4 engine is the way to go.

comfortable smooth ride.

rear disc brakes, improved fuel economy, more stout engine oil dipstick.

Loving the Travler Package

Written by: tripping_in_virginia on 08/17/2003


Performance:	8	Fun-to-Drive:	8	Build Quality:	9
Comfort:	9	Interior Design:	9	Reliability:	9
Fuel Economy:	5	Exterior Design:	8

We have had mini-vans and sedans. Looked at SUV's for the extra space but found the full-size Traveler package fo the Ford van beats everything hands down on space and the basic comforts now offered in travler packages like video, game plug in ports, reclining buckets for all four passangers up front, leather seats and lots and lots of cargo room. Plus the baby can haul any camper or boat you may wish to pull down the highway. We are very budget minded so one way to offset the fuel economy issue is that we use this for our only vehicle. It has handled very nicely around town and obviously excels on the open road.

1. Space 2. Reclining buckets for the kids 3. Entertainment console 4. Sit up high on the road

1. They need to give more leg room 2. AC not cool enough around town

Killer Traveler Van

Written by: suburbank2500 on 07/25/2003


Performance:	10	Fun-to-Drive:	10	Build Quality:	10
Comfort:	10	Interior Design:	10	Reliability:	10
Fuel Economy:	10	Exterior Design:	10

This van is my daily commuter; It's got the Traveller package, and the kid quiet option (2 screens with a VCP). I've always been 'get the bigger motor' but the 289 (4.6L) v8 is just fine. I get about 20-21 on highway, 15-17 mixed. the ONLY thing is it's a rear wheel driver, so I'll have to retrain myself for winter. Don't waste your money on some tinny, mini-van. They don't have nearly the room and cost about $2-$3K more

The ride height. Nobody cuts me off that much.

They do make an E350 version, but try and find it.

FORD 100% BETTER THAN CHEVY

Written by: JOE MASTENCIA on 12/09/2002


Performance:	10	Fun-to-Drive:	10	Build Quality:	10
Comfort:	10	Interior Design:	10	Reliability:	10
Fuel Economy:	10	Exterior Design:	10

2002 Ford Econoline Wagon E-350 SD XLT 3dr Van (5.4L 8cyl 4A)

I DROVE BOTH VANS AND HANDS DOWN THE FORD KILLED THE CHEVY. I ORIGINALY WANTED A CHEVY BUT I WAS SWAYED BY FRIENDS THAT OWNED FORD VANS AND THEIR FEEDBACK MADE ME MAKE THE SWITCH. FORD CARS ARE IFFY BUT THEY SURE KNOW HOW TO MAKE A TRUCK.

TRANNY SOLID!!!

NONE!!!

2002 Ford Econoline Wagon Consumer Ratings & Reviews